Skip to main content
Download PDF

Frizzled class receptor 5 contributes to ovarian cancer chemoresistance through aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1

Cell Communication and Signaling volume 22, Article number: 194 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chemoresistance is associated with tumor relapse and unfavorable prognosis. Multiple mechanisms underlying chemoresistance have been elucidated, including stemness and DNA damage repair. Here, the involvement of the WNT receptor, FZD5, in ovarian cancer (OC) chemoresistance was investigated.

Methods

OC cells were analyzed using in vitro techniques including cell transfection, western blot, immunofluorescence and phalloidin staining, CCK8 assay, colony formation, flowcytometry, real-time PCR, and tumorisphere formation. Pearson correlation analysis of the expression levels of relevant genes was conducted using data from the CCLE database. Further, the behavior of OC cells in vivo was assessed by generation of a mouse xenograft model.

Results

Functional studies in OC cells showed that FZD5 contributes to epithelial phenotype maintenance, growth, stemness, HR repair, and chemoresistance. Mechanistically, FZD5 modulates the expression of ALDH1A1, a functional marker for cancer stem-like cells, in a β-catenin-dependent manner. ALDH1A1 activates Akt signaling, further upregulating RAD51 and BRCA1, to promote HR repair.

Conclusions

Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the FZD5-ALDH1A1-Akt pathway is responsible for OC cell survival, and targeting this pathway can sensitize OC cells to DNA damage-based therapy.

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a highly lethal disease. Incidence and mortality of OC both rank eighth in women [1]. Most patients have poor prognosis due to being diagnosed at a later stage. The mortality-to-incidence ratio in OC is greater than 0.6 [2]. Treatment of OC includes surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and several evolving therapies such as folate receptor targeting and immunotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy is widely used for the treatment of OC, but many patients have resistance to these drugs [3]. Enhancing sensitivity to chemotherapy can prevent or delay OC relapse, and improve patient survival.

Homologous recombination (HR) is an important mechanism for repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) [4, 5]. Various factors, including the recombinase, RAD51, and breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2), play crucial roles in this process. As DSBs seriously threaten genome integrity and stability, HR defects, for example BRCA1/2 mutations, increase the risk of tumorigenesis; however, HR-deficient tumors are sensitive to DNA-damaging agents. In contrast, HR-proficient tumors have enhanced HR repair capacity, and are more tolerant to DNA damage. Therefore, inhibiting HR repair is a feasible strategy to sensitize HR-proficient tumors to DNA-damaging drugs, such as cisplatin and PARP inhibitors (PARPi) [6, 7].

Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are a small subpopulation of cancer cells with self-renewal characteristics, as well as some other features of normal stem cells. CSCs are generally resistant to DNA damage, which facilitates their survival on exposure to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [8, 9]. In OC, ALDH-positive (ALDH+) cells exhibit stem-like characteristics and chemoresistance [10, 11]. Targeting ALDH1A1, a member of the ALDH1 family, suppresses OC initiation and growth, as well as sensitizing OC cells to platinum-based chemotherapeutic drugs [12,13,14]. ALDH1A1 downregulation or inhibition induces DNA damage, indicating that ALDH1A1 contributes to both stemness and DNA damage repair [14, 15].

Cisplatin is the first FDA-approved platinum compound for cancer treatment. Currently, cisplatin is often used in combination with other drugs to treat a variety of human tumors, including OC, lung cancer, breast cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [16]. Cisplatin is able to crosslink with the purine bases on the DNA, causing DNA damage and cell apoptosis. Various biological processes are involved in cisplatin resistance, such as drug efflux, DNA damage repair, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and autophagy [17,18,19,20,21]. In the present study, we identified ALDH1A1 as a downstream effector of the FZD5-β-catenin pathway. Further, we demonstrate that FZD5 promotes stemness and HR repair via ALDH1A1 and Akt, thereby inducing OC cell chemoresistance.

Methods

Cell culture and transfection

OVCAR3, SKOV3 and CAOV3 cells were cultured in DMEM (Hyclone) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37℃. These cells were transfected with shFZD5 lentiviruses (GV112/hU6- MCS-CMV-Puromycin, Genechem, China) to stably knockdown FZD5 expression. Puromycin (2 µg/ml, Sigma) was used to select cells at 48 h after infection. The target sequence for shFZD5-1 is 5′-CGGCATCTTCACGCTGCTCTA-3′, for shFZD5-2 is 5′-GGCCACCTTCCTCATCGACAT-3′, and for control is 5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′. FZD5-knockdowned cells was transfected with ALDH1A1 overexpression plasmid (GV219/CMV-MCS-SV40-Neomycin, Genechem, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Western blot

