Skip to main content
Download PDF

Atg5 deficiency in macrophages protects against kidney fibrosis via the CCR6-CCL20 axis

Cell Communication and Signaling volume 22, Article number: 223 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Autophagy is a lysosome-dependent degradation pathway that regulates macrophage activation, differentiation, and polarization. Autophagy related 5 (Atg5) is a key protein involved in phagocytic membrane elongation in autophagic vesicles that forms a complex with Atg12 and Atg16L1. Alterations in Atg5 are related to both acute and chronic kidney diseases in experimental models. However, the role of macrophage-expressed Atg5 in acute kidney injury remains unclear.

Methods

Using a myeloid cell-specific Atg5 knockout (MΦ atg5−/−) mouse, we established renal ischemia/reperfusion and unilateral ureteral obstruction models to evaluate the role of macrophage Atg5 in renal macrophage migration and fibrosis.

Results

Based on changes in the serum urea nitrogen and creatinine levels, Atg5 deletion had a minimal effect on renal function in the early stages after mild injury; however, MΦ atg5−/− mice had reduced renal fibrosis and reduced macrophage recruitment after 4 weeks of ischemia/reperfusion injury and 2 weeks of unilateral ureteral obstruction injury. Atg5 deficiency impaired the CCL20-CCR6 axis after severe ischemic kidneys. Chemotactic responses of bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMDMs) from MΦ atg5−/− mice to CCL20 were significantly attenuated compared with those of wild-type BMDMs, and this might be caused by the inhibition of PI3K, AKT, and ERK1/2 activation.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that Atg5 deficiency decreased macrophage migration by impairing the CCL20-CCR6 axis and inhibited M2 polarization, thereby improving kidney fibrosis.

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a global public health issue that is characterized by kidney function loss, leading to high morbidity and mortality rates [1]. Currently, no therapeutic approaches can prevent injury, improve survival, or accelerate recovery upon AKI onset. Additionally, insufficient AKI recovery leads to chronic kidney injury [2,3,4,5]. After the acute phase, persistent maladaptive repair promotes inflammation and fibrosis in the chronic phase. Furthermore, the activation of effector cells by inflammatory cells is generally considered the trigger for fibrosis. Macrophages play a critical role in the translation of injury to abnormal repair in renal fibrosis, which is an important determinant of AKI outcomes [6,7,8,9,10,11].

Autophagy is a highly conserved lysosome-dependent mechanism. Senescent organelles or abnormal proteins are transported by cells to lysosomes, where they are degraded by mediating multiple autophagy-related genes and complex cellular signaling pathways [12, 13]. Atg5 (autophagy related 5) is involved in phagocytic membrane elongation in autophagic vesicles and forms a complex with Atg12 and Atg16L1 [14]. Many evidence suggests that Atg5 in kidney tubules is involved in kidney repair during transition from AKI to chronic kidney disease (CKD), Tubular specific Atg5 knockout (KO) mice exhibit aggravated IRI or cisplatin induced renal injury and cell apoptosis. Atg5-deficient cells accumulated deformed mitochondria, increased ROS production, DNA damage, proximal tubule cell apoptosis, and loss of renal function. In addition, Baisantry et al. demonstrated that Atg5 deficient renal tubular cells can attenuate kidney injury after ischemic AKI, reduce inflammation and interstitial fibrosis. Therefore, it remains controversial whether Atg5 promotes or inhibits fibrosis [15,16,17,18].

Rapamycin is an activator of autophagy by inhibiting the mechanism target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) [19]. Zhang et al. found that rapamycin inhibited M1 macrophage polarization and renal fibrosis by activating macrophage autophagy [20]. Treatment of macrophages with an autophagy agonist reportedly ameliorated lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced AKI, consequently inhibiting the secretion of inflammatory factors, whereas the inhibition of macrophage autophagy promoted the release of inflammatory factors [21]. These results indicate that intervening in macrophage autophagy can affect its polarization, chronic inflammation and ultimately fibrosis. However, the role of Atg5 in macrophage related to AKI or kidney fibrosis are unclear.

Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the function of Atg5 using mouse models of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). We further explored whether deletion of myeloid Atg5 impacts recovery from renal ischemic injury and promotes subsequent renal fibrosis.

Methods

Animals

All animal experiments complied with a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University. Atg5flox/flox and LysM-Cre mice were obtained from a C57BL/6 background. Atg5flox/flox and LysM-Cre mice were purchased from RIKEN BioResource Research Center (RBRC02975) and Jackson Laboratory (004781), respectively. Atg5flox/flox mice were crossed with LysM-Cre+ mice to obtain LysM-Cre+Atg5flox/flox macrophage-conditional Atg5 knockout (MΦ atg5−/−) and LysM-Cre–Atg5flox/flox (WT) littermate mice. All mice were genotyped using PCR before and after all experiments. Genotyping of genomic DNA from the tail of a 4-week-old mouse was performed using PCR amplification with primers Atg5flox/flox (5’-GAATATGAAGGCACACCCCTGAAATG-3’, 5’-ACAACGTCGAGCACAGCTGCGCAAGG-3’, and 5’-GTACTGCATAATGGTTTAACTCT TGC-3’) and LysM-Cre (5’-CCCAGAAATGCCAGATTACG-3’, 5’-CTTGGGCTGCCAGA ATTTCTC-3’, and 5’-TTACAGTCGGCCAGGCTGAC-3’). Atg5flox/flox amplified a 700-bp fragment, while LysM-Cre+/− amplification of a 350-bp fragment and a 700-bp fragment. The mice were bred and maintained under pathogen-free conditions at an experimental animal center (Nanfang Hospital) under a natural light cycle with free access to water and food. Specifically, 8–10-week-old male mice were used in this study and subjected to surgical procedures.

