Skip to main content
Download PDF

The Janus-faced role of TRPM2-S in retroperitoneal liposarcoma via increasing ROS levels

Cell Communication and Signaling volume 20, Article number: 128 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) is a specific soft tissue sarcoma with a high recurrence rate. The short isoform of transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 2 (TRPM2-S) plays an important role in the regulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, the association between TRPM2-S and RPLS and its underlying mechanisms remains unclear.

Methods

The expression of both TRPM2-S and TRPM2-L in RPLS tissues was verified by kimmunohistochemistry (IHC). The regulation on Ca2+ influx by TRPM2-S was evaluated by Fluo-4 AM staining. The effect of TRPM2-S on cell proliferation and apoptosis was tested by 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) staining and Flow cytometry respectively. The level of cellular ROS was assessed by the DCFH-DA probe. Different concentrations of H2O2 were used to provide oxidative stress on RPLS cells. The underlying mechanisms were further explored by Western blotting.

Results

The IHC assays showed that TRPM2-S, but not TRPM2-L, was prognostic in RPLS. Low TRPM2-S level was associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS). Calcium influx signal intensity was significantly decreased under TRPM2-S overexpression, which resulted in a decrease in the levels of FOXO3a and PTEN. Correspondingly, the levels of pERK, pAKT, pP65, pGSK-3β, Bcl-2, and β-catenin were upregulated, and cellular ROS was gently increased under TRPM2-S overexpression. Moreover, TRPM2-S slightly promoted cell proliferation and inhibited apoptosis of RPLS cell lines under normoxia, but largely increased apoptosis rates under oxidative stress. The cleaved caspase3 was significantly upregulated by TRPM2-S overexpression under oxidative stress. N-Acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC), a small molecule antioxidant, could largely rescue RPLS cells from the apoptosis induced by H2O2.

Conclusion

TRPM2-S exerts Janus-faced effects in RPLS by increasing the ROS levels via inhibition on FOXO3a, which promotes cell proliferation under normoxia but induces apoptosis under oxidative stress.

Video abstract

Introduction

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) is a kind of soft tissue sarcoma with an incidence of 0.2–0.5 per 100,000 residents [1]. Recently, complete surgical resection (R0) remains the most effective treatment recommended for RPLS patients when feasible [2,3,4,5,6,7]. However, R0 surgical excision is challenging, rendering RPLS an uncontrollable local recurrence rate (LR) [8, 9]. Moreover, the application of both chemotherapy and radiotherapy are under dispute for the treatment of RPLS, and no well-established drug targets have been identified owing to the very limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms of RPLS.

The transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2) is a monovalent and divalent cation-permeable ion (including K+, Na+, and Ca2+) channel with six transmembrane domains [10]. Numerous studies reported that TRPM2 was widely expressed in various tumor cells including neuroblastoma [11], gastric cancer [12], pancreatic cancer [13], acute myeloid leukemia [14], and prostate cancer [15]. TRPM2 accelerated tumor cell proliferation and maintain their survival via multifarious regulation mechanisms, including activating JNK-signaling, motivating PKC/MAPK pathways, and enhancing mitochondrial function by promoting mitophagy and suppressing reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Hitherto, at least four splice variants of TRPM2 have been reported [16,17,18]. The short isoform (TRPM2-S) without the four C-terminal transmembrane domains and the putative Ca2+ pore has been proved to repress the calcium influx through binding to TRPM2-L [18]. However, little is known about the role of TRPM2-S in malignancy, especially in RPLS.

We firstly identified TRPM2 as a key prognostic gene in RPLS from the TCGA-SARC dataset. We found that RPLS patients with higher TRPM2 expression levels showed better DFS. However, the RNA-seq data could not well distinguish the exact expression of different splice variants. Therefore, here we further determined that TRPM2-S was the “real” prognostic biomarker in RPLS by IHC staining with antibodies targeted on different sites of TRPM2. We also constructed RPLS cell lines (94T778 and SW872) stably expressing TRPM2-S to reveal the function of TRPM2-S splice variant and its bipolar function in RPLS via increasing ROS levels.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue specimens

Specimens of RPLS tissues were obtained from patients who underwent surgery during 2016–2019 at the Peking University International Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center. The detailed clinicopathological characteristics of the 98 RPLS patients for immunohistochemical analysis are shown in Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 2: Table S2. The experiments were undertaken with the understanding and written consent of each subject. The study protocol conformed to the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University International Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center (WA2020RW29).

