Open Access

Stoichiometry and intracellular fate of TRIM-containing TCR complexes

  • Mahima Swamy1,
  • Gabrielle M Siegers1, 2,
  • Gina J Fiala1, 3,
  • Eszter Molnar1,
  • Elaine P Dopfer1,
  • Paul Fisch4,
  • Burkhart Schraven5 and
  • Wolfgang WA Schamel1Email author
Cell Communication and Signaling20108:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-8-5

Received: 31 December 2009

Accepted: 18 March 2010

Published: 18 March 2010

Abstract

Background

Studying the stoichiometry and intracellular trafficking of the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) is pivotal in understanding its mechanisms of activation. The αβTCR includes the antigen-binding TCRαβ heterodimer as well as the signal transducing CD3εγ, CD3εδ and ζ2 subunits. Although the TCR-interacting molecule (TRIM) is also part of the αβTCR complex, it has not been included in most reports so far.

Results

We used the native antibody-based mobility shift (NAMOS) assay in a first dimension (1D) blue native (BN)-PAGE and a 2D BN-/BN-PAGE to demonstrate that the stoichiometry of the digitonin-solublized TRIM-containing αβTCR is TCRαβCD3ε2γδζ2TRIM2. Smaller αβTCR complexes possess a TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2 stoichiometry. Complexes of these sizes were detected in T cell lines as well as in primary human and mouse T cells. Stimulating the αβTCR with anti-CD3 antibodies, we demonstrate by confocal laser scanning microscopy that CD3ε colocalizes with ζ and both are degraded upon prolonged stimulation, possibly within the lysosomal compartment. In contrast, a substantial fraction of TRIM does not colocalize with ζ. Furthermore, TRIM neither moves to lysosomes nor is degraded. Immunoprecipitation studies and BN-PAGE indicate that TRIM also associates with the γδTCR.

Conclusions

Small αβTCR complexes have a TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2 stoichiometry; whereas those associated with one TRIM dimer are TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2TRIM2. TRIM is differentially processed compared to CD3 and ζ subunits after T cell activation and is not degraded. The γδTCR also associates with TRIM.

Background

T cells are classified as αβ or γδ T cells depending on the type of T cell receptor (TCR) that they express. The γδTCR is expressed on γδ T cells and is involved in their development and activation. γδTCR ligands are largely undefined, but include protein and non-protein substances [1, 2]. The αβTCR controls the development and activation of αβ T cells, and thus plays a critical role in the adaptive immune system. Its ligands are non-self peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules (MHC) on the surface of antigen presenting cells (APC).

The αβTCR consists of TCRαβ, CD3γε, CD3δε and ζζ (CD2472) dimers that are non-covalently bound to one another [3, 4]. The heterodimeric TCRαβ contains variable immunoglobulin (Ig) domains, which bind to peptide/MHC-complexes. Furthermore, it possesses a transmembrane (TM) region that mediates its association with the CD3 subunits via potentially positively charged amino acids [57]. Each CD3 subunit contains an invariable extracellular part, a TM region carrying potentially negatively charged amino acids and a cytoplasmic tail with several signal transduction motifs, including an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) [8]. The ζ chain contains only 9 extracellular amino acids buried within the αβTCR complex [9, 10], a TM region with a potentially negatively charged amino acid that also binds to TCRαβ, and a cytoplasmic tail with three ITAMs. Upon ligand binding to TCRαβ, the CD3 subunits undergo a conformational change [1114] and the ITAMs within the CD3 cytoplasmic tails and ζ-chains become phosphorylated by protein tyrosine kinases of the Src-family. They subsequently recruit SH2-domain containing intracellular signaling and adapter molecules to the plasma membrane. Hence, while the TCRαβ heterodimer is responsible for binding of the antigen, the CD3 and ζ subunits of the αβTCR serve as signal transducing elements. The γδTCR is composed of the same signal transducing elements while carrying the antigen binding TCRγδ heterodimer.

In addition to the above molecules, the TCR complex also includes the transmembrane adapter protein TRIM (TCR-Interacting Molecule) [1517]. The association of TRIM with the αβTCR is suggested by the following observations: (i) TRIM co-purifies either with the endogenous αβTCR [16, 18] or individually expressed ζ [18] under mild detergent conditions, (ii) TRIM co-caps with CD3ε upon antibody-mediated TCR-crosslinking in αβ T cells [18] and (iii) overexpression of TRIM leads to enhanced αβTCR expression at the cell surface [18]. However, in contrast to CD3 and ζ, TRIM is not mandatory for αβTCR assembly and surface expression [1922].