Establishment of I/R and UUO mouse models

First, the mice were intraperitoneally anesthetized with barbital sodium (60 mg/kg) for the kidney I/R models. During surgery, a homeothermic blanket control unit with a rectal probe (Shanghai Yuyan Scientific Instrument Co., Shanghai, China, Y585650809) was used to maintain body temperature at 36.5 Â°C. The kidneys were subjected to bilateral flank incisions, and both pedicles were clamped for 26 min. After the clamp was released, color changes in the kidneys were noted, which suggested adequate ischemia and reperfusion. Animals were sacrificed at different times (1 day, 4 days, and 7 days). Therefore, to induce unilateral renal I/R, the left renal pedicle was clamped for 31 min. Subsequently, the clamp was released for reperfusion at different durations (14 and 28 days). In contrast, sham control mice underwent the same procedure without a clamped renal pedicle. In a part of the unilateral ischemia AKI experiments, left renal reperfusion was performed for 13 days, after which the right kidney was removed, and blood samples were collected 1 day later to determine blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine levels to evaluate left kidney function. For the UUO models, the left abdominal cavity of the mouse was opened, the left ureter was exposed and separated, and the middle ureter was ligated with a silk thread. Finally, the mice were sacrificed 14 days after UUO, and the contralateral and obstructed kidneys were harvested for further analysis.

Flow cytometry

Kidney cell suspensions were prepared from the mice subjected to I/R, UUO, or sham surgery. The kidneys were perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), minced into fragments, filtered through a 40-µm filter, and digested in Gey’s balanced salt solution containing 0.7 mg/mL Liberase (Roche, 5,401,127,001) for 30 min at 37 Â°C to obtain a single-cell suspension. Next, red blood cells were removed using erythrocyte lysis buffer (QIAGEN, 79,217). The cells were blocked in 2.5 mg/mL Fc blocking solution and then stained with the fluorescent antibodies PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse CD45.2 (109,827), PE anti-mouse F4/80 (123,110), FITC anti-mouse CD11c (117,306), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD206 (141,720), and APC/Cy7 anti-mouse CD11b (557,657). These antibodies were purchased from BioLegend, except for APC/Cy7 anti-mouse CD11b, which was purchased from BD Biosciences. Macrophages were identified as CD45+ CD11c− CD11b+ F4/80+ cells. PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD206 antibody was used to identify M2 macrophage polarization. Flow cytometry data were acquired on the BD Canto II system (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and analyzed using FCS Express 10.0 software.

Renal function, histology, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative image analysis

Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points to examine renal function. Whole blood was allowed to settle at room temperature (∽ 25 °C) for 30 min. After coagulation, the blood samples were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4 Â°C, and the supernatant was collected as the serum sample. BUN and serum creatinine levels were measured on an automatic biochemical analyzer (Mindray, Shenzhen, China, BS-240VET) using BUN (Mindray, 0041-30-53008) and creatinine (Mindray, 105-000456-00) assay kits.

For histology, kidney tissues were washed in cold PBS, fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 24 h, and sliced into 4-µm sections. Parts of the paraffinized sections were used for Masson’s trichrome staining (Leagene, DC0032) or SR/Fast green staining (Leagene, DC0040) following the manufacturer’s procedures. Finally, the fibrosis area (%) was measured in 10 randomly selected fields from each section using ImageJ software.

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4-µm paraformaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded kidney tissue sections. Briefly, the sections were incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide, and Tris-EDTA antigen repair solution (pH 9.0) (absin, abs9342) was used after dewaxing and rehydration. The samples were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin blocking solution and incubated overnight at 4 Â°C with the following primary antibody solutions: CD11b (Abcam, ab10079; 1:250), vimentin (Proteintech, 10366-1-AP; 1:250), α-SMA (actin alpha 2, Abcam, ab5694; 1:250), or fibronectin 1 (FN1, Abcam, ab2413; 1:250). Finally, tissue staining was visualized under a microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan, ECLIPSE Ci-S), and the positive area (%) was analyzed in 10 randomly selected fields from each section using ImageJ software.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the kidney or isolated renal myeloid cells with TRIzol Reagent (Ambion, 15,596,026) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA was reverse-transcribed into single-stranded cDNA using a commercial reverse transcription kit (Roche, 4,897,030,001). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on the LightCycler 480 System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using the SYBR Green I Master kit (Roche, 4,887,352,001), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were calibrated to glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase values. The sequences of primers used in the experiments included Atg5, α-SMA (Acta2), Collagen 1a1 (Col1a1), CCR6 (Ccr6), CXCR2 (Cxcr2), CCL20 (Ccl20),TNFα (Tnfα), Il6 (Il-6), iNOS (iNOS), TGFβ1 (Tgfb1), and GADPH (Gapdh) (Table S1).

Isolation and treatment of BMDMs

MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, sacrificed, and soaked in 75% alcohol for 3 min for disinfection. Subsequently, the tibia and femur were harvested. Next, the tibia and femur cells were flushed using a 1-mL syringe with RPMI 1640 medium (Solarbio, 31,800) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, 10099-141). The cell suspension was passed through a 40-µm cell strainer, centrifuged, resuspended in 5 mL of erythrocyte lysis buffer (QIAGEN, 79,217), and incubated for 5 min. The cells were recentrifuged and resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium with 5 mM HEPES followed by monocyte isolation using a monocyte isolation kit for mice (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-100-629) to obtain BMDMs. Finally, the BMDMs were plated in a 6-well plate at a density of 4 × 106 cells per well and stimulated with 1 Âµg/mL LPS or PBS for 4 h at 37 Â°C.

Tracking monocyte cell migration into the injured kidney

BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice were labeled using CellTracker™ green 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA) dye (Invitrogen, c70251). Each C57BL/6 recipient mouse was injected with 2 × 106 CMFDA-labeled BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− or WT mice via the tail and subjected to unilateral renal pedicle clamping for 31 min the next day. Three days later, the animals were sacrificed, and the injured kidneys were collected for cryosections. Next, kidney macrophage infiltration was evaluated by counting double-positive labeling with CMFDA (green) and F4/80 (red) using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany, LSM980), which was identified as 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole+nuclei (DAPI, Solarbio, C0065) as described in the literature [22]. Finally, flow cytometry was used to analyze the number of macrophage migration to the injured kidney.