Cells are lysed using RIPA lysis buffer containing 1% PMSF for 1 h on ice. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000×g for 40 min at 4℃. The protein concentration of the supernatant was determined using a BCA assay. Total protein lysate (30 µg) was separated by gel electrophoresis on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline-Tween 20 (TBST) containing 5% skimmed milk for 2 h at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4℃ overnight. Subsequently, the membranes were washed 3 times with TBST and then incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. The chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (Tanon 5200, Shanghai, China) was applied for the imaging of the target protein expression. The following primary antibodies were used: FZD5 (Cell Signaling Technology, #5266, USA, 1:1000), E-cadherin (Cell Signaling Technology, #3195, USA, 1:1000), ALDH1A1 (Santa Cruz, sc-374,076, USA, 1:500), BRCA1 (Cell Signaling Technology, #9010, USA, 1:1000), RAD51 (Abcam, ab133534, UK, 1:1000), active β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, #8814, USA, 1:1000), Akt (Cell Signaling Technology, #9272, USA, 1:1000), pAkt (Cell Signaling Technology, #9271, USA, 1:1000), pErk1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, #4370, USA, 1:1000), and pJnk1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, #9251, USA, 1:1000).

Immunohistochemistry

25 OC tissues and 7 normal ovarian tissues were collected from Tumor hospital of China medical university with the informed consent of the patients. The use of the specimens for research was approved by Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Tumor hospital of China Medical University (KY20230905). The tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and then sliced into 4 μm sections. Xylene and gradient alcohol were used to deparaffinize and hydrate, respectively. 3% H2O2 was used to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity. Sections were incubated with anti-FZD5 antibody (Abcam, ab75234, UK, 1:200) overnight at 4 °C and corresponding second antibody at 37 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, sections were stained with DAB. Finally, sections were examined under a microscope (Leica, USA, DM2500 LED).

Survival analysis

Correlation of FZD5 with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in OC was analyzed using GSE26193 database at Kaplan-Meier Plotter website (https://kmplot.com/analysis/). Correlation of ALDH1A1 with OS and PFS in OC was analyzed using GSE26712 database at Kaplan-Meier Plotter website.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were inoculated on slides in 24-well plates at 40–50% confluence and grown in an incubator at 37℃ for 24 h, fixed with paraformaldehyde for 20 min and washed with PBS three times. Next, cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min at room temperature, blocked with 5% donkey serum for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibody at 4℃ overnight; the following primary antibodies were used: E-cadherin (Cell Signaling Technology, #3195, USA, 1:200), EPCAM (Immunoway, YM6053, USA, 1:100), γH2AX antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, #9718, USA, 1:400), and active β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, #8814, USA, 1:800). Subsequently, slides were incubated with fluorescent-labeled secondary antibody for 2 h. Nuclei were stained with DAPI in the dark and visualized using a laser scanning confocal microscope.

Phalloidin staining

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. Slides were washed three times with PBS, and incubated with 0.5% Triton X-100, then treated with TRITC-conjugated Phalloidin solution (YEASEN, Shanghai, China) at room temperature for 30 min. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Cell morphology was visualized by laser scanning confocal microscopy.

Correlation analysis of gene expression

Gene expression at mRNA levels was investigated in a panel of human OC cell lines using data from the CCLE database. Correlation analysis of gene expression levels, including those of FZD5, CDH1, EPCAM, ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH1B1, ALDH1L1, and ALDH1L2, was performed using the Pearson statistic.

Cell proliferation assay

Cells (OVCAR3: 103; SKOV3: 2 × 103; CAOV3: 103) were resuspended in 100 µl medium, seeded into 96-well plates, and incubated for the indicated length of time. Then, cells were treated with 10 µl Cell Counting Kit-8 reagent (CCK8, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Japan) and incubated at 37℃ for 4 h. Absorbance values at 450 nm were measured at different time points using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).

Colony formation assay

Cells (2 × 103) were seeded and cultured in 3.5 cm culture dishes for 2 weeks until visible colonies formed. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. Colonies were washed with PBS, stained with 1% crystal violet for 20 min, counted, and photographed.

Cell cycle assay

Cells (1 × 106) were collected, washed with PBS, and fixed with 70% ethanol at 4℃ overnight. Then, cells were treated with 500 µl PI/RNaSeA staining solution (KeyGEN BioTECH, China) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Samples were analyzed using a FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (BD, USA).