TRIM is structurally similar to the ζ chain; it has a short extracellular domain, a long cytoplasmic tail and is a disulfide-linked homodimer. However, its cytoplasmic tyrosine residues are not contained within typical ITAM sequences, but rather within YxxM-motifs that might mediate binding of the p85 subunit of PI3K [16]. TRIM is phosphorylated upon TCR-stimulation by Src protein tyrosine kinases [16] and, together with other transmembrane adapter proteins (e.g. SIT), modulates TCR-mediated signals thereby regulating thymocyte development [22, 23]. The precise signaling function of TRIM remains elusive, since the TRIM knock-out mouse did not show any phenotype in the assays employed [22].

Using the native antibody-based mobility shift (NAMOS) assay, we recently revealed the stoichiometry of the basic αβTCR complex extracted from T cell membranes which is TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2 [2427]. The stoichiometry of the γδTCR is TCRγδ CD3ε2γδζ2 (human) and TCRγδ CD3ε2γ2ζ2 (mouse) [28]. However, in these studies we did not look for TRIM-containing TCR complexes. Therefore, the present study was aimed at deciphering the stoichiometry of TRIM-containing TCRs. Furthermore, we analyzed the intracellular fate of TRIM upon TCR-stimulation in comparison with that of other components of the TCR complex.

Results

The αβTCR forms two complexes, one of which contains TRIM

The TCR complex of the TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2 stoichiometry resolves in BN-PAGE just below the f1 marker [2427]. We noticed that digitonin-purified human TCRs often showed a second larger complex in BN-PAGE [25]. To characterize this complex biochemically, using digitonin we purified the αβTCR from the 31.13scTCRβ T cell line [25], which expresses a single chain-tagged TCRβ subunit (scTCRβ) [11]. The sc-tag binds nitrophenol (NP) with moderate and nitroiodophenol (NIP) with high affinity [29]. By binding to NP-coupled columns and subsequently eluting the bound complexes with free NIP, we purified the scTCR in its native form. After separation by BN-PAGE, the eluted αβTCR complexes were detected with an anti-ζ antiserum. Figure 1A, lane 1 shows that under these experimental conditions two distinct αβTCRs were detected. Note that the αβTCR from Jurkat cells showed the same two bands, although smaller in size due to the absence of the sc-tag (lanes 2 and 3). The larger complex was stimulation-independent, since it was present in pervanadate-stimulated (lane 2) as well as in unstimulated (lane 3) Jurkat cells. The increase in molecular weight for the larger complexes indicated an additional mass of 50 to 100 kDa (not shown).
Figure 1

The large αβTCR complex contains TRIM. (A) The single chain-tagged TCR (scTCR) was purified from digitonin-lysed 31.13scTCRβ cells using NP-sepharose affinity columns and free NIP for elution (lane 1). Pervanadate-stimulated Jurkat cells were lysed in digitonin and αβTCRs purified with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies followed by phenylphosphate elution (lane 2). Membranes from Jurkat cells were lysed in digitonin (lane 3). TCRs were separated by BN-PAGE and immunoblotted against ζ. The marker protein was ferritin in its 24- and 48-meric forms (f1: 440 kDa, f2: 880 kDa). (B) 31.13scTCRβ (lanes 1 and 3) and Jurkat (lane 2) cell lysates were subjected to affinity purification on NP-sepharose columns. The purified proteins were separated on a reducing SDS-PAGE; TRIM and ζ were detected by immunoblotting. (C) NP-purified scTCRs were separated by 1D BN-PAGE and 2D non-reducing SDS-PAGE. Immunoblotting was done against scTCRβ, TRIM and ζ.

TRIM forms disulfide-linked dimers of 60 kDa and noncovalently associates with the TCR [16, 18]. To test whether TRIM is associated with the scαβTCR, we lysed 31.13scTCRβ or Jurkat cells in digitonin and affinity-purified αβTCR complexes with NP-sepharose. The purified material was separated on a reducing SDS-PAGE. TRIM and ζ were detected by Western blotting. The untagged αβTCR from Jurkat cells did not bind to NP-sepharose and thus TRIM was not detected (lane 2); however, both TRIM and ζ were purified from scTCR lysates, (Figure 1B, lane 3), indicating that TRIM associated to the scTCR. This is in line with the binding of TRIM to αβTCRs [16, 18].

Next we tested whether TRIM was part of the larger αβTCR complex seen in BN-PAGE. To this end, the two scTCR complexes in the BN-PAGE were further separated by a second dimension non-reducing SDS-PAGE and analysed by anti-TCRβ and anti-ζ Western blotting. This approach revealed that both small and large αβTCR-complexes contained TCRβ and ζ (Figure 1C, upper and lower panel). The signal detected by anti-TCRβ was at 90 kDa and that detected by anti-ζ was at 35 kDa, corresponding to the TCRαβ and ζζ dimers, respectively. Immunoblotting against TRIM revealed that TRIM dimers of 50-60 kDa were solely present in the larger αβTCR complex. Thus, two αβTCR complexes exist in digitonin lysates, one with TRIM and one without.