Isolation of kidney macrophages

Single-cell suspensions were obtained from kidney tissues using enzymatic digestion with Liberase (Roche, 05401127001) diluted in Gey’s balanced salt solution. Fascia removal was performed using a 40-µm cell strainer. Next, F4/80+ cells were extracted from the cell suspension using the EasySepâ„¢ Mouse Biotin Positive Selection Kit II (STEMCELL, 17,665) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the kidney cells were transferred to a 5-mL (12 × 75 mm) polystyrene round-bottom tube and resuspended in RoboSep Buffer (STEMCELL, 20,104), blocked with FcR, and incubated with anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (STEMCELL, 60027BT) for 15 min. Subsequently, the cells were centrifuged, resuspended, incubated with the selection cocktail for 15 min, and reacted with RapidSpheres for 10 min. Finally, the tubes (without lids) were placed into a magnet (STEMCELL, 18,103) for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the cells were collected from the sides of the tube.

Cell migration in vitro

The in vitro migration of BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice was evaluated using Transwells as previously described [22, 23]. Freshly isolated BMDMs (1 × 106) were seeded in the top chamber of a 24-well polyester membrane (8-mm pore size; BD Biosciences, 353,097) in serum-free medium. The cells translocated to the lower chamber in response to exposure to RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 50 ng/mL CXCL3 (R&D Systems, 453-KC-010) or CCL20 (ORIGENE, TP723274). After incubation for 4 h, the cells in the upper chamber were gently wiped with a cotton swab, and the filter membrane was fixed with 4% methanol and stained with 0.2% crystal violet (Solarbio, g1061). Next, the filters were photographed using a microscope (OLYMPUS, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan, BX63), and the cell numbers were counted in each field of view under ×200 magnification.

Western blotting

BMDMs were seeded in a 6-well plate at 3.5 × 106 cells per well. Cells in the experimental group were treated with 200 ng/mL CXCL3 or CCL20 collected after 30 min incubation at 37 Â°C. Subsequently, the stimulated BMDMs were homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer (CWBIO, CW23335) containing protease inhibitors for 30 min at 4 Â°C and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was collected as the total protein for Western blotting. The primary and secondary antibodies were as follows: β-actin (Sigma, A5361; 1:1000), AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, 4691; 1:1000), p-AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, 4060; 1:1000), ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9102; 1:1000), p-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4307; 1:1000), PI3K (Cell Signaling Technology, 4257; 1:1000), p-PI3K (Cell Signaling Technology, 4228; 1:1000), goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Asbio, As006; 1:2000), and goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Asbio, As005; 1:2000). ECL detection reagents (Cytiva, RPN2232) were used for color development and Tanon gel imaging, and the gray value was obtained after analysis using ImageJ software.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1 (GraphPad). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. To assess the significant differences, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests were used to compare 2 independent groups, and one-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA was used to compare 3 or more groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Selective ablation of Atg5 in the myeloid cells of mice

Atg5-floxed mice were hybridized with LysM-Cre mice to establish conditional deletion of Atg5. The breeding protocol is shown in Fig. 1A. Two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sets were conducted for each mouse to verify the genotypes. The genotype of myeloid cell-specific Atg5 knockout (MΦ atg5−/−) mice was identified by amplification of the 700-bp fragment of the floxed allele, insufficient amplification of the 350-bp fragment of the wild type (WT) allele, and amplification of the 700-bp fragment of the Cre gene (Fig. 1B). The effectiveness of Atg5 deletion in renal macrophages of samples isolated from MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice using F4/80 + cell magnetic beads was determined using quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 1C). These mice also showed low BUN and serum creatinine levels without surgical treatment, indicating that renal function remained normal (data not shown).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Renal myeloid autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) was efficiently deleted in LysM-Cre+/−Atg5f/f (MΦ atg5−/−) mice. (A) Breeding protocol for generating LysM-Cre+/−Atg5f/f (MΦ atg5−/−) and Cre−/−Atg5f/f (WT) male littermates, aged 8–10 weeks, for subsequent experiments after genotypes were confirmed. (B) MΦ atg5−/− mice verified by polymerase chain reaction using isolated genomic DNA. (C) Atg5 mRNA levels in immunomagnetically sorted kidney macrophages from WT and MΦ atg5−/− mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, n = 3 per group, **** P < 0.0001 versus WT macrophages. Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test

Full size image

Atg5 deletion in myeloid cells did not affect renal function in the early stages of AKI

At each point during the early stage of AKI, MΦ atg5−/− mice did not exhibit any changes in BUN and serum creatinine levels compared with those of the WT littermate mice (Fig. 2A), and the level of kidney inflammation and injury was visualized by the HE staining (Figure S1), indicating that Atg5 deletion in myeloid cells did not affect renal function during early AKI. Flow cytometric analysis showed that the number of renal macrophages (F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c− cells) was similar at baseline between MΦ atg5−/− and WT littermate mice; however, it was significantly decreased on days 1 and 4 after ischemic injury in KO mice (Fig. 2, B and C). Similarly, immunohistochemical staining on days 1 and 4 after AKI induction showed that the kidneys of MΦ atg5−/− mice had less CD11b+ cells infiltration than those of WT littermate mice (Fig. 2D, Figure S2a).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Myeloid autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) deletion inhibited macrophage migration into the kidneys in early acute ischemic injury. Wild-type (WT) and MΦ atg5−/− mice underwent 26 min of bilateral renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and were sacrificed at the indicated time points. (A) Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine levels in WT and MΦ atg5−/− mice at days 0, 1, 4, and 7 after I/R injury (n = 8–10 per group). (B and C) Flow cytometric analysis showing the number of renal macrophages (F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c− CD45+ cells) in MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice (B) at baseline and (C) on days 1 and 4 after I/R. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (n = 3–4 per group). (D) Immunohistochemical staining for CD11b on kidney sections from both experimental groups at days 1 and 4 after AKI induction. Scale bar: 50 Î¼m. Quantitation of the levels of CD11b+ cells from the renal cortex of MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, **** P < 0.0001 (n = 4 per group). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (A, C, D); Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test (B)