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of the 98 RPLS patients for IHC
Full size table

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

The TRPM2-L and TRPM2-S & -L antibodies for immunohistochemistry were purchased from Abcam (Cat No: ab11168) and Bioss (Cat No: bs-2888R), respectively. With deparaffinization for 15 min × 3 in dimethylbenzene and routine hydration, the tissues were soaked in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) for 10 min and then performed high-pressure antigen retrieval (Tris–EDTA PH = 9.0) for 2.5 min. After being treated with 3% endogenous catalase blocker (ZSBIO, PV-6000) for 10 min, the tissues were incubated in goat serum (ZSBIO, ZLI-9022) for the blocking of nonspecific reaction and then incubated with primary antibody (TRPM2-L = 1:500–1000; TRPM2-L and TRPM2-S = 1:500–2000) at 4 °C overnight. On the next day, tissues were washed routinely and incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (ZSBIO, PV-9000) for 1 h at room temperature, then washed and stained with DAB reagents (ZSBIO, ZLI-9018). Then hematoxylin staining, 1% hydrochloric acid alcohol differentiation, ammonia water anti-blue and neutral gum sealing.

The staining extent was scored as follows: 0, negative; 1, 1–33%; 2, 34–66%; 67–100%. The intensity score was defined as negative, low-expression, medium-expression, and high-expression, which were documented as 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The correlation between TRPM2-L and TRPM2-L & TRPM2-S expression and disease-free survival of RPLS patients was evaluated. The IHC results were evaluated by pathologists, and the final scores were determined by multiplying the intensity score by the extent score.

Cell culture and transfection

The human retroperitoneal liposarcoma cell lines SW872 and 94T778 (separately purchased from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, Shanghai, China) were used in this study. Cells were separately cultured in 90% PRIM-1640 (CORNING) or 90% Leibovitz’s L-15 (CORNING) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), with a temperature at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cell transfection was performed using 5 ul Lipofectamine 3000 (Invtrogen, lot: 2004186) and 1.5 ug plasmids, 4 ul P3000 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The transfection efficiency was confirmed by western blot.

Plasmids and antibodies

pcDNA3.1-TRPM2-S-Flag was synthesized by Youbio Co., Ltd. The following antibodies were used in this study: anti-TRPM2-L rabbit polyclonal antibody (ab11168; Abcam); anti-TRPM2-S & -L rabbit polyclonal antibody (bs-2888R; Bioss); anti-Flag (K200001M; Solarvbio); anti-PTEN (60300-1-Ig; Proteintech); anti-pAKT (66444-1-Ig; Proteintech); anti-pGSK3β (#9327S; Cell signaling technology); anti-β-Caternin (#8480S; Cell signaling technology); anti-NF-Kβ (#3033S; Cell signaling technology); anti-pERK (#4370S; Cell signaling technology); anti-Bcl-2 (#3498S; Cell signaling technology); anti-cleaved caspase3 (#9664S; Cell signaling technology); anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal antibody (60004-1-Ig; Proteintech).

Measurement of intracellular ROS levels

The intracellular ROS levels were measured using a Reactive Oxygen Species Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China); 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA), which is easily oxidized to fluorescent dichlorofluorescein (DCF) by intracellular ROS, is its principal component, and therefore, the ROS levels were quantified. Briefly, the cells were seeded in 6-well plates and transfected with TRPM2-S plasmid. After 48 h later, cells were washed with PBS 3 times and harvested with trypsinization. Then centrifugation and resuspension, and subsequently incubated with DCFH-DA for 20 min at 37 °C. Finally, the cells were re-seeded in 96-well plates (4 × 104 per well and measured at 488 nm excitation and 525 nm emission by a fluorescence spectrophotometer (SpectraMas, USA).

Cytosolic-free calcium measurement

Fluo-4 AM (Beyotime Biotechnology, China) was used to measure intracellular calcium according to the manufacturer’s guideline. Simply, cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-TRPM2-S-Flag and empty vector were seeded in 6-well plates. After 48 h later, cells were washed with PBS 3 times and incubated with Fluo-4 AM working solution for 40 min. Then, cells were washed with PBS three times and harvested with trypsinization. After centrifugation and resuspension, cells were re-seeded in 96-well plates and analyzed the intracellular calcium with fluorescence spectrophotometer (SpectraMas, USA).

EdU cell imaging

1 × 104 cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates 36 h after transfection. After 12 h of culture, 50 uM EdU (Cell Light™ EdU Apollp®643 In Vitro Imaging Kit, Lot: C10310-2) was added and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Excess EdU was eluted with PBS, then after fixation, glycine treatment, membrane permeability, cells were incubated with 300 ul of Apollo staining reaction solution for 30 min with gently shaking in the darkness. After washing with 0.5% Triton-X-100 and methanol enhanced bleaching treatment, the cell nucleus was stained with 1 × Hoechst 33342 reaction solution for 30 min with gently shaking in the darkness. Cells fluorescence was observed using a fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS DP72) and Apollo/Hoechst positive ratio was calculated.