Stoichiometry of TRIM-containing αβTCR complexes

The NAMOS assay can be used to assess stoichiometries of multiprotein complexes [25, 26]. When the NAMOS assay was performed using anti-TRIM antibodies, we found that part of the αβTCR shifted once at low antibody concentrations (Figure 2A, band a), indicating one antibody bound to the αβTCR. With high amounts of anti-TRIM antibody, a second shift was generated (band b) that likely contains two anti-TRIM antibodies. Therefore, two anti-TRIM binding sites and thus two copies of the TRIM protein are present, indicating that one TRIM homodimer [16] is a component of the large αβTCR complex.
Figure 2

The stoichiometry of the TRIM-containing αβTCR. (A) Digitonin-solubilized scTCRs from 31.13scTCRβ cells were purified from NP-sepharose affinity columns using free NIP for elution. Before loading on a native gel, the TCR was incubated with the indicated amounts of the anti-TRIM antibody TRIM-7, and after separation, immunoblotted with anti-ζ. αβTCR complexes bound to one or two antibodies are marked with a or b, respectively. Ferritin was used as a marker protein as in figure 1. (B) αβTCRs were purified as in (A) and after separation by a 1D BN-PAGE, each lane was subjected to a 2D BN-PAGE into which the indicated amounts of the anti-CD3ε antibody UCHT1 had been loaded. The anti-ζ antiserum was used for Western blot detection. Arrows: small, the TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2 TCR; and large, the TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2TRIM2 TCR. (C) a schematic of the TRIM-containing large αβTCR complex is shown.

Next, we modified the NAMOS-assay, using it in a second dimension (2D) BN-PAGE to also assess the amount of CD3ε within the complex. The presence of two αβTCR complexes precludes the use of the NAMOS-assay in a 1D BN-PAGE, since both large and small αβTCR complexes would shift, resulting in several bands, which would be difficult to assign. We separated the two αβTCRs by BN-PAGE, and subsequently let antibody bind during a further separation by 2D BN-PAGE. We tested various experimental conditions to bring the antibody into contact with the complexes inside the first dimension BN-PAGE (not shown). The protocol that worked best was to load varying amounts of antibody onto the 2D gel and allow it to enter the stacking gel by brief electrophoresis. Subsequently, the 1D gel slices containing the αβTCR complexes were placed over the 2D stacking gel and electrophoresis was continued. When we applied this 2D BN-/BN-PAGE NAMOS-assay to the αβTCRs using an anti-CD3ε antibody, we detected two shifts for both complexes (Figure 2B), indicating that both contained two CD3ε subunits. A third shift evident at 0.4 μg/μl anti-CD3ε is attributed to two αβTCR complexes crosslinked by one antibody, a phenomenon occurring at non-saturating antibody concentrations (Figure 2B, 3rd panel). The large αβTCR complex thus contains TCRαβ (Figure 1C), ζ2 (Figures 1 and 2), one TRIM homodimer (Figure 2A) and two CD3ε (Figure 2B). Since CD3ε always pairs with CD3γ and CD3δ [3] it can be concluded that the TRIM-containing αβTCR has a stoichiometry of TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2TRIM2 (Figure 2C).

TRIM is loosely associated with the αβTCR

We have observed the larger TRIM-containing αβTCR in BN-PAGE over many years. One example is shown in figure 3, where we have used the scTCR (Figure 3A). Depending on the experiment, the proportion of TRIM-containing αβTCRs can vary from 50% of all αβTCRs (lane 1) to undetectable amounts (lane 4). The reasons for this inconsistency might include: different lots of the detergent digitonin used for αβTCR extraction and washing, different detergent/lipid ratios and slightly different purification and separation conditions. The large TRIM-αβTCR band has a defined size, indicating that it contains a specific protein complex and is not an artefact caused by protein aggregation. The observation that TRIM is easily lost from the αβTCR complex shows that TRIM is loosely associated and that a large percentage of αβTCRs might contain TRIM in the living cell.
Figure 3

Primary cells express the TRIM-containing αβTCR. (A) 31.13scTCRβ cells were lysed with digitonin on different days using different lots of digitonin. scTCRs were purified from NP-sepharose affinity columns using free NIP for elution. TCRs were separated by BN-PAGE and immunoblotted against ζ. (B) TCRs were purified from pervanadate-stimulated Jurkat cells as in figure 1A (lane 1). Membranes were prepared from human PBMC and lysed in digitonin (lane 2). Murine thymocytes were stimulated with pervanadate and and TCRs purified with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies followed by phenylphosphate elution (lane 3). TCRs were separated by BN-PAGE and immunoblotted against ζ. Ferritin was used as a marker protein as in figure 1.

The TRIM-containing αβTCR is present in primary T cells

To extend our studies to primary cells from human and mouse, we used human peripheral blood T lymphocytes as well as murine thymocytes (Figure 3B, lanes 2 and 3). Jurkat cells served as a control (lane 1). Digitonin-solubilized αβTCR complexes were separated by BN-PAGE. The larger αβTCR complex, that most likely includes TRIM, was present in primary cells. This is in line with our earlier data showing that TRIM co-caps with CD3 in primary human cells [18] and that TRIM is expressed in murine thymocytes [30].