Real-time PCR

RNAiso Plus (Takara, China) was added to collected cells to extract total RNA, following the standard instructions. After RNA quantification, reverse transcription was performed with 1 µg RNA using a cDNA synthesis Kit (Takara, RR047A, China). Then, real-time PCR was performed using a TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq II kit (Takara, China) and an ABI PRISM 7300 Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems, USA). GAPDH was used as an internal control. Gene expression was analyzed by the 2−ΔΔ Ct method. The primers used are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers for real-time PCR
Full size table

ALDH+ cell subpopulation assay

Cells (1 × 106) were suspended in 1 ml ALDEFLUOR™ Assay Buffer (STEMCELL Technologies, USA) and 5 µl ALDEFLUOR™ Reagent was added in each tube. Then, the mixture was divided into two equal parts: diethylaminobenzaldehyde was added into one part as negative control. After incubation at 37℃ for 45 min, cells were re-suspended in 500 µl ALDEFLUOR™ Assay Buffer. Samples were analyzed using a FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (BD, USA).

Extreme limiting dilution analysis

Cells (100, 50, 25, 10/well) were cultured in complete MammoCult™ Human Medium (STEMCELL Technologies, USA) in 96-well ultra-low-attachment plates (Corning, USA) for 7 days. Stemness was evaluated using a tool available at https://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda/.

HR repair assay

Cells were transiently co-transfected with DR-GFP and I-SceI plasmids (Genechem, China) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, then cultured for 3 days. The percentage of GFP+ cells was analyzed using a FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (BD, USA).

Cytotoxicity assay

After inoculation into 96-well plates at a density of 5000/well overnight, cells were treated with cisplatin or olaparib at different concentrations for 48 h. Then, cells were treated with 10 µl CCK8 reagent (Dojindo, Japan) and incubated at 37℃ for 4 h. Absorbance values at 450 nm were measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).

Tumorisphere toxicity assay

Cells (5 × 103) were treated with or without cisplatin (5 µM) in complete MammoCult™ Human Medium (STEMCELL Technologies, USA) in 6-well ultra-low-attachment plates (Corning, USA) for 7 days. Tumor spheres were counted in five randomly selected fields.

Apoptosis assay

Cells (1 × 106) were collected and washed with PBS and an Annexin V-PE/7- AAD Apoptosis Kit (KeyGEN BioTECH, China) used to analyze cell apoptosis. Cells were incubated in 500 µL binding buffer with 5 µL 7-AAD at room temperature in the dark for 15 min. The number of apoptotic cells was measured using a FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (BD, USA).

Mice and in vivo analysis

Female BALB/c nude mice (5–6 weeks old, 18–20 g) were purchased from Weitong Lihua (Beijing, China) and maintained in the specific pathogen free-grade facility of the Department of Animal Experimentation of China Medical University. All studies involving mice were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of China Medical University (CMU2021249). After resuspension in 100 µl PBS, 1 × 106 OC cells were injected subcutaneously into the lateral flanks of the mice (n = 5 per group). Tumor volume was calculated using the formula: V = ½ × length × width2. Tumor length and width were measured every 3 days using a Vernier caliper. Four weeks after inoculation, mice were euthanized and the tumors harvested. For in vivo chemo-sensitivity assay, mice were administered cisplatin (5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection) for five consecutive days, once the tumor volume reached approximately 50 mm3.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SD and were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9. Differences were analyzed by two-sided Student’s t-test, or one-way or two-way ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

FZD5 maintains an epithelial phenotype in OC cells

FZD5 expression in human specimens was detected by Immunohistochemistry staining. 22 of 25 OC tissues exhibited positive staining compared to 2 of 7 normal ovarian tissues (Additional file 1, Fig. S1). Higher FZD5 expression was associated with shorter overall survival and progression-free survival in OC (Additional file 1, Fig. S2). Our group previously found that FZD5 is implicated in the maintenance of an epithelial phenotype in gastric and bladder cancers [22, 23]. To explore whether FZD5 functions similarly in OC, three epithelial OC cell lines were stably transfected with FZD5 shRNA lentiviruses. FZD5 knockdown reduced the expression of E-cadherin, a key marker of epithelial phenotype (Fig. 1A, B). Further, FZD5 knockdown also downregulated the expression of EPCAM, a marker of both epithelial and stem-like phenotypes (Fig. 1C). Consistently, FZD5 knockdown induced a morphologic change from epithelial-like to mesenchymal-like (Fig. 1D). Moreover, CCLE database analysis indicated that FZD5 mRNA levels were positively correlated with those of CDH1 (the gene encoding E-cadherin) and EPCAM in OC (Fig. 1E; Additional file 1, Fig. S3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

FZD5 maintains an epithelial phenotype in OC cells. A FZD5 and E-cadherin expression in OC cells detected by western blot. B E-cadherin expression in OC cells detected by immunofluorescence staining; scale bar: 50 μm. C EPCAM expression in OC cells detected by immunofluorescence staining; scale bar: 50 μm. D OC cells stained with phalloidin; scale bar: 50 μm. E CCLE database analysis showing positive correlation of FZD5 and CDH1 mRNA levels in OC.