Live-cell imaging

1.5 × 103 cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates 48 h after transfection. Cell proliferation was monitored for at least 50 h by a long-term process live-cell analysis system IncuCyte S3 (Essen Instruments, Ann Arbor, MI, United States). Photographs of cells were taken at 6 h intervals from four separate regions per well with 10 objectives. Values from four regions of each well were pooled and averaged across six replicates.

Western blotting

Proteins for conventional western blotting were obtained by lysing cells in RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) and disruption with gentle sonication (on 3 s/off 3 s for 10 cycles). The protein concentration was confirmed by a bicinchoninic acid Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and was normalized with 5 × loading buffer and ddH2O. Denatured total protein was separated by 10% and 12% SDS/PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked for 2 h at room temperature using 5 and 8% (w/v) milk (skim milk powder in TBST). The proteins were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibody. After washing three times with TBST, the blot was incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature and visualized with an enhance chemiluminescence system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Flow cytometry for apoptosis (Annexin-V & 7-AAD)

Cells were washed with PBS after transfection for 48 h (overexpression group and negative control group with or without 200 umol/L H2O2 and N-Acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) treatment for 24 h to induce or anti-apoptosis) and were then harvested using 0.25% trypsin (all supernatant liquid was collected). After centrifugation (1500 rpm) for 15 min, the supernatant liquid was discarded, and the precipitation was resuspended in 1 mL of binding buffer for another centrifugation. Then, the cells were resuspended in 250 ul of binding buffer, and 5 ul each of annexin V-FITC and 7-AAD-Percp-Cy5.5 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) were added. The cells were analyzed by a FACSVerse (Becton–Dickinson, FranklinLakes, NJ, USA) after incubation in the dark for 15 min.

Propidium iodide (PI) staining for apoptosis

2 × 104 cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates 36 h after transfection. After 12 h of culture, H2O2 with different concentration gradients (including 0, 100, 200, and 300 umol/L) was added and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. then cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 300 ul of Propidium iodide (PI) staining reaction solution for 20 min in darkness. After washing the excess PI, cells fluorescence was observed using fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS DP72) and PI/Cell counts positive ratio was calculated.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 28.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and Prism 9 for Mac OS were used for statistical analysis and visualization. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviations (SDs). Student’s independent t-test was used for statistical comparisons between the experimental and control groups. Kaplan–Meier (K–M) plots was applied to assess and show the difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between subgroups. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Low TRPM2-S expression predicted poor prognosis in RPLS

To identify clinically relevant biomarkers in RPLS, we performed a univariate Cox analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) on 57 RPLS samples from the TCGA-SARC. DFS was chosen for the survival time analysis since the main factor affecting the survival of RPLS patients is the postoperative recurrence rate. We revealed a total of 42 prognostic genes with a P-value < 0.05 (Fig. 1a, Additional file 3: Table S3). As previously we found that adjuvant radiotherapy had positive effects for the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas [19], here we further investigated the RPLS patients who underwent surgery and radiotherapy, respectively. We divided the patients into two subgroups according to whether remission was achieved by radiotherapy (Fig. 1b, Additional file 4: Table S4) to screen out crucial effector genes for radiotherapy. The prognostic genes set (P < 0.05) and differential genes set (FDR < 0.01) were subsequently subjected to intersection analysis to identify genes significant for both prognosis and radiotherapy (Fig. 1c). Two genes (TRPM2 and PPP1R12A) were finally identified. The Kaplan Meier prognostic analysis indicated TRPM2 as a prognostic protective factor and PPP1R12A as a prognostic invasive factor (Fig. 1d, e). Here we selected TRPM2 for subsequent mechanism studies.

Fig. 1
figure 1

RPLS prognostic gene screening from TCGA-SARC. a DFS univariate Cox analysis of TCGA-SARC-RPLS and forest map showed all prognostic genes with P < 0.05. b The volcanic map of TCGA-SARC-ART differential gene analysis, red represents up-regulation and blue represents down-regulation. c Venn of TCGA-SARC-RPLS prognostic gene set (P < 0.05) and TCGA-SARC-ART differential gene set (FDR < 0.01). d Kaplan–Meier analysis of TRPM2 and PPP1R12A in TCGA-SARC-ART

Full size image

Considering TRPM2 has two different transcripts due to alternative splicing (Fig. 2a), we performed IHC staining with antibodies that recognized total TRPM2 (both TRPM2-L & TRPM2-S) and specifically recognized the TRPM2-L variant. The results indicated that patients with higher TRPM2-L & TRPM2-S had a better DFS than those with lower expression (Fig. 2b, P = 0.009), whereas there was no significant difference between patients with high- and low expression of TRPM2-L (Fig. 2c, P = 0.154). Univariate Cox regression suggested that high expression of TRPM2-L & TRPM2-S was associated with longer DFS (Table 2). Based on the above results, we concluded that TRPM2-S, but not TRPM2-L, was the “real” prognostic factor in RPLS patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Validation of the RPLS prognostic gene TRPM2-S. a Schematic diagram of TRPM2 gene and encoded protein isoforms (TRPM2-L and TRPM2-S) (left panel) and membrane topology (right panel). b Representative RPLS staining images with different IHC scores (left panels). Log-rank analysis was performed and showed a higher DFS in the high TRPM2-L & -S expression group (right panels). c Representative RPLS staining images with different IHC scores (left panels). Log-rank analysis was performed and showed DFS was not significantly different between the high TRPM2-L and low TRPM2-S expression groups (right panels)