TRIM is also a component of the γδTCR complex

We are also interested in the γδTCR complex. We have shown that the most abundant human γδTCR after digitonin extraction has a stoichiometry of TCRγδ CD3ε2γδζ2 [28]. To test whether a second larger complex of the γδTCR is detected in BN-PAGE, we analyzed digitonin-purified γδTCRs from the human γδ T cell line Peer or from a human γδ T cell clone. Peer cells express a γδTCR containing the TCRγ2 protein and the clone a Vγ9Vδ2 receptor (data not shown) including the TCRγ1 protein. Separated γδTCRs were detected by Western blotting using anti-ζ antibodies (Figure 4A). Under these experimental conditions two distinct γδTCRs were detected. The size difference is likely due to the incorporation of one TRIM dimer in the larger complex. To confirm that TRIM binds the γδTCR, we immunopurified the γδTCR from lysates of Peer γδ T cells using anti-TCR specific antibodies. Complexes were separated by non-reducing SDS-PAGE; TRIM and ζ were detected by Western blotting (Figure 4B). In control samples, TRIM was absent in anti-TCRβ precipitates prepared from Peer cells (lane 3) and anti-TCRγδ precipitates from Jurkat cells (lane 9). However, TRIM was found in anti-CD3ε, anti-TCRγδ and anti-ζ immuno-isolates of Peer cells (lanes 1, 2 and 5) as well as anti-CD3ε, anti-TCRαβ and anti-ζ immuno-isolates of Jurkat T cells (lanes 7, 8 and 11). Thus, TRIM also associates with the γδTCR, independent of which TCRγ chain is used.
Figure 4

TRIM is part of the γδTCR complex. (A) The human γδ T cell line Peer (left) and a human Vγ9Vδ2 clone (right) were pervanadate-stimulated and lysed in digitonin. γδTCRs were purified with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies followed by phenylphosphate elution. TCRs were separated by BN-PAGE and immunoblotted against ζ. Ferritin was used as a marker protein as in figure 1. (B) Peer γδ and Jurkat αβ T cells were lysed and immunoprecipitations performed with antibodies recognizing the indicated proteins (lanes 1 - 5 and 7 - 11). Purified proteins, as well as lysates (lanes 6 and 12), were separated by non-reducing SDS-PAGE. TRIM and ζ were detected by immunoblotting.

Intracellular fate of TRIM after αβTCR stimulation

Upon binding of peptide/MHC-complexes the αβTCR is endocytosed and degraded in lysosomes [31]. To assess whether TRIM is also internalized and degraded upon T-cell activation, we stimulated human peripheral blood T lymphocytes with anti-CD3ε mAb and subsequently investigated the subcellular localization of TRIM by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy. As previously reported, TRIM showed strong capping at the T cell surface after one hour of αβTCR stimulation (Figure 5A, upper panel). Similarly, αβTCR stimulation induced capping of the ζ chain (lower panel).
Figure 5

Colocalization of TRIM with CD3ε and ζ 1 hour post-αβTCR activation. (A) Human peripheral blood T cells were incubated with the IgM anti-CD3ε mAb 2Ad2a2 for 1 hour or left unstimulated. Cells were fixed and the subcellular localization of TRIM and ζ was determined using the antibodies TRIM-7 mAb (top) and anti-ζ mAb 6B10.2 (bottom). Secondary staining was done with a Texas red-labeled donkey anti-mouse antiserum. (B) Cells were stimulated as in (A), then fixed and the subcellular localization of ζ detected using FITC-labelled anti-ζ mAb 6B10.2. CD3ε was visualized using Texas Red-labelled goat anti-mouse IgM (left) and a biotinylated TRIM-4 mAb followed by Texas Red-coupled streptavidin were used to detect TRIM (right).

To further assess the relationship between CD3ε, ζ and TRIM after αβTCR stimulation, we studied the colocalization of ζ/CD3ε and ζ/TRIM in capped cells by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy. Confirming the tight interaction between the two molecules within the αβTCR complex, ζ and CD3ε showed an almost 100% co-localization after 1 hour of T cell activation (Figure 5B, left panel). In marked contrast, under the same experimental conditions, we only observed a partial colocalization between TRIM and ζ (right panel). This finding suggested that the intracellular fate and processing of TRIM differs from that of the other αβTCR components. This assumption was further substantiated by the finding that TRIM did not colocalize with the lysosomal marker Lamp1 at early or late time points of T cell activation (Figure 6A). Furthermore, while the fluorescence signals for both CD3ε and ζ were almost completely lost after prolonged stimulation (due to lysosomal degradation), significant amounts of TRIM were still detectable even after 18 hours of T cell activation (Figure 6B). Thus, despite its association with the αβTCR complex, upon T cell activation the intracellular processing of TRIM differs from that of the other αβTCR components.
Figure 6