Full size image

FZD5 promotes OC cell growth

The epithelial phenotype is associated with proliferation of OC cells [24]. Therefore, we next investigated the role of FZD5 in OC cell growth. As shown by CCK8 and colony formation tests, FZD5 knockdown slowed cell proliferation, and reduced the formation of cell colonies (Fig. 2A, B; Additional file 1, Fig. S4). Further, FZD5 knockdown decreased the fraction of cells in S-phase, while increasing that in G1-phase, indicating that FZD5 affects the entry of cells into S-phase (Fig. 2C). Next, SKOV3 cells were inoculated into immune-deficient mice, to further evaluate the effect of FZD5 on cell growth. Our data demonstrate that xenograft tumors from cells with FZD5 knocked down grew more slowly than those from control cells (Fig. 2D, E). Together, these results demonstrate that FZD5 facilitates OC growth.

Fig. 2
figure 2

FZD5 promotes OC cell growth. A Cell viability analyzed by CCK8 assay (mean ± SD, n = 3). B Growth of OVCAR3 cells determined by colony formation assay (mean ± SD, n = 3). C Cell cycle of OVCAR3 cells analyzed by flow cytometry. D, E Growth curves of xenograft tumors from SKOV3 cells (mean ± SD, n = 5)

Full size image

FZD5 induces stem-like properties in OC cells

Our previous study revealed that FZD5 modulates ALDH+ stem-like cells in breast cancer [25]. To identify the ALDH1 family member targeted by FZD5 in OC, we conducted correlation analysis using data from the CCLE database. Among five members of the ALDH1 family, including ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH1B1, ALDH1L1, and ALDH1L2, levels of FZD5 were positively correlated with those of ALDH1A1 (Additional file 1, Fig. S5). Next, we examined ALDH1A1 expression in OC cells. As expected, FZD5 knockdown led to downregulation of ALDH1A1 at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 3A, B). Consistent with this finding, FZD5 knockdown diminished the ALDH+ stem-like subpopulation (Fig. 3C, D). Further, extreme limiting dilution analysis demonstrated that FZD5 knockdown attenuated OC cell stemness (Fig. 3E-G).

Fig. 3
figure 3

FZD5 induces stem-like properties in OC. A, B ALDH1A1 expression in OC cells detected by real-time PCR and western blot (mean ± SD, n = 3). C, D Proportion of ALDH+ cells detected by flow cytometry (mean ± SD, n = 3). E–G Stemness of OVCAR3 cells analyzed by extreme limiting dilution mammosphere formation assay

Full size image

FZD5 enhances HR repair capacity

ALDH1A1 is involved in DNA damage repair in OC [14, 15, 26]; therefore, we next assessed whether FZD5 plays a role in this process. After treatment with the DNA-damaging drug, cisplatin, cells with FZD5 knocked down displayed more γ-H2AX staining than control cells, demonstrating that FZD5 knockdown impaired DNA repair following DNA damage (Fig. 4A, B). To assess whether FZD5 modulates HR repair, OC cells were co-transfected with I-SceI and DR-GFP plasmids. The fraction of GFP+ cells in cells with FZD5 knocked down was significantly lower than that in control cells, indicating that FZD5 knockdown disrupted HR repair (Fig. 4C, D). Mechanistically, FZD5 knockdown reduced the expression of RAD51 and BRCA1, two key factors involved in HR repair (Fig. 4E, F).

Fig. 4
figure 4

FZD5 enhances HR repair capacity. A, B γ-H2AX expression in OC cells detected by immunofluorescence staining 24 h after treatment with cisplatin (5 µM) (mean ± SD, n = 3); scale bar: 100 μm. C, D HR repair of OC cells analyzed by flow cytometry (mean ± SD, n = 3). E, F BRCA1 and RAD51 expression in OC cells detected by real-time PCR and western blot (mean ± SD, n = 3)

Full size image

FZD5 endows OC cells with chemoresistance

Both stemness and HR repair are related to therapeutic resistance. Therefore, the role of FZD5 in chemoresistance was subsequently evaluated. Relative to control cells, cells with FZD5 knocked down exhibited higher sensitivity to cisplatin (Fig. 5A, Additional file 1, Fig. S6A). HR-deficient cells are sensitive to PARPi due to synthetic lethality. Indeed, FZD5 knockdown sensitized OC cells to olaparib (Fig. 5B, Additional file 1, Fig. S6B). Further, FZD5 knockdown worked with cisplatin treatment to inhibit mammosphere formation, indicating that targeting FZD5 also can increase the sensitivity of ovarian CSCs to DNA-damaging agents (Fig. 5C). Moreover, FZD5 knockdown remarkably increased cisplatin-induced apoptosis (Fig. 5D). Finally, FZD5 knockdown also worked with cisplatin treatment to suppress the growth of xenograft tumors (Fig. 5E, F).