Full size image

Atg5 deletion in myeloid cells protects against renal fibrosis

We performed unilateral renal ischemia surgery (duration, 31 min) to elucidate the specific role of Atg5 in macrophages in the progression of renal fibrosis. After 13 days of left renal reperfusion, the right kidney was removed, and blood samples were collected 1 day later. Our test indicated that serum creatinine and albumin levels were lower in MΦ atg5−/− mice than in WT littermate mice (Fig. 3A). MΦ atg5−/− mice also showed reduced interstitial fibrosis as indicated using Sirius red (SR) and Masson staining after 2 or 4 weeks of 31-min unilateral renal ischemia (Fig. 3, B–D). Immunohistochemical staining for fibrotic components showed lower levels of FN1, vimentin, and α-SMA in the kidneys of MΦ atg5−/− mice than in those of WT littermate mice (Fig. 3, E–H), indicating reduced severity of renal fibrosis. Additionally, we demonstrated that the counts of F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c− renal macrophages were decreased in the kidneys of MΦ atg5−/− mice compared with those in WT littermate mice using flow cytometry analysis. The numbers of M1 and M2 macrophages were determined by gating on CD206− F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c− cells and CD206+ F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c− cells, respectively. Therefore, we found that Atg5 deletion inhibited the polarization of M1 macrophages toward M2 macrophages at 28 days after ischemic injury (Fig. 3I). Additionally, quantitative real-time PCR revealed lower renal mRNA levels of collagen 1a1 and α-SMA at 4 weeks after I/R in MΦ atg5−/− mice than in WT littermate mice (Fig. 3, J and K, Figure S2b, c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Macrophage autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) deletion protects against kidney fibrosis after I/R injury. (A) Serum creatinine and BUN levels of MΦ atg5−/− and wild type (WT) mice. Mice underwent 31-min unilateral renal ischemia (UI31R) surgery, the right kidney was removed after 13 days of left renal reperfusion, and blood samples were collected 1 day later. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.01 (n = 6 per group). Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (B-K) WT and MΦ atg5−/− mice underwent 31-min unilateral renal I/R and were sacrificed at 2 or 4 weeks. Representative images and positive area rate of Sirius red (B and C) and Masson (B and D) staining of MΦ atg5−/− mouse kidney cortex sections showing reduced renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. (E) Representative fibrosis immunohistochemical staining images showing decreased renal fibrosis in MΦ atg5−/− mice. Renal expression of fibronectin 1 (FN1) (F), vimentin (G), and α-SMA (H), a marker of myofibroblasts. Scale bars: 50 Î¼m. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 (n = 4 per group). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (C, D, F, G, H). (I) Flow cytometric analysis showing the number of insulted renal macrophages (F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c− CD45+ cells) and the M1/M2 ratio of macrophages in MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice on day 28 after ischemic injury. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (n = 4 per group). Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (J and K) The mRNA levels of profibrotic and fibrotic collagen 1a1 and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in insulted left kidneys of MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ****P < 0.0001 (collagen 1a1 groups, n = 6 each; α-SMA groups, n = 4 each). Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test

Full size image

Similarly, 14 days after UUO, the kidneys of MΦ atg5−/− mice revealed less renal fibrosis, as indicated using quantitative SR and Masson staining (Fig. 4, A–C), and reduced staining for fibrotic components (FN1, vimentin, and α-SMA) compared to WT littermate mice (Fig. 4, D–G). We also found lower numbers of F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c− macrophages and a higher ratio of M1/M2 macrophages in the obstructed kidneys of MΦ atg5−/− mice than in the kidneys of WT littermate mice (Fig. 4H, Figure S2d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Macrophage autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) deletion protected against renal fibrosis in a unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mouse model. (A-H) UUO was induced in WT and MΦ atg5−/− mice for 2 weeks. Representative images and positive area rate of Sirius red (A and B), Masson (A and C), and immunohistochemical staining for FN1 (D and E), vimentin (D and F), and α-SMA (D and G) showing less renal fibrosis in MΦ atg5−/− mice than in WT mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001 (n = 4 per group). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. (H) Flow cytometric analysis showing renal macrophages (F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c− CD45+ cells) and the M1/M2 ratio of macrophages in the obstructed kidneys from MΦ atg5-/- mice and WT mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (n = 4 per group). Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test

Full size image

Therefore, the above results from the two independent mouse models of CKD indicate that MΦ atg5−/− has protective effects against kidney fibrosis.

Myeloid Atg5 deletion decreased macrophage migration in vivo

To investigate the potential role of macrophage Atg5 expression in macrophage migration to the injured kidney, we obtained BMDMs from WT or MΦ atg5−/− mice, labeled them using green CMFDA dye, injected 2 × 106 CMFDA-labeled BMDMs into WT littermate mice with induced unilateral I/R injury 16 h prior, and evaluated the number of CMFDA-labeled F4/80 double-positive cells in the kidney 3 days after AKI induction. As indicated in Fig. 5A, significantly fewer double-labeled macrophage atg5−/− cells than double-labeled WT cells were found in the injured kidneys. Flow cytometry also showed that the number of double-positive cells in the kidneys of mice injected with CMFDA probe-labeled atg5 KO BMDMs decreased compared with that of mice injected with WT BMDMs (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Macrophage autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) deletion attenuated macrophage renal infiltration in vivo. Bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMDMs) were isolated from WT and MΦ atg5-/- mice, labeled with the tracking dye 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA), and injected into WT mice; unilateral acute kidney injury was induced the next day. The labeled cells in the kidney were evaluated 3 days after ischemic injury. (A) Representative image of injured kidneys and the number of CMFDA and F4/80 double-positive renal-infiltrated cells in mice receiving Atg5 knockout (KO) and WT monocytes. Scale bar: 50 Î¼m. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.01 (n = 4 per group). (B) Flow cytometric analysis to determine the F4/80 and CMFDA double-positive cell numbers in mice receiving Atg5 KO and WT monocytes. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.01 (n = 6 per group). Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test