Differential processing of TRIM compared to other αβTCR complex components. (A) Human peripheral blood T cells were incubated with anti-CD3ε mAb 2Ad2a2 to induce cap formation for 1 and 23 hours or left unstimulated. Cells were fixed and the subcellular localization of TRIM detected using biotinylated TRIM-4 mAb and Texas Red-coupled streptavidin; LAMP1 was stained with FITC-labelled anti-Lamp 1 antibody. (B) Cells were unstimulated (top) or stimulated as above for 18 hours. In all panels, actin was visualized using a Cy2-labelled goat anti-rabbit antiserum. Primary mAb antibodies were: OKT3 for CD3ε; 6B10.2 for ζ; TRIM-7 for TRIM; and W6/32 for HLA-1. Texas Red-labelled donkey anti-mouse was used as the secondary antibody.

Discussion

The stoichiometry of the TCR complex has been extensively studied [4]. However, the TRIM protein, known to associate with the TCR, was not included in these studies. Using the NAMOS assay [26], we show that in digitonin two αβTCR complexes exist with the stoichiometries TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2 and TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2TRIM2. Thus, two TRIM molecules associate with some αβTCR complexes. This is in line with the dimeric nature of TRIM [16].

In digitonin detergent lysates, most αβTCRs did not include TRIM. On one hand, this could indicate that most αβTCRs lack TRIM on the cell surface. This is possible, since TRIM is not required for surface expression of the αβTCR [1922], but still might be included when present. On the other hand, TRIM might be part of all αβTCR complexes in T cells, but partially dissociates under our detergent conditions. The TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2 stoichiometry is held together by potentially charged amino acids in the transmembrane regions of its subunits [7]. TRIM does not have such amino acids in its transmembrane region [16] and thus might associate less stably with the rest of the αβTCR. Indeed, our data suggest that TRIM is loosely associated with the αβTCR and might be partially (or completely) lost upon purification of the complex.

We have previously shown (and confirmed here) that TRIM co-caps and co-modulates with the αβTCR. Our early studies demonstrated that the reduction of TRIM expression in TCR-modulated T cells was less severe than the reduction of CD3ε and ζ expression. Here, we have extended these observations by showing that the intracellular fate of TRIM differs from that of the other αβTCR components. Indeed, upon prolonged mAb-mediated stimulation of αβ T cells, CD3ε and ζ were no longer detectable by microscopy, most likely due to their degradation within the lysosomal compartment [3134]. Moreover, confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed an almost complete colocalization of CD3ε and ζ in capped T cells. In marked contrast, a substantial fraction of TRIM did not colocalize with ζ in these cells. Even after 18 hours of stimulation, a substantial fraction of intracellular TRIM was still detectable within T cells and thus was not degraded. These findings were further corroborated by the observation that upon T cell activation TRIM is not targeted to lysosomes (as evidenced by lack of colocalization with the lysosomal marker Lamp1).

The CD3, ζ and TRIM molecules contain the YxxL/I internalization signal [35] that might target proteins for lysosomal degradation [31]. However, not all YxxL/I containing proteins are degraded. In case of the αβTCR it was shown that the Casitas B-lineage lymphoma proteins c-Cbl and Cbl-b (RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligases) together with Cbl adaptor proteins Src-like adaptor protein SLAP and ζ-associated protein ZAP70, target internalized ζ chains to degradation by lysosomes [3639]. Thus, they are involved in αβTCR downmodulation by inhibiting recycling of internalized αβTCRs. LAPTM5, a lysosomal protein, is also involved in this degradation pathway, since it binds to ubiquitinylated ζ, but not to CD3ε, CD3γ or CD3δ [34]. Our observation that TRIM does not co-localize with ζ and is not degraded might be because TRIM is not bound by SLAP, Cbl, ZAP70 or LAPTM5. Indeed. TRIM does not contain any ITAM to which ZAP70 binds.

The double leucine (LL) internalization motif in CD3γ and CD3δ, but not in ζ, CD3ε or TRIM, does not target for degradation [32, 40]. Thus, these signals cannot be the reason for differential targeting of TRIM compared to CD3 and ζ. However, the transmembrane regions, containing sorting motifs in the case of CD3ε and ζ [41, 42], are not conserved between CD3/ζ and TRIM. This region of CD3 and ζ is negatively charged, but neutral in TRIM. Thus, this might be the reason for their differential fates after internalization. In conclusion, while TRIM is a component of large αβTCR complexes on the T cell surface, it is differentially processed after T cell activation.