Fig. 5
figure 5

FZD5 endows OC cells with chemoresistance. A Viability of OC cells 48 h after treatment with cisplatin analyzed by CCK8 assay (mean ± SD, n = 3). B Viability of OC cells 48 h after treatment with olaparib analyzed by CCK8 assay (mean ± SD, n = 3). C Mammosphere formation of OVCAR3 cells treated with or without cisplatin (10 µM) (mean ± SD, n = 3). D Apoptosis of OVCAR3 cells treated with or without cisplatin (10 µM) detected by flow cytometry (mean ± SD, n = 3). E, F Growth curves of OVCAR3-xenograft tumors treated with or without cisplatin (5 mg/kg) (mean ± SD, n = 5)

Full size image

ALDH1A1 is a downstream effector of FZD5 in OC

FZD5 mediates both β-catenin-dependent and -independent pathways [27]. In OC cells, FZD5 knockdown downregulated the expression of active β-catenin, indicating that FZD5 can activate the β-catenin pathway (Fig. 6A, B; Additional file 1, Fig. S7). Treatment with XAV939, a β-catenin inhibitor, sensitized OC cells to cisplatin (Additional file 1, Fig. S8). To determine whether FZD5 modulation of ALDH1A1 is dependent on β-catenin, we transfected OC cells with siRNAs targeting CTNNB1, the gene encoding β-catenin. CTNNB1 knockdown downregulated ALDH1A1 at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 6C). To determine whether ALDH1 mediates FZD5-induced HR repair and chemoresistance, ALDH1A1 was overexpressed in cells with FZD5 knocked down. Our data demonstrate that ALDH1 overexpression restored the expression of RAD51 and BRCA1, as well as DNA damage repair capacity (Fig. 6D, E). Furthermore, cells with FZD5 knocked down and ALDH1A1 overexpression regained resistance to cisplatin and olaparib (Fig. 6F). Finally, higher ALDH1A1 expression was associated with shorter overall survival and progression-free survival in OC (Additional file 1, Fig. S9).

Fig. 6
figure 6

ALDH1A1 is a downstream effector of FZD5. A Active β-catenin expression in OC cells detected by western blot. B Active β-catenin expression in OVCAR3 cells detected by immunofluorescence staining; scale bar: 50 μm. C ALDH1A1 and active β-catenin expression in OC cells detected by real-time PCR and western blot (mean ± SD, n = 3). D ALDH1A1, BRCA1, and RAD51 expression in OVCAR3 cells with FZD5 knocked down detected by western blot. E γ-H2AX expression in OVCAR3 cells with FZD5 knocked down detected by immunofluorescence staining 24 h after treatment with cisplatin (5 µM) (mean ± SD, n = 3); scale bar: 100 μm. F Viability of OVCAR3 cells with FZD5 knocked down 48 h after treatment with cisplatin or olaparib analyzed by CCK8 assay (mean ± SD, n = 3)

Full size image

The FZD5-ALDH1A1 pathway activates akt signaling

To elucidate the signaling downstream of the FZD5-ALDH1A1 pathway in OC cells, we analyzed the phosphorylation of Akt, Jnk, and Erk. FZD5 knockdown repressed the phosphorylation of Akt, but had no effect on that of Jnk or Erk (Fig. 7A). Overexpression of ALDH1A1 in cells with FZD5 knocked down restored the expression of phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, treatment of OC cells with NCT-501, an ALDH1A1 inhibitor, reduced pAkt, BRCA1 and RAD51 expression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7C). Next, to investigate whether Akt signaling is related to HR repair, OC cells were treated with the Akt inhibitor, MK-2206. Treatment with MK-2206 decreased the expression of BRCA1 and RAD51, as well as DNA damage repair capacity in OC cells (Fig. 7D, E). These results indicate that the FZD5-ALDH1A1-Akt pathway is responsible for HR repair in OC cells (Fig. 7F).