Full size image

Atg5 deficiency in macrophages impairs the CCL20-CCR6 axis in experimental kidney fibrosis models

In this study, we explored the mechanism by which Atg5 mediates macrophage migration to the postischemic kidney. Chemokines are known to mediate the infiltration of immune cells into injured tissue, and many studies have shown that autophagy is associated with the CCL20-CCR6 axis. Therefore, we hypothesized that Atg5 deficiency inhibits macrophage migration by impairing the CCL20-CCR6 axis. Infiltration of F4/80+ cells (macrophages) in the kidneys of healthy male C57BL/6 mice peaked 4 days after I/R injury (Fig. 6, A and B). We isolated infiltrating F4/80+ cells (macrophages) from the kidneys of MΦ atg5−/− mice after 4 days of reperfusion following unilateral renal pedicle clamping-induced ischemia for 31 min. Flow cytometric analysis showed that the isolated cell purity was ˃70% (Fig. 6C). Quantitative real-time PCR revealed that atg5 deficient reduced mRNA levels of Atg5 and CCR6, while increased mRNA levels of TNFα and Il6 in isolated renal macrophages (Fig. 6, D-E, Figure S2c). CCR6 is considered the only receptor for CCL20. Increased CCL20 drives the recruitment of CCR6+ immune cells into damaged tissues. Next, we confirmed that the renal expression of CCL20 was significantly decreased in MΦ atg5−/− mice compared with WT mice at 4 and 28 days after AKI and 14 days after UUO (Fig. 6F, Figure S2d). Therefore, these results indicate that Atg5-deficient macrophages impaired the CCL20-CCR6 axis in experimental kidney fibrosis models.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Macrophage autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) deletion impaired the CCR6-CCL20 axis after I/R and UUO injury. (A and B) Flow cytometric analysis determined that F4/80+ macrophage infiltration injured kidneys at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9 days after undergoing 31-min unilateral renal ischemia/reperfusion (UI31R). (C, D and E) MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice were sacrificed 4 days after UI31R injury. (C) F4/80+ macrophages isolated from kidney single-cell suspensions from MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice using immunomagnetic positive selection. Flow cytometric analysis identified the isolated cell purity. (D and E) The renal macrophage mRNA levels of Atg5, TNFα, Il6, CCR6 and CXCR2 in MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.005, **** P < 0.0001 (n = 3–4 per group). Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (F) The renal mRNA level of CCL20 was significantly lower in MΦ atg5−/− mice than in WT mice at 4 and 28 days after UI31R injury and 14 days after UUO injury. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. **** P < 0.0001 (n = 3 per group). Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple-comparison test

Full size image

Myeloid Atg5 deletion decreased the migration response to CCL20 chemokines

To investigate the impact of Atg5 deletion on the CCL20 chemokine response of BMDMs, we selected chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 3 (CXCL3) [ligand of CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2)] as a control [23] based on the data that CXCR2 expression from the isolated infiltration of F4/80+ cells (macrophages) in the kidneys was not different between the MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice 4 days after severe AKI (Fig. 6E). The chemotactic response to CCL20 was significantly inhibited in BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− mice compared with BMDMs from WT mice. However, the response to CXCL3 was not different in BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− mice compared with that of BMDMs from WT mice. Our results indicated that Atg5 deficiency markedly decreased the chemotactic response to CCL20 in BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− mice due to the low expression of CCR6, suggesting that the inhibition of the CCL20-CCR6 axis decreased the migration of Atg5-deficient macrophages (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Macrophage autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) deletion decreased chemotactic responses to CCL20 in BMDMs in vitro. BMDMs were isolated from MΦ atg5−/− mice and WT mice and immediately used for in vitro Transwell migration assays. Chemotactic responses to 10% FBS, CXCL3, and CCL20 in MΦ atg5−/− and WT BMDMs. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 for WT BMDMs versus MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs (n = 5 per group). Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple-comparison test

Full size image

Atg5 deletion inhibits the PI3K/AKT or ERK pathway from affecting macrophage migration

It is known that activation of phosphoinositide-3-kinase-protein kinase B (PI3K-AKT) or mitogen-activated protein kinases-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) is involved in cell migration [24]. The treatment of CXCL3 resulted in the activation of PI3K, AKT, and ERK (increased phosphorylation levels) in WT and MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs. However, CCL20 treatment markedly attenuated the activation of AKT, PI3K, and ERK in MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs compared to WT BMDMs. These results suggest that the reduced CCL20 chemokine responses in MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs inhibited PI3K, AKT, and ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 8, A and B).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Macrophage autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) deletion inhibited the PI3K-AKT pathway. BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice were treated with 200 ng/mL CXCL3 or CCL20 for 0–30 min. Western blot analysis of the activation of the AKT, PI3K, and ERK pathways in WT and MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs following (A) CXCL3 and (B) CCL20 treatment. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 for 0 versus 30 min treatment in WT BMDMs, #P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 for 0 versus 30 min treatment in MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs (n = 3 per group). Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple-comparison test