TRIM binds to the ζ subunit of the αβTCR [18]. Since the γδTCR also contains ζ, we tested whether TRIM might associate with the γδTCR and thereby give rise to a second larger detectable γδTCR. This was indeed the case as shown by co-immunopurifications and BN-PAGE analysis. The small human γδTCR complex has a stoichiometry of TCRγδ CD3ε2γδζ2 [2, 28]; the larger complex likely has a TCRγδ CD3ε2γδζ2TRIM2 stoichiometry. At the double negative stage of T cell development, TRIM is already expressed together with the pre-TCR [30], which also includes ζ. Therefore, it is likely that TRIM also associates with the pre-TCR complex. It remains to be seen whether TRIM processing in the context of pre-TCR and γδTCR activation is similar to that observed with the αβTCR complex.

Finally, we present an extension of the NAMOS-assay to 2D BN-/BN-PAGE. The multiprotein complexes of interest are first separated by standard BN-PAGE. Then an antibody to a certain subunit (X) is added and a 2D BN-PAGE is applied. Thus, each individual complex is separately shifted due to the binding of the antibody to X in the second dimension. From the spot patterns of the 2D gel, the number of X molecules per complex can be deduced separately for each complex. Using this method, we show that two CD3ε molecules are present in both the small and the large αβTCR complex. We tested several protocols and determined how to best add the antibody of interest to the TCR complex present within the 1D BN-PAGE (see Methods). A NAMOS-assay 2D BN-/BN-PAGE extends the applicability of the assay to include multiprotein complexes in which a protein exists in more than one complex.

Conclusions

Here we describe four main results: 1. A novel method to study stoichiometries in 2D BN-/BN-PAGE, in order to define stoichiometries of multiprotein complexes even if they are present in a mixture; 2. The αβTCR complex is found in two forms: TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2TRIM2 and TCRαβ CD3ε2γδζ2, not including TRIM; 3. After stimulation, the αβTCR complex is internalized. CD3 subunits are then degraded in lysosomes, however, TRIM is not subject to this trafficking route and remains intact; 4. TRIM is also associated with the γδTCR.

Methods

Cells

Jurkat, Peer and 31.13scTCRβ T cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (GIBCO BRL) medium supplemented with 5% FCS, as previously described [25]. Peripheral blood T lymphocytes were prepared by E-rosetting from freshly drawn venous blood of healthy donors as described elsewhere [43]. Mouse thymocytes were prepared as described [44]. The human γδ T cell clone was generated from blood as before [28] and was named PF55. PF55 expresses a Vγ9Vδ2 TCR (data not shown).

Antibodies

The following monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies (Abs) were used for immunoprecipitation, confocal laser scan microscopy, Western blotting, and indirect immunofluorescence as indicated: HLA-I (W6/32, for flow cytometry analysis and cap formation); anti-ζ monoclonal antibody (mAb), clone 6B10.2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., for confocal laser scan analysis and immunoprecipitation); CD3ε mAb OKT3 (for co-capping and flow cytometry analysis); CD3ε clone 2Ad2a2 (IgM; donated by Dr. E. Reinherz, Dana Farber Cancer Center, Boston, MA, for modulation experiments). The rabbit anti-ζ antiserum 448 has been described previously [45]. The anti-TRIM mouse mAb TRIM-7 has also been previously described [18]. Affinity-purified polyclonal anti-TRIM antiserum was prepared as described elsewhere [16, 18] and used at 5-10 μg/ml for confocal laser scan analysis.

Cell lysates and protein purification

To purify the TCR for subsequent BN-PAGE or NAMOS assays, 107 Jurkat or Peer T cells were incubated in 200 μM pervanadate (8.8 μl 23 mM sodium orthovanadate plus 1.2 μl 30% H2O2) at 37°C for 5 min in 1 ml RPMI medium to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of the TCR. Cells were lysed in 1 ml lysis buffer (20 mM TrisHCl pH 8, 137 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM PMSF, 500 μM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF and 1% digitonin). Phosphorylated proteins were purified by incubation with 1 μg of the anti-phosphotyrosine Ab 4G10 (Upstate Biotechnology) and 3 μl protein G-Sepharose (Pharmacia) for minimum 6 hours. The beads were washed twice in lysis buffer, once in BN buffer (0.5 M 6-aminohexanoic acid, 12.5 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% digitonin, 20 mM BisTris pH7.0, 1 mM PMSF) and eluted in 100 μl BN elution buffer (BN buffer including 50 mM phenylphosphate and 1 unit alkaline phosphatase to dephosphorylate the receptor) for a minimum of 30 min on ice. The scTCR was purified from cell lysates using NP (3-nitro-4-hydroxy-phenylacetate)-conjugated Sepharose, washed three times with BN buffer, and the scTCR eluted in BN-buffer containing 0.5 mM free NIP (NIP-caproic acid, Biosearch Technologies). The eluate was then directly loaded onto a BN gel, or first incubated with Abs against specific subunits, as detailed below.