Full size image
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluating the association between covariates and DFS
Full size table

TRPM2-S suppressed the intracellular flow of calcium ions (Ca 2+ )

To reveal the biological function of TRPM2-S, two human RPLS cell lines (SW872 and 94T778) were transfected with pcDNA3.1-TRPM2-S-Flag, and the TRPM2-S protein expression was assessed by WB. As shown in Fig. 3a, the transfection efficiency was considered feasible. Considering that TRPM2 is a tetrameric cation channel gene, we further evaluated the function of TRPM2-S on the intracellular flow of Ca2+ with Fluo-4 AM reagent. The result showed that the level of cytosolic-free Ca2+ was significantly reduced in RPLS cells with TRPM2-S overexpression (Fig. 3b). These results demonstrated that TRPM2-S could suppress the intracellular flow of Ca2+.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TRPM2-S promotes proliferation via activating ERK and AKT. a Western blotting indicated TRPM2-S expression in pcDNA3.1-TRPM2-S-Flag cells was obviously higher than in empty vector RPLS cell lines. b TRPM2-S inhibited the intracellular flow of Ca2+. c Growth curves of live-cell imaging showed TRPM2-S-expressing 94T778 and SW872 cells have a higher proliferative capacity than negative control cells. d Representative images of EdU assays (left panels). EdU showed that a significant proliferation rate was observed in TRPM2-S-expressing RPLS cell lines (right panels). e Western blotting revealed that p-Akt, p-GSK3β, β-Catenin, and p-ERK were upregulated, whereas FOXO3a and PTEN were downregulated in TRPM2-S-expressing cells compared with control cells

Full size image

TRPM2-S promoted proliferation and inhibited apoptosis via activating ERK and AKT

To investigate the role of TRPM2-S, EdU, live-cell imaging, and flow cytometry (Annexin-V & 7-AAD staining) were used to evaluate the proliferation and apoptosis of 94T778 and SW872 cells. The EdU and live-cell imaging showed that cells with TRPM2-S overexpression had a higher proliferation rate compared to control cells (Fig. 3c, d). The PI staining and flow cytometry analysis indicated that TRPM2-S overexpression largely decreased the apoptosis rate of RPLS cells (Fig. 4a–c). Moreover, the phosphorylation of both ERK and AKT was significantly upregulated in cells with TRPM2-S overexpression, and other associated proteins (e.g. pGSK3β, β-catenin, pP65, and Bcl-2) were also upregulated (Figs. 3e, 4d). As the direct downstream of TRPM2-controlled intracellular Ca2+ flow, the level of FOXO3a was also significantly downregulated in the cells with TRPM2-S overexpression (Fig. 3e). Considering FOXO3a could regulate both the ERK and AKT signaling via ROS, we also evaluated the ROS level with DCFH-DA, and the result demonstrated that ROS was gently increased in cells with TRPM2-S overexpression compared with control cells (Fig. 5b). Therefore, the above results implied that TRPM2-S promoted proliferation and inhibited apoptosis of RPLS cells via activating ERK and AKT pathways.

Fig. 4
figure 4

TRPM2-S inhibits apoptosis via activating AKT. a–c Representative images of PI staining (a, b) and flow cytometry for apoptosis (c) (left panels), both two analyses showed that apoptosis rate was obviously increased in TRPM2-S-expressing RPLS cells (right panels). d Western blotting revealed that p-Akt, pP65, and Bcl-2 were upregulated in TRPM2-S-expressing RPLS cells compared with control cells

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

TRPM2-S increased the susceptibility to apoptosis of RPLS cells under oxidative stress. a Representative images of PI staining (upper panels), the analysis indicated that the apoptosis rate was significantly higher in TRPM2-H2O2 cells than control-H2O2 cells and had a concentration-dependence property (down panels). b ROS kit assays showed that ROS was gently increased in TRPM2-S-expressing cells but was sharply elevated in TRPM2-H2O2 cells compared with control cells and control-H2O2 cells respectively. c Western blotting revealed that cleaved caspase 3 was upregulated in TRPM2-S-H2O2 RPLS cells compared with control-H2O2 cells

Full size image

TRPM2-S increased the susceptibility to apoptosis of RPLS cells under oxidative stress