Full size image

Inflammatory cytokines characteristic of MΦ atg5 −/− BMDMs respond to LPS

We examined whether MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs (isolated from MΦ atg5−/− mice) alter inflammation in response to 4 h of LPS stimulation. We first confirmed that autophagy levels (Atg5 and LC3II/I;) were significantly reduced in MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs (Fig. 9, A and B), and then quantitative real-time PCR revealed that gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα, Il6, and iNOS, was increased in LPS-treated MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs at a dose of 1 Âµg/mL compared to WT BMDMs (P < 0.0001). However, the gene expression of profibrotic cytokines such as TGFβ1 was inhibited in MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs after stimulation with 1 Âµg/mL LPS (P < 0.05). The results showed that Atg5 deficiency promoted the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines but inhibited the secretion of profibrotic cytokines. We also confirmed that the M1/M2 ratio of macrophage polarization (CD206+ F4/80+ CD11b+ CD11c−:CD206− F4/80+CD11b+ CD11c−) was increased after LPS treatment in MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs, as assessed using flow cytometry (Fig. 9, C-D).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Macrophage autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) deletion alters the inflammatory phenotype and polarization in BMDMs in response to lipopolysaccharides (LPS). (A) Atg5 mRNA levels in BMDMs from WT and MΦ atg5−/− mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, n = 3 per group, **** P < 0.0001. Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (B) Western blot analysis of the relative density of LC3-II;/I; in WT and MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs following stimulation with 1 Âµg/mL LPS for 4 h. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, n = 4 per group, **** P < 0.0001. Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. (C) The mRNA levels of TNFα, Il6, iNOS, and TGFβ1 in MΦ atg5−/−BMDMs compared with those of WT BMDMs following stimulation with 1 Âµg/mL LPS. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 **** P < 0.0001 versus vehicle-treated WT BMDMs; ## P < 0.01, #### P < 0.0001 for LPS-treated WT BMDMs (n = 4 per group). (D) Flow cytometric analysis showing the M1/M2 ratio of macrophage polarization in BMDMs isolated from MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice in response to LPS treatment. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 (n = 4 per group). Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple-comparison test

Full size image

Discussion

This study showed that Atg5 deletion in myeloid cells did not affect renal function in the early stages following mild ischemic injury but inhibited renal fibrosis development after severe AKI. Myeloid-specific Atg5 deletion also reduced macrophage recruitment to the injured kidneys in vivo at each time point after AKI and inhibited the macrophage migration capacity in vitro. However, treatment with CCL20 significantly inhibited the chemotactic response of BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− mice compared with those from WT mice, which was associated with PI3K-AKT signaling pathway activation. Moreover, we stimulated the BMDMs of MΦ atg5−/− mice and WT mice with LPS and found that Atg5 deletion inhibited LPS-induced profibrotic cytokine (TGFβ1) expression but increased proinflammatory cytokines (Il6,TNFα, and iNOS), indicating that Atg5 deletion promoted macrophages into an antifibrotic phenotype.

Our results showed that renal macrophage migration was significantly lower throughout the experiment in MΦ atg5−/− mice than in WT mice. Macrophages are well known to be recruited by chemokines and accumulate to participate in renal pathogenesis [25, 26]. The CCR6-CCL20 axis participates in the chemoattraction of immune cells, and increased CCL20 drives the recruitment of CCR6+ immune cells into the injured kidney and plays an important role in kidney injury and repair in AKI and CKD. During AKI, kidney CCL20 is increased in damaged tubules and interstitial cells, and some studies have reported a relationship between tubular and urinary CCL20 and the severity of AKI in humans [27, 28]. Consistently, we also observed CCL20 upregulation in the kidneys of AKI and UUO mice. Therefore, we demonstrated for the first time that Atg5 deficiency decreased CCR6 expression in macrophages to postischemic kidneys. More importantly, we found that renal CCL20 mRNA level was significantly lower in MΦ atg5−/− mice than in WT mice at 28 days after AKI, which was also observed 14 days after UUO. However, lower CCL20 levels may further weaken macrophage recruitment. In vitro migration showed that the CCL20 chemoattractant was inhibited in atg5−/− BMDMs, whereas the CXCL3 chemoattractant was not different between MΦ atg5−/− and WT mice, suggesting that the CCR6-CCL20 axis was required for macrophage migration to the site of the injured kidney (Figure S3).

Autophagy is a dynamic cellular degradation process that maintains intracellular homeostasis by eliminating dysfunctional proteins and organelles using autolysosomes [14]. A considerable amount of evidence has shown that autophagy-dependent motility or migration varies with context-specific or different disease stages [29,30,31,32,33]. In solid tumor studies, the knockdown of Atg5 and Atg7 attenuated the recruitment of monocytes/macrophages [34]. However, the suppression or promotion of macrophage migration into the injured kidney by autophagy is still unclear. Evidence has shown that autophagy-related genes are associated with the CCL20-CCR6 axis [35,36,37]. In this experiment, we found that macrophage migration was decreased in myeloid Atg5-deleted mice, which was associated with impairment of the CCL20-CCR6 axis. Additionally, some studies found that diminished chemokine responses impair the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway and inhibit macrophage recruitment [24, 38].Consistently, our results confirmed that reduced CCL20 chemokine responses in MΦ atg5−/− BMDMs inhibited PI3K, AKT, and ERK phosphorylation.

Autophagy can regulate M1/M2 macrophage polarization. However, in acute liver injury, macrophage autophagy inhibits the number of M1 macrophages and promotes M2 polarization [39, 40]. In obese mice, macrophage autophagy was generally impaired, and this increased pro-inflammatory M1 levels and decreased anti-inflammatory M2 polarization [41]. However, isoproterenol promoted the polarization of M2 macrophages by downregulating autophagy [42], and Brucella infection was found to inhibit the polarization of M1 and M2 macrophages by inducing autophagy associated with microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta [43]. In a pulmonary fibrosis model, blocking macrophage autophagy protected against alveolar fibrosis by regulating the polarization of macrophages toward the M2 phenotype [44]. Zhang et al. found that the activation of macrophage autophagy by rapamycin can inhibit M1 macrophage polarization and increase renal fibrosis progression [45]. Therefore, the discrepancy in the above results is possibly due to the following reasons: different disease types, tissue specialties, time phases, and insufficient specific and accurate autophagy interventions. In our in vivo study, although flow cytometry results revealed that the M1/M2 ratio of macrophages was increased by Atg5 deficiency, the absolute numbers of both M1 and M2 macrophages were decreased.