Membranes were prepared as described [12]

For immunoprecipitation of αβ or γδTCRs in figure 4, Jurkat or Peer cells were lysed in 1 ml lysis buffer (as above, but containing 0.5% Brij-96 instead of digitonin) and purified by incubation with antibodies against CD3ε (UCHT1, kind gift of Dr. P Beverley, The Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research, Compton, UK), γδTCR (5A6. E9, Pierce Chemical Co.), TCRβ (BV8, Pharmingen), TRIM or ζ(448, described above) coupled to protein G-Sepharose for 4 hours. Beads were washed 4 times with lysis buffer, resuspended in non-reducing sample buffer, boiled 5 min and loaded onto SDS-PAGE.

BN-PAGE, SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting

BN-PAGE gradient gels (4%-9%) were prepared using a gradient mixer and the Protean II system from BioRad; the stacking gel was 3.2% polyacrylamide. Gel composition, pouring procedure and running conditions have been described [4649]. In short, the loaded gels were run at 4°C at 20 V overnight. For running BN-PAGE, sample buffer was omitted, but samples in BN elution buffer were carefully overlaid with blue cathode buffer instead (15 mM BisTris pH7.0, 50 mM Tricine and 0.02% Coomassie blue G250). The marker protein was ferritin in its 24-, 48- and 72 meric forms (f1: 440 kDa, f2: 880 kDa, f3: 1320 kDa, respectively). Western blotting was done using PVDF membranes and a semi-dry transfer system, at 18 V for 15 to 20 minutes, with transfer buffer containing 0.1% SDS. SDS-PAGE was performed using standard protocols. The membranes were developed using the Abs mentioned above and secondary Abs were anti-rabbit IgG coupled to HRPO or goat anti-mouse IgG HRPO from Southern Biotechnology. Visualization was performed using the ECL system.

The NAMOS assay was done as described [26, 27]. In brief, the indicated amounts of Abs were added to the samples (10 to 20 μl), mixed and incubated for 5-30 min on ice before loading them on BN-PAGE. MPC-antibody conjugates migrate slower in native gels, such that the shift directly reflects the number of Ab molecules bound to the complex.

NAMOS (Native antibody-based mobility shift) assay in the second dimension

Protein complexes are initially separated by a first dimension (1D) BN-PAGE. They are then brought into contact with anti-subunit Abs while inside the gel. Finally, the protein complex-antibody supercomplexes are separated by a second dimension (2D) BN-PAGE. We tested several experimental procedures for the formation of supercomplexes. The most successful procedure was to load given amounts of Ab in a small volume (e.g. 10 - 20 μl) into the large pocket of the 2D stacking gel. Using the BioRad minigel equipment, electrophoresis is carried out for a few minutes at 100 V, in order to let the Ab enter 1 - 2 mm into the stacking gel. Then the gel run is stopped and the 1D gel lane placed into the large pocket, after which the gel run is continued. During the stacking process, the Ab comes into contact with the protein complexes and forms supercomplexes that are then separated by the 2D separating gel.

Co-capping Experiments

Resting peripheral blood T cells were washed twice with RPMI (without FCS) and adjusted to 7× 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640. 10 μl of this suspension was pipetted onto each reaction field of an adhesion slide (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and allowed to adhere for 10 min at room temperature. Adherent cells were washed twice with RPMI and the slide was blocked for 15 min with complete culture medium. Cap formation was subsequently induced by incubating the cells for 15 min with 15 μl mAb solution (10 μg/ml in complete culture medium), followed by two washes with RPMI 1640 (50 μl per field) and cross-linking of the primary Abs with 15 μl Texas red-labeled donkey anti-mouse antiserum (Dianova; diluted 1:50 vol/vol in culture medium) for 35 min at room temperature in the dark. Capped cells were washed twice with 50 μl PBS supplemented with 0.2% NaN3 and then fixed for 3 min with cold methanol (stored at -20°C). The methanol was removed and the cells were fixed for an additional 5 s with ice-cold acetone. Fixed cells were washed twice with PBS and blocked again for 10 min with PBS/1% BSA at room temperature. Subsequently, affinity-purified polyclonal Abs directed at TRIM and CD3ε were added (15 μl per field, concentration 10 μg/ml) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The Ab-labeled cells were then washed once with PBS/BSA (40 μl per field) and three times with PBS. 15 μl secondary Cy2-labeled donkey anti-rabbit Ab (Dianova) were then added (1:125 vol/vol in PBS/1% BSA) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Cells were washed once with PBS/BSA, three times with PBS, and finally at least 5 min with distilled water. The slides were then covered with a cover slip, which was fixed with Elvanol (Calbiochem) for at least 16 h.