Considering the Janus-faced role of ROS in cancer, we also assessed the effects of TRPM2-S on cells with different oxidative stress. PI staining was used to detect the apoptosis rate of RPLS cells treated with different concentrations of H2O2. The results showed that the apoptosis rate was obviously increased in cells with TRPM2 overexpression in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5a) along with a boosting of ROS levels (Fig. 5b). Then, we performed WB to explore the underlying mechanisms. The results demonstrated that cleaved caspase 3 was significantly elevated under TRPM2-S overexpression in a circumstance with high levels of H2O2 (Fig. 5c). These results revealed that TRPM2-S enhanced the apoptosis of RPLS cells by upregulating the level of cleaved caspase 3 under oxidative stress.

NAC appeased the TRPM2-S enhanced apoptosis of RPLS cells under oxidative stress

To further confirm that TRPM2-S enhanced apoptosis via boosting of ROS under oxidative stress, NAC, a small-molecule antioxidant, was used to attenuate the ROS levels of TRPM2-S overexpressing (After inducing oxidative stress with H2O2 for 24 h, the medium was replaced with complete medium and treated with NAC for another 24 h). We detected the apoptosis rate of RPLS cells and found that the apoptosis rate was appeased to the base level by NAC in cells with TRPM2 overexpression under oxidative stress (Fig. 6b–f, h–l). Consistent with the previous results in Fig. 4a–c, the TRPM2-S group showed a lower apoptosis level compared to the control group, while the TRPM2-S-H2O2 group showed a higher apoptosis level compared to the control-H2O2 group (Fig. 6a-d, f–j, l). Moreover, WB assays indicated that the level of cleaved caspase 3 was decreased under NAC treatment (Fig. 6m). Therefore, these results revealed that NAC could appease the TRPM2-S enhanced apoptosis of RPLS cells under oxidative stress.

Fig. 6
figure 6

NAC appeased the TRPM2-S enhanced apoptosis of RPLS cells under oxidative stress. a–e Representative images of flow cytometry for apoptosis, including 94T778-Control (a), 94T778-Control-H2O2 (b), 94T778-TRPM2-S (c), 94T778-TRPM2-S-H2O2 (d), 94T778-TRPM2-S-H2O2-NAC (e). f Analysis of apoptosis rate of 94T778 cell. g–k Representative images of flow cytometry for apoptosis, including SW872-Control (g), SW872-Control-H2O2 (h), SW872-TRPM2-S (i), SW872-TRPM2-S-H2O2 (j), SW872-TRPM2-S-H2O2-NAC (k). l Analysis of apoptosis rate of SW872 cell. m Western blotting revealed that cleaved caspase 3 was upregulated in TRPM2-S-H2O2 RPLS cells but was downregulated in TRPM2-S-H2O2-NAC RPLS cells compared with control-H2O2 and TRPM2-S-H2O2 RPLS cells respectively

Full size image

Discussion

In this report, a new isoform of TRPM2, TRPM2-S was identified and validated from the TCGA database and our REtroperitoneal SArcoma Registry (RESAR) cohort. We demonstrated that TRPM2-S inhibited calcium influx, enhanced cell proliferation, and reduced apoptosis under normoxia but induced apoptosis under oxidative stress. It is noteworthy that TRPM2-S may have a “dual role” in the determination of RPLS cell fate following whether exposure to oxidative stress.

The first major finding of this report is that RPLS patients with high-expression TRPM2-S predict a better DFS. To determine exactly which TRPM2 isoform (TRPM2-L or TRPM2-S) has a prognostic role in RPLS. IHC was performed to validate the gene in RESAR cohort, and antibodies of TRPM2-L and TRPM2-L & TRPM2-S were applied in this analysis due to the lack of antibodies to recognize TRPM2-S alone. Only patients with high expression of TRPM2-L & TRPM2-S had a better DFS, which meant TRPM2-S, not TRPM2-L, was the real prognostic gene.

To evaluate the role of TRPM2-S in cell proliferation and apoptosis, we engineered RPLS cell lines stably expressing either TRPM2-S or empty vector. Our second major finding is that TRPM2-S promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of RPLS cells. It was associated with decreased FOXO3a and PTEN, gently increased ROS, increased pAkt, and pERK. Actually, trends in the alteration of these downstream proteins were consistent with the results reported by Chen et al. They demonstrated that TRPM2-S could promote neuroblastoma cell proliferation by activating ERK, Akt, and increasing the level of Glut1 [20]. Down-regulated levels of PTEN have been associated with increased cell proliferation and have been observed in large amounts of cancers [21,22,23,24]. It is generally recognized that PTEN downregulation accelerates cell proliferation by phosphorylating Akt (pAkt) [25]. In our study, we found that TRPM2-S upregulated FOXO3a-mediated ROS production in RPLS cell lines through inhibiting cation influx. ROS can inactivate PTEN via oxidation, resulting in increased pAkt [26, 27]. Besides, ROS can also increase pERK, which has been reported in many studies [28,29,30]. Our experiments with WB indicated the same results that decreased PTEN, increased pERK, and activated Akt and its downstream molecules (including pAkt/pGSK3β/β-Catenin and pAkt/pP65/Bcl-2). Therefore, we conclude that TRPM2-S promoted proliferation and inhibited apoptosis via activating ERK and AKT.