Fig. 7
figure 7

The FZD5-ALDH1A1 pathway activates Akt signaling. A pAkt, Akt, pJnk, Jnk, pErk, and Erk expression in OC cells detected by western blot. B pAkt and Akt expression in OVCAR3 cells with FZD5 knocked down detected by western blot. C pAkt, Akt, BRCA1, and RAD51 expression in OC cells 48 h after treatment with NCT-501 detected by western blot. D pAkt, Akt, BRCA1, and RAD51 expression in OC cells 48 h after treatment with MK-2206 detected by western blot. E γ-H2AX expression in OVCAR3 cells detected by immunofluorescence staining 24 h after treatment with cisplatin (5 µM) (mean ± SD, n = 3); scale bar: 100 μm. F Schematic showing the FZD5-ALDH1A1-Akt pathway

Full size image

Discussion

Frizzled (FZD) molecules belong to the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, which contain a highly conserved cysteine-rich domain (CRD). Extracellular WNT molecules bind to the CRD to trigger both the canonical β-catenin pathway and various β-catenin-independent pathways. There are 10 members in the human FZD family, FZD1–FZD10, and FZD proteins are involved in many human diseases, affecting almost every aspect of tumor development, including tumorigenesis, growth, metastasis, chemoresistance, and recurrence [27]. In this study, we provide the first report of the role of FZD5 in OC chemoresistance.

We found that FZD5 sustains the epithelial phenotype of OC cells through modulation of E-cadherin and EPCAM. It is established that E-cadherin functions as a negative regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), thus blocking tumor cell invasion and migration; however, E-cadherin has also been demonstrated to facilitate tumor progression [28, 29]. In OC, E-cadherin promotes cell proliferation and chemoresistance [24, 30]. EPCAM is an epithelial and stem-like dual marker, and EPCAM-high/positive OC cells are more tolerant to chemotherapy than those with an EPCAM-low/negative phenotype [31].

There are two types of CSC in breast cancer, mesenchymal-like and epithelial-like [32, 33]. Mesenchymal-like CSCs are CD24−CD44+, quiescent, and motile, due to high expression of mesenchymal markers, such as vimentin. Epithelial CSCs are ALDH+ and EPCAM+, proliferative, and immotile, because of high expression of E-cadherin. Ovarian CSCs exhibit similar heterogeneity [34]. A subpopulation of ovarian CSCs express CD44 and TGFβ1, and are characterized by EMT [35, 36]. As a negative regulator of TGFβ1 signaling, SMAD7 maintains the epithelial phenotype of ovarian CSCs, and promotes their colonization of metastatic sites by inducing mesenchymal-epithelial transition [37].

Our study reveals that FZD5 upregulates E-cadherin and EPCAM, as well as ALDH1A1, in OC, indicating that FZD5 maintains OC CSCs in an epithelial-like state. Consistently, FZD5 promotes cell growth, stemness, and chemoresistance. Further, we found that ALDH1A1 induces HR repair via Akt, which upregulates the HR factors, RAD51 and BRCA1. ALDH1A1 was also shown to activate Akt signaling in non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [38, 39]; however, the mechanism by which ALDH1A1 induces Akt phosphorylation is unknown.

Conclusions

In summary, FZD5 induces stemness and HR repair, thereby endowing OC cells with resistance to DNA-damaging agents. Mechanistically, FZD5 promotes ALDH1A1 expression in a β-catenin-dependent manner. ALDH1A1 then activates Akt signaling, upregulating RAD51 and BRCA1 to enhance HR repair. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the FZD5-ALDH1A1-Akt pathway contributes to OC chemoresistance, and that targeting this pathway has potential to sensitize OC cells to DNA damage-based therapy (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

FZD5-ALDH1A1-Akt pathway in OC. FZD5 upregulates ALDH1A1 expression in a β-catenin-dependent manner. ALDH1A1 activates Akt signaling to enhance HR repair by upregulating RAD51 and BRCA1.

Full size image

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CRD:

Cysteine rich domain

CSC:

Cancer stem like cells

DSB:

Double strand breaks

EMT:

Epithelial mesenchymal transition

GPCR:

G protein coupled receptor

HR:

Homologous recombination

OC:

Ovarian cancer

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lheureux S, Braunstein M, Oza AM. Epithelial ovarian cancer: evolution of management in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(4):280–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis A, Tinker AV, Friedlander M. Platinum resistant ovarian cancer: what is it, who to treat and how to measure benefit? Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(3):624–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun Y, McCorvie TJ, Yates LA, Zhang X. Structural basis of homologous recombination. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(1):3–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright WD, Shah SS, Heyer WD. Homologous recombination and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(27):10524–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu G, Yang D, Rupaimoole R, Pecot CV, Sun Y, Mangala LS, Li X, Ji P, Cogdell D, Hu L et al. Augmentation of response to chemotherapy by microRNA-506 through regulation of RAD51 in serous ovarian cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107(7):djv108.