Slides were viewed on a Laser scan microscope (Ernst Leitz GmbH) using 570 nm (red emission) and 508 nm (green emission) filters, respectively. In general, the magnification was 40×.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Balbino Alarcon, Vaclav Horjesi and Michael Reth for scientific support. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the Emmy Noether program (to W.S.), the SFB620 (to W.S. and P.F.) and FOR521 (to B.S.) and the EU grant FP7/2007-2013 (SYBILLA, to W.S. and B.S.). This study was supported in part by the Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments (GSC-4, Spemann Graduate School).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Immunology, Max Planck-Institute of Immunobiology and Institute for Biology III, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg
(2)
Cell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Hospital/Ontario Cancer Institute
(3)
Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg
(4)
Department of Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center
(5)
Institute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

References

  1. Hayday AC: γδ cells: a right time and a right place for a conserved third way of protection. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000, 18: 975-1026. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.975.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Siegers GM, Fernandez-Malave E, Fisch P, Regueiro JR, Schamel WW: From structure to disease: differential CD3 usage in the human and mouse gd T cell antigen receptor determines the impact of CD3 deficiencies on T cell development. Int J Med Biol Frontiers. 2008, 14: 115-132.Google Scholar
  3. Alarcon B, Gil D, Delgado P, Schamel WWA: Initiation of TCR signaling: regulation within CD3 dimers. Immunol Rev. 2003, 191: 38-46. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2003.00017.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alarcon B, Swamy M, van Santen HM, Schamel WW: T-cell antigen-receptor stoichiometry: pre-clustering for sensitivity. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7: 490-495. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400682.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumberg RS, Alarcon B, Sancho J, McDermott FV, Lopez P, Breitmeyer J, Terhorst C: Assembly and function of the T cell antigen receptor. Requirement of either the lysine or arginine residues in the transmembrane region of the alpha chain. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 14036-14043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cosson P, Lankford SP, Bonifacino JS, Klausner RD: Membrane protein association by potential intramembrane charge pairs. Nature. 1991, 351: 414-416. 10.1038/351414a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Call ME, Pyrdol J, Wiedmann M, Wucherpfennig KW: The organizing principle in the formation of the T cell receptor-CD3 complex. Cell. 2002, 111: 967-979. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01194-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Reth M: Antigen receptor tail clue. Nature. 1989, 338: 383-10.1038/338383b0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Minguet S, Swamy M, Dopfer EP, Dengler E, Alarcon B, Schamel WWA: The extracellular part of zeta is buried in the T cell antigen receptor complex. Immunol Lett. 2008, 116: 203-210. 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.11.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Minguet S, Swamy M, Schamel WWA: The short length of the extracellular domain of zeta is crucial for T cell antigen receptor function. Immunol Lett. 2008, 116: 195-202. 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.11.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gil D, Schamel WW, Montoya M, Sanchez-Madrid F, Alarcon B: Recruitment of Nck by CD3 epsilon reveals a ligand-induced conformational change essential for T cell receptor signaling and synapse formation. Cell. 2002, 109: 901-912. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00799-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Minguet S, Swamy M, Alarcon B, Luescher IF, Schamel WW: Full activation of the T cell receptor requires both clustering and conformational changes at CD3. Immunity. 2007, 26: 43-54. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Risueno RM, Schamel WW, Alarcon B: T cell receptor engagement triggers its CD3epsilon and CD3zeta subunits to adopt a compact, locked conformation. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e1747-10.1371/journal.pone.0001747.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Minguet S, Schamel WWA: A permissive geometry model for TCR-CD3 activation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2008, 33: 51-57. 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schraven B, Ratnofsky S, Gaumont Y, Lindegger H, Kirchgessner H, Bruyns E, Moebius U, Meuer SC: Identification of a novel dimeric phosphoprotein (PP29/30) associated with signaling receptors in human T lymphocytes and natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 1994, 180: 897-906. 10.1084/jem.180.3.897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruyns E, Marie-Cardine A, Kirchgessner H, Sagolla K, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Autschbach F, Bensussan A, Meuer S, Schraven B: T cell receptor (TCR) interacting molecule (TRIM), a novel disulfide-linked dimer associated with the TCR-CD3-zeta complex, recruits intracellular signaling proteins to the plasma membrane. J Exp Med. 1998, 188: 561-575. 10.1084/jem.188.3.561.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Horejsi V, Zhang W, Schraven B: Transmembrane adaptor proteins: organizers of immunoreceptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004, 4: 603-616. 10.1038/nri1414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirchgessner H, Dietrich J, Scherer J, Isomaki P, Korinek V, Hilgert I, Bruyns E, Leo A, Cope AP, Schraven B: The transmembrane adaptor protein TRIM regulates T cell receptor (TCR) expression and TCR-mediated signaling via an association with the TCR zeta chain. J Exp Med. 2001, 193: 1269-1284. 10.1084/jem.193.11.1269.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Berkhout B, Alarcon B, Terhorst C: Transfection of genes encoding the T cell receptor-associated CD3 complex into COS cells results in assembly of the macromolecular structure. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263: 8528-8536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall C, Berkhout B, Alarcon