Different types of cancer cells have been shown to produce higher levels of ROS compared to their normal counterparts [31]. The elevated ROS is thought to be oncogenic, causing damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids, promoting genetic instability and tumorigenesis [32,33,34]. It also acts as signaling molecules in cancers, contributing to abnormal cell growth, metastasis, resistance to apoptosis, angiogenesis, and differentiation block [35, 36]. Our previous discussion showed that ROS plays an extremely role in the pro-proliferation and anti-apoptosis of TRPM2-S. However, it is wide awareness that toxic levels of ROS production in cancers are anti-tumorigenic resulting in an increase of oxidative stress and induction of tumor cell death [37,38,39]. Our third major finding is that TRPM2-S is more susceptible to low concentrations (100–300 umol/L) of H2O2 and induces RPLS cell apoptosis under oxidative stress. We consider that the susceptibility is caused by decreased FOXO3a. Subsequently, the sharply elevated ROS caused by ROS homeostatic imbalance and oxidative stimulation ultimately activates caspase 3 and triggers apoptosis. This is consistent with the previously reported findings, in which TRPM2-S decreased cell survival under oxidative stress conditions by inhibiting Ca2+. In those experiments, TRPM2-S expression inhibited the levels of intracellular antioxidant enzymes (including HIF1/2α, FOXO3a, and SOD1/2) as well as mitochondrial functional proteins (including NDUFA4L2, BNIP3, and Cox4.1/2) [11, 14]. However, the mechanism through TRPM2-S regulating FOXO3a here is not known. Pathways involving reduced Ca2+ influx through TRPM2-S may be involved in the modulation of FOXO3a expression. For example, one mechanism through which decreased Ca2+ influx in TRPM2-S expressing cells could reduce HIF expression by destabilizing HIF-1α. Meanwhile, decreased Ca2+ influx can inactivate calcineurin, which attenuates the dephosphorylation of RACK1, increasing RACK1 dimerization and reducing HIF-α levels by enhancing its ubiquitination and degradation [40]. The reduction of HIF-1/2α revoked the inhibition of Akt activation, impeding the FOXO3a level by accelerating its phosphorylation [41].

Wide excision is the main treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma, but the patient’s perioperative period was prolonged due to the extensive surgical ripples and massive intraoperative blood loss. In this process, ischemia/reperfusion injury and inflammation are two key factors causing oxidative stress [42]. Meanwhile, postoperative radiotherapy also provides a non-negligible pathway for the emergence of oxidative stress [43]. Based on the above inferences, we believe that surgery and radiotherapy lead to a better prognosis for patients with high TRPM2-S expression. Of course, a meticulous clinical cohort study must be designed to validate this finding, which is also the direction of our subsequent in-depth study. Besides, an obvious limitation of this study is that it does not clearly reveal the underlying mechanism of TRPM2-S-induced apoptosis under oxidative stress, but according to a series of reports by Chen et al. [11, 14, 20], we hypothesized that TRPM2-S induced apoptosis via mitochondrial pathway (endogenous apoptotic pathway) under oxidative stress.

Taken together, TRPM2-S promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis via activating PTEN/Akt and ERK but induces apoptosis through reduction of FOXO3a and activation of cleaved caspase 3 under oxidative stress (The molecular mechanism is shown in Fig. 7). The pivotal point for this dual effect shift is whether the ROS concentration crosses its threshold for triggering toxicity. For this reason, therapies used to elevate ROS production may be potentially effective RPLS therapies although it is a rather challenging concept.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Schematic diagram of the molecular mechanism of TRPM2-S in RPLS

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

The datasets and materials used for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

RPLS:

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma

TRPM2-S:

The short isoform of transient receptor potential subfamily M2

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

TRPM2-L:

The full-length of transient receptor potential subfamily M2

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

EdU:

Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine

DFS:

Disease-free survival

FOXO3a:

Forkhead Box O3

PTEN:

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

AKT:

Protein kinase B

pAKT:

Phosphor-AKT

pGSK3β:

Phosphor-glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta

ERK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

pERK:

Phosphor-ERK

pNFKB/p65:

Phosphor-nuclear factor-kappa B

NAC:

N-acety1-l-cysteine

PBS:

Phosphate buffer saline

DCFH-DA:

2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein-diacetate

TCGA:

The cancer genome atlas

SARC:

Sarcoma

RESAR:

Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Registry

References

  1. Binder SC, Katz B, Sheridan B. Retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Ann Surg. 1978;187(3):257–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Datta J, Ecker BL, Neuwirth MG, Geha RC, Fraker DL, Roses RE, et al. Contemporary reappraisal of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected retroperitoneal sarcoma: evidence from a nationwide clinical oncology database and review of the literature. Surg Oncol. 2017;26(2):117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gamboa AC, Gronchi A, Cardona K. Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: an update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):200–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldini EH. Defining the role of radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):857–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma SJ, Oladeru OT, Farrugia MK, Shekher R, Iovoli AJ, Singh AK. Evaluation of preoperative chemotherapy or radiation and overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic, resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2025529.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Péchoux C, Musat E, Baey C, Mokhles HA, Terrier P, Domont J, et al. Should adjuvant radiotherapy be administered in addition to front-line aggressive surgery (FAS) in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma? Ann Oncol. 2013;24(3):832–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gronchi A, Miah AB, Dei Tos AP, Abecassis N, Bajpai J, Bauer S, et al. Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(11):1348–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gronchi A, Strauss DC, Miceli R, Bonvalot S, Swallow CJ, Hohenberger P, et al. Variability in patterns of recurrence after resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS): a report on 1007 patients from the multi-institutional collaborative RPS Working Group. Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):1002–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gronchi A, Miceli R, Shurell E, Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Anaya DA, et al. Outcome prediction in primary resected retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: histology-specific overall survival and disease-free survival nomograms built on major sarcoma center data sets. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(13):1649–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller BA. TRPM2 in cancer. Cell Calcium. 2019;80:8–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen SJ, Hoffman NE, Shanmughapriya S, Bao L, Keefer K, Conrad K, et al. A splice variant of the human ion channel TRPM2 modulates neuroblastoma tumor growth through hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1/2α. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(52):36284–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Almasi S, Kennedy BE, El-Aghil M, Sterea AM, Gujar S, Partida-Sanchez S, et al. TRPM2 channel-mediated regulation of autophagy maintains mitochondrial function and promotes gastric cancer cell survival via the JNK-signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(10):3637–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin R, Bao X, Wang H, Zhu S, Liu Z, Chen Q, et al. TRPM2 promotes pancreatic cancer by PKC/MAPK pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(6):585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen SJ, Bao L, Keefer K, Shanmughapriya S, Chen L, Lee J, et al. Transient receptor potential ion channel TRPM2 promotes AML proliferation and survival through modulation of mitochondrial function, ROS, and autophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(4):247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng X, Sikka SC, Huang L, Sun C, Xu C, Jia D, et al. Novel role for the transient receptor potential channel TRPM2 in prostate cancer cell proliferation. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2010;13(2):195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wehage E, Eisfeld J, Heiner I, Jüngling E, Zitt C, Lückhoff A. Activation of the cation channel long transient receptor potential channel 2 (LTRPC2) by hydrogen peroxide. A splice variant reveals a mode of activation independent of ADP-ribose. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(26):23150–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Orfanelli U, Wenke AK, Doglioni C, Russo V, Bosserhoff AK, Lavorgna G. Identification of novel sense and antisense transcription at the TRPM2 locus in cancer. Cell Res. 2008;18(11):1128–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang W, Chu X, Tong Q, Cheung JY, Conrad K, Masker K, et al. A novel TRPM2 isoform inhibits calcium influx and susceptibility to cell death. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(18):16222–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li X, Wu T, Xiao M, Wu S, Min L, Luo C. Adjuvant therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: a meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16(1):196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen SJ, Zhang W, Tong Q, Conrad K, Hirschler-Laszkiewicz I, Bayerl M, et al. Role of TRPM2 in cell proliferation and susceptibility to oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013;304(6):C548–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Carracedo A, Alimonti A, Pandolfi PP. PTEN level in tumor suppression: how much is too little? Cancer Res. 2011;71(3):629–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Parsons R. Human cancer, PTEN and the PI-3 kinase pathway. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15(2):171–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramaswamy S, Nakamura N, Vazquez F, Batt DB, Perera S, Roberts TM, et al. Regulation of G1 progression by the PTEN tumor suppressor protein is linked to inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(5):2110–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang S, Yu D. PI(3)king apart PTEN’s role in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(17):4325–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salmena L, Carracedo A, Pandolfi PP. Tenets of PTEN tumor suppression. Cell. 2008;133(3):403–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ray PD, Huang BW, Tsuji Y. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling. Cell Signal. 2012;24(5):981–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang L, Wang L, Shi X, Xu S. Chlorpyrifos induces the apoptosis and necroptosis of L8824 cells through the ROS/PTEN/PI3K/AKT axis. J Hazard Mater. 2020;398:122905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zibara K, Zeidan A, Bjeije H, Kassem N, Badran B, El-Zein N. ROS mediates interferon gamma induced phosphorylation of Src, through the Raf/ERK pathway, in MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. J Cell Commun Signal. 2017;11(1):57–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Iiyama M, Kakihana K, Kurosu T, Miura O. Reactive oxygen species generated by hematopoietic cytokines play roles in activation of receptor-mediated signaling and in cell cycle progression. Cell Signal. 2006;18(2):174–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Deng W, Wang Y, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhan X, et al. MICAL1 facilitates breast cancer cell proliferation via ROS-sensitive ERK/cyclin D pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(6):3108–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Panieri E, Santoro MM. ROS homeostasis and metabolism: a dangerous liason in cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(6):e2253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Roy K, Wu Y, Meitzler JL, Juhasz A, Liu H, Jiang G, et al. NADPH oxidases and cancer. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015;128(12):863–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stanicka J, Russell EG, Woolley JF, Cotter TG. NADPH oxidase-generated hydrogen peroxide induces DNA damage in mutant FLT3-expressing leukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(15):9348–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Szatrowski TP, Nathan CF. Production of large amounts of hydrogen peroxide by human tumor cells. Cancer Res. 1991;51(3):794–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sabharwal SS, Schumacker PT. Mitochondrial ROS in cancer: initiators, amplifiers or an Achilles’ heel? Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(11):709–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Moloney JN, Stanicka J, Cotter TG. Subcellular localization of the FLT3-ITD oncogene plays a significant role in the production of NOX- and p22phox-derived reactive oxygen species in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2017;52:34–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ichijo H, Nishida E, Irie K, Dijke P, Saitoh M, Moriguchi T, et al. Induction of apoptosis by ASK1, a mammalian MAPKKK that activates SAPK/JNK and p38 signaling pathways. Science. 1997;275(5296):90–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Moon DO, Kim MO, Choi YH, Hyun JW, Chang WY, Kim GY. Butein induces G(2)/M phase arrest and apoptosis in human hepatoma cancer cells through ROS generation. Cancer Lett. 2010;288(2):204–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dhanasekaran DN, Reddy EP. JNK signaling in apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008;27(48):6245–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu YV, Hubbi ME, Pan F, McDonald KR, Mansharamani M, Cole RN, et al. Calcineurin promotes hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha expression by dephosphorylating RACK1 and blocking RACK1 dimerization. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(51):37064–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hu Z, Wang F, Wu Z, Gu H, Dong N, Jiang X, et al. FOXO3a-dependent up-regulation of Mxi1-0 promotes hypoxia-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells. Cell Signal. 2018;51:233–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stevens JL, Feelisch M, Martin DS. Perioperative oxidative stress: the unseen enemy. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(6):1749–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Srinivas US, Tan BWQ, Vellayappan BA, Jeyasekharan AD. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol. 2019;25:101084.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Ruihan Dong, MBBS (Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University) for helpful discussions. The contributions were not compensated.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Peking University International Hospital Research Grant (YN2019QN11).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Peking University Eighth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 102206, People’s Republic of China