  7. Zhou Q, Huang J, Zhang C, Zhao F, Kim W, Tu X, Zhang Y, Nowsheen S, Zhu Q, Deng M, et al. The bromodomain containing protein BRD-9 orchestrates RAD51-RAD54 complex formation and regulates homologous recombination-mediated repair. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vitale I, Manic G, De Maria R, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. DNA damage in stem cells. Mol Cell. 2017;66(3):306–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pilzecker B, Buoninfante OA, Jacobs H. DNA damage tolerance in stem cells, ageing, mutagenesis, disease and cancer therapy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(14):7163–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y, Zhao G, Condello S, Huang H, Cardenas H, Tanner EJ, Wei J, Ji Y, Li J, Tan Y, et al. Frizzled-7 identifies platinum-tolerant ovarian Cancer cells susceptible to Ferroptosis. Cancer Res. 2021;81(2):384–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo F, Yang Z, Sehouli J, Kaufmann AM. Blockade of ALDH in Cisplatin-resistant ovarian Cancer stem cells in Vitro synergistically enhances Chemotherapy-Induced cell death. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(4):2808–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Landen CN Jr., Goodman B, Katre AA, Steg AD, Nick AM, Stone RL, Miller LD, Mejia PV, Jennings NB, Gershenson DM, et al. Targeting aldehyde dehydrogenase cancer stem cells in ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9(12):3186–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yokoyama Y, Zhu H, Lee JH, Kossenkov AV, Wu SY, Wickramasinghe JM, Yin X, Palozola KC, Gardini A, Showe LC, et al. BET inhibitors suppress ALDH Activity by Targeting ALDH1A1 Super-enhancer in Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76(21):6320–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nwani NG, Condello S, Wang Y, Swetzig WM, Barber E, Hurley T, Matei D. A novel ALDH1A1 inhibitor targets cells with stem cell characteristics in ovarian cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11(4):502.

  15. Meng E, Mitra A, Tripathi K, Finan MA, Scalici J, McClellan S, Madeira da Silva L, Reed E, Shevde LA, Palle K, et al. ALDH1A1 maintains ovarian cancer stem cell-like properties by altered regulation of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair network signaling. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e107142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dasari S, Tchounwou PB. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;740:364–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo C, Song C, Zhang J, Gao Y, Qi Y, Zhao Z, Yuan C. Revisiting chemoresistance in ovarian cancer: mechanism, biomarkers, and precision medicine. Genes Dis. 2022;9(3):668–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Qin Y, Ashrafizadeh M, Mongiardini V, Grimaldi B, Crea F, Rietdorf K, Győrffy B, Klionsky DJ, Ren J, Zhang W, et al. Autophagy and cancer drug resistance in dialogue: pre-clinical and clinical evidence. Cancer Lett. 2023;570:216307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo Z, Ashrafizadeh M, Zhang W, Zou R, Sethi G, Zhang X. Molecular profile of metastasis, cell plasticity and EMT in pancreatic cancer: a pre-clinical connection to aggressiveness and drug resistance. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2023.

  20. Yang Y, Liu L, Tian Y, Gu M, Wang Y, Ashrafizadeh M, Reza Aref A, Cañadas I, Klionsky DJ, Goel A, et al. Autophagy-driven regulation of cisplatin response in human cancers: exploring molecular and cell death dynamics. Cancer Lett. 2024;587:216659.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cornelison R, Llaneza DC, Landen CN. Emerging therapeutics to overcome chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer: a mini-review. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18(10):2171.