Additionally, BMDMs from MΦ atg5−/− mice promoted M1 polarization of macrophages in response to LPS stimulation in our in vitro study: Atg5 deletion increased LPS-induced proinflammatory factors (Il6, TNF α, and iNOS) and inhibited profibrotic cytokine (TGFβ1) expression. Previous studies have shown that macrophage-derived TGFβ1 promotes renal fibrosis [46,47,48]. Therefore, our study confirmed that Atg5 deficiency promoted the conversion of macrophages to an antifibrotic phenotype, consequently alleviating renal fibrosis. It is well established that the classification of M2 macrophages is complex. However, based on the secretion of different cytokines, M2 macrophages can be subdivided into M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d [49]. Although some studies suggest that the CD206+ subset of M2 macrophages is related to renal fibrosis, scarce information exists regarding the activated marker of M2, which is a particular phenotype that exacerbates or improves fibrosis [25, 50]. Notably, many intermediate phenotypes and subgroups may coexist in renal tissue. However, current technology still does not allow precise differentiation between these diverse functional subgroups of CKD progression.

Conclusions

In summary, this study revealed that specific deletion of Atg5 in myeloid cells protects against renal fibrosis development by attenuating macrophage migration into the injured kidney. Decreased recruitment of Atg5 KO macrophages is largely due to the impaired CCL20-CCR6 axis, consequently inhibiting the PI3K-AKT pathway. However, the detailed mechanism by which Atg5-mediated macrophage migration depends on the CCL20-CCR6 axis requires further investigation. Nevertheless, these findings demonstrate that Atg5 deletion reduces macrophage migration and changes macrophages into an antifibrotic phenotype that improves fibrosis. Therefore, our findings should be further verified in humans in clinical settings. Furthermore, we predict that there will be different responses between humans and rodents by virtue of the differences in immune cell proportions and markers. However, exploring interventions for specific autophagy and related pathways will hopefully further clarify the complex role of autophagy in immune cells and promote the application of these findings in treating AKI and CKD in the future.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AKI:

acute kidney injury

AKT:

thymoma viral proto-oncogene 1

Atg5 :

autophagy related 5

BMDMs:

bone marrow-derived monocytes

BUN:

blood urea nitrogen

CCL20:

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20

CKD:

chronic kidney disease

CMFDA:

5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate

CXCR:

chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor

ERK:

extracellular signalregulated protein kinase

FN1:

fibronectin 1

I/R:

ischemia-reperfusion

Il:

interleukin

iNOS:

inducible nitric oxide synthase

KO:

knockout

LPS:

lipopolysaccharide

MAPK:

mitogen-activated protein kinase

MΦ atg5 −/− :

myeloid cell-specific atg5 knockout

PBS:

phosphate-buffered saline

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

PI3K:

phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1

SR:

Sirius red; TGFβ1:transforming growth factor β1

TNFα:

tumor necrosis factor

UUO:

unilateral ureteral obstruction

WT:

wild-type

α-SMA:

actin alpha 2

References

  1. Zuk A, Bonventre JV. Acute kidney Injury. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:293–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaut JP, Liapis H. Acute kidney injury pathology and pathophysiology: a retrospective review. Clin Kidney J. 2020;14(2):526–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrar A. Acute kidney Injury. Nurs Clin North Am. 2018;53(4):499–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. He L, et al. AKI on CKD: heightened injury, suppressed repair, and the underlying mechanisms. Kidney Int. 2017;92(5):1071–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurzhagen JT, et al. AKI: an increasingly recognized risk factor for CKD development and progression. J Nephrol. 2020;33(6):1171–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rockey DC, et al. Fibrosis–a common pathway to organ injury and failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(12):1138–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duann P, et al. Autophagy, Innate Immunity and Tissue Repair in Acute kidney Injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(5):662.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Clements M, et al. Differential Ly6C expression after renal ischemia-reperfusion identifies unique macrophage populations. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(1):159–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Day YJ, et al. Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and adenosine 2A receptor-mediated tissue protection: role of macrophages. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2005;288(4):F722–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang F, et al. Deficiency of IKKα in Macrophages mitigates fibrosis progression in the kidney after Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Immunol Res. 2021;2021:5521051.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lever JM, et al. Resident macrophages reprogram toward a developmental state after acute kidney injury. JCI Insight. 2019;4(2):e125503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dikic I, Elazar Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(6):349–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu L, et al. Autophagy pathway: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. Autophagy. 2018;14(2):207–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gong L, Pan Q, Yang N. Autophagy and Inflammation Regulation in Acute Kidney Injury [published correction appears in Front Physiol. 2021;11:639938]. Front Physiol. 2020;11:576463.

  15. Takahashi A, et al. Autophagy guards against cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:517–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu S, et al. Autophagyplays a critical role in kidney tubule maintenance, aging and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Autophagy. 2012;8:826–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kimura T, et al. Autophagy protects the proximal tubule from degeneration and acute ischemicinjury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:902–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Baisantry A, et al. Autophagy induces prosenescent changes in proximal tubular S3 segments. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:1609–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wang S. The role of rapamycin in healthspan extension via the delay of organ aging. Ageing Res Rev 2021;70:101376.

  20. Zhang Y, et al. Lymphangiogenesis in renal fibrosis arises from macrophages via VEGF-C/VEGFR3-dependent autophagy and polarization. Cell Death Discovery. 2021;12(1):109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao J, et al. Ursolic acid exhibits anti-inflammatory effects through blocking TLR4-MyD88 pathway mediated by autophagy. Cytokine. 2019;123:154726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chung S, et al. TGF-β promotes fibrosis after severe acute kidney injury by enhancing renal macrophage infiltration. JCI Insight. 2018;3(21):e123563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zlotnik A, Yoshie O. The chemokine superfamily revisited. Immunity. 2012;36(5):705–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasaki K, et al. Deletion of Myeloid Interferon Regulatory Factor 4 (Irf4) in mouse model protects against kidney fibrosis after ischemic Injury by decreased macrophage recruitment and activation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(5):1037–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang PM, et al. Macrophages: versatile players in renal inflammation and fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(3):144–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ricardo SD, et al. Macrophage diversity in renal injury and repair. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(11):3522–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. González-Guerrero C et al. CCL20 blockade increases the severity of nephrotoxic folic acid-induced acute kidney injury. J Pathol 2018;246(2):191–204.