    Xiangji Li, Shixiang Ma, Mengmeng Xiao & Chenghua Luo

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing, 100050, People’s Republic of China

    Xiangji Li, Fanqin Bu, Yu Zhao & Li Min

  3. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20089, Milan, Italy

    Ferdinando Cananzi

Authors
  1. Xiangji Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fanqin Bu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shixiang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ferdinando Cananzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mengmeng Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Li Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chenghua Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XJL contributed to Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing-original draft, and Writing-review and editing. FQB contributed to Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, and Visualization. SXM contributed to Investigation and Data curation. FC contributed to Methodology and Formal analysis. YZ contributed to Writing-review and editing. MMX contributed to Methodology, Writing-original draft, and Funding acquisition. LM contributed to Conceptualization, Resources, Writing-review and editing, and Supervision. CHL contributed to Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, and Writing-review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mengmeng Xiao, Li Min or Chenghua Luo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University International Hospital (WA2020RW29). The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. The detailed clinical characteristics and TRPM2-L-IHC score of RPLS patients.

Additional file 2

. The detailed clinical characteristics and TRPM2-S & L-IHC score of RPLS patients.

Additional file 3

. The DFS-prognostic genes screened by Cox analysis in TCGA-RPLS.

Additional file 4

. The differential genes between the radiotherapy remission group and non-remission group inTCGA-SARC.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Bu, F., Ma, S. et al. The Janus-faced role of TRPM2-S in retroperitoneal liposarcoma via increasing ROS levels. Cell Commun Signal 20, 128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-022-00873-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-022-00873-9

Keywords

Cell Communication and Signaling

ISSN: 1478-811X