  22. Dong D, Na L, Zhou K, Wang Z, Sun Y, Zheng Q, Gao J, Zhao C, Wang W. FZD5 prevents epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. Cell Commun Signal. 2021;19(1):21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Na L, Wang Z, Bai Y, Sun Y, Dong D, Wang W, Zhao C. WNT7B represses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem-like properties in bladder urothelial carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2022;1868(1):166271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong LL, Liu L, Ma CH, Li JS, Du C, Xu S, Han LH, Li L, Wang XW. E-cadherin promotes proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells in vitro via activating MEK/ERK pathway. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33(6):817–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun Y, Wang Z, Na L, Dong D, Wang W, Zhao C. FZD5 contributes to TNBC proliferation, DNA damage repair and stemness. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(12):1060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu L, Cai S, Han C, Banerjee A, Wu D, Cui T, Xie G, Zhang J, Zhang X, McLaughlin E, et al. ALDH1A1 contributes to PARP inhibitor resistance via enhancing DNA repair in BRCA2(-/-) ovarian Cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19(1):199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun Y, Wang W, Zhao C. Frizzled receptors in tumors, focusing on signaling, roles, modulation mechanisms, and targeted therapies. Oncol Res. 2021;28(6):661–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Roque R, Costa Sousa F, Figueiredo-Dias M. Epithelial-mesenchymal interconversions in ovarian cancer: the levels and functions of E-cadherin in intraabdominal dissemination. Oncol Rev. 2020;14(2):475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hu QP, Kuang JY, Yang QK, Bian XW, Yu SC. Beyond a tumor suppressor: Soluble E-cadherin promotes the progression of cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(12):2804–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun Y, Li S, Yang L, Zhang D, Zhao Z, Gao J, Liu L. CDC25A facilitates chemo-resistance in Ovarian Cancer Multicellular spheroids by promoting E-cadherin expression and arresting cell cycles. J Cancer. 2019;10(13):2874–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tayama S, Motohara T, Narantuya D, Li C, Fujimoto K, Sakaguchi I, Tashiro H, Saya H, Nagano O, Katabuchi H. The impact of EpCAM expression on response to chemotherapy and clinical outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(27):44312–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu S, Cong Y, Wang D, Sun Y, Deng L, Liu Y, Martin-Trevino R, Shang L, McDermott SP, Landis MD, et al. Breast cancer stem cells transition between epithelial and mesenchymal states reflective of their normal counterparts. Stem Cell Rep. 2014;2(1):78–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Beerling E, Seinstra D, de Wit E, Kester L, van der Velden D, Maynard C, Schafer R, van Diest P, Voest E, van Oudenaarden A, et al. Plasticity between epithelial and mesenchymal States unlinks EMT from metastasis-enhancing stem cell capacity. Cell Rep. 2016;14(10):2281–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hatina J, Boesch M, Sopper S, Kripnerova M, Wolf D, Reimer D, Marth C, Zeimet AG. Ovarian Cancer stem cell heterogeneity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1139:201–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mitra T, Prasad P, Mukherjee P, Chaudhuri SR, Chatterji U, Roy SS. Stemness and chemoresistance are imparted to the OC cells through TGFbeta1 driven EMT. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(7):5775–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang S, Balch C, Chan MW, Lai HC, Matei D, Schilder JM, Yan PS, Huang TH, Nephew KP. Identification and characterization of ovarian cancer-initiating cells from primary human tumors. Cancer Res. 2008;68(11):4311–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li Y, Gong W, Ma X, Sun X, Jiang H, Chen T. Smad7 maintains epithelial phenotype of ovarian cancer stem-like cells and supports tumor colonization by mesenchymal-epithelial transition. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(1):309–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wei Y, Wu S, Xu W, Liang Y, Li Y, Zhao W, Wu J. Depleted aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) reverses cisplatin resistance of human lung adenocarcinoma cell A549/DDP. Thorac Cancer. 2017;8(1):26–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang W, He S, Zhang R, Peng J, Guo D, Zhang J, Xiang B, Li L. ALDH1A1 maintains the cancer stem-like cells properties of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by activating the AKT signal pathway and interacting with beta-catenin. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;125:109940.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172826) and the Educational Department of Liaoning Province (LJKZ0760).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathophysiology, College of Basic Medical Science, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110122, P.R. China

    Yuhong Xia, Shan Wang, Yu Sun, Wei Wang & Chenghai Zhao

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineer, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110122, P.R. China

    Shijie Chang

  3. Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110001, P.R. China

    Zhongbo Zhang

Authors
  1. Yuhong Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shijie Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhongbo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chenghai Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C. Zhao, Z. Zhang, and S. Chang conceived and designed the study. Y. Xia, S. Wang, Y. Sun, and W. Wang performed experiments. Y. Xia and C. Zhao analyzed data, interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. C. Zhao, Z. Zhang, and S. Chang reviewed and revised the manuscript. C. Zhao supervised the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shijie Chang, Zhongbo Zhang or Chenghai Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All studies involving mice were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of China Medical University (CMU2021249). The use of human specimens for research was approved by Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Tumor hospital of China Medical University (KY20230905).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, Y., Wang, S., Sun, Y. et al. Frizzled class receptor 5 contributes to ovarian cancer chemoresistance through aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1. Cell Commun Signal 22, 194 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-024-01585-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-024-01585-y

Keywords

Cell Communication and Signaling

ISSN: 1478-811X