  28. Nishihara K, et al. Urinary chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (monocyte chemotactic protein-1) as a tubular injury marker for early detection of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85(4):570–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kadandale P, et al. Conserved role for autophagy in Rho1-mediated cortical remodeling and blood cell recruitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(23):10502–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Holm TM, et al. Inhibition of autophagy mitigates cell migration and invasion in thyroid cancer. Surgery. 2022;171(1):235–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh MK, et al. Autophagy is polarized toward Cell Front during Migration and spatially perturbed by Oncogenic Ras. Cells. 2021;10(10):2637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Campisi D, et al. Chemotactic cell migration: the core autophagy protein ATG9A is at the leading edge. Autophagy. 2022;8:3037–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Choi J, et al. Dienogest enhances autophagy induction in endometriotic cells by impairing activation of AKT, ERK1/2, and mTOR. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):655–e641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liao CC, et al. Recombinant protein rVP1 upregulates BECN1-independent autophagy, MAPK1/3 phosphorylation and MMP9 activity via WIPI1/WIPI2 to promote macrophage migration. Autophagy. 2013;9(1):5–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tan J, et al. CCL20/CCR6 axis mediates macrophages to promote proliferation and migration of ESCs by blocking autophagic flux in endometriosis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Poria DK, et al. The STAT3 inhibitor stattic acts independently of STAT3 to decrease histone acetylation and modulate gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhan Z, et al. Autophagy facilitates TLR4- and TLR3-triggered migration and invasion of lung cancer cells through the promotion of TRAF6 ubiquitination. Autophagy. 2014;10(2):257–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Seo M, et al. RNAi-based functional selection identifies novel cell migration determinants dependent on PI3K and AKT pathways. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou S, et al. Spermine alleviates Acute Liver Injury by Inhibiting Liver-Resident macrophage pro-inflammatory response through ATG5-Dependent autophagy. Front Immunol. 2018;9:948.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lodder J, et al. Macrophage autophagy protects against liver fibrosis in mice. Autophagy. 2015;11:1280–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu K, et al. Impaired macrophage autophagy increases the immune response in obese mice by promoting proinflammatory macrophage polarization. Autophagy. 2015;11(2):271–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Shan M, et al. Autophagy suppresses isoprenaline-induced M2 macrophage polarization via the ROS/ERK and mTOR signaling pathway. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;110:432–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang Y, et al. Brucella dysregulates monocytes and inhibits macrophage polarization through LC3-Dependent autophagy. Front Immunol. 2017;8:691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Annangi B, et al. Macrophage autophagy protects mice from cerium oxide nanoparticle-induced lung fibrosis. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2021;18(1):6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang Y, et al. Lymphangiogenesis in renal fibrosis arises from macrophages via VEGF-C/VEGFR3-dependent autophagy and polarization. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(1):109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sapudom J, et al. Fibroblast fate regulation by time dependent TGF-β1 and IL-10 stimulation in biomimetic 3D matrices. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(9):1858–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Border WA, Noble NA. Transforming growth factor beta in tissue fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(19):1286–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Iwano M, et al. Evidence that fibroblasts derive from epithelium during tissue fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(3):341–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Martinez FO, et al. Macrophage activation and polarization. Front Biosci. 2008;13:453–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lis-López L, et al. Is the macrophage phenotype determinant for Fibrosis Development? Biomedicines. 2021;9(12):1747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 31572342], Guangdong Science and Technology Program Project [grant number 2017A030303022], The Nanfang Hospital Dean Fund [grant number 2020NF0016], Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [grant number 2020A1515010981], and the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [grant number 202102080193].

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yufeng Zhu, Jiexing Tan and Yuanzhan Wang contributed equally.

  2. Xiaotao Jiang, Wei Zhu and Li Gong contributed equally.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Experimental Animal Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838, North Guangzhou Avenue, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, China

    Yufeng Zhu, Jiexing Tan, Yuanzhan Wang, Yuhong Gong & Li Gong

  2. State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    Xiaoyong Zhang

  3. College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Ziguo Yuan

  4. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Ziguo Yuan

  5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

    Xinyu Lu, Zhiming Zhang & Wei Zhu

  6. Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Huifang Tang

  7. Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

    Xiaotao Jiang

  8. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Guangzhou, China

    Xiaotao Jiang

Authors
  1. Yufeng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiexing Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuanzhan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuhong Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoyong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ziguo Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xinyu Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huifang Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zhiming Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaotao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wei Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Li Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Li Gong, Yufeng Zhu and Jiexing Tan conceived and designed the research. Li Gong, Jiexing Tan, Yuanzhan Wang, Yuhong Gong, Xinyu Lu, and Zhiming Zhang performed the experiments and analysis. Li Gong, Yufeng Zhu, Jiexing Tan, Yuanzhan Wang, Yuhong Gong, and Xiaoyong Zhang drafted the manuscript. Li Gong, Jiexing Tan and Xinyu Lu drafted the fgures. Li Gong, Jiexing Tan, Xiaotao Jiang, Ziguo Yuan, Huifang Tang and Wei Zhu edited and revised the manuscript. Yufeng Zhu, Li Gong and Xiaotao Jiang acquired funding. The fnal version of the manuscript was approved by all authors after they had reviewed it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Gong.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All experiments using animals were conducted in accordance with the Nanfang Hospital Animal Ethics Committee and the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Tan, J., Wang, Y. et al. Atg5 deficiency in macrophages protects against kidney fibrosis via the CCR6-CCL20 axis. Cell Commun Signal 22, 223 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-024-01600-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-024-01600-2

Keywords

Cell Communication and Signaling

ISSN: 1478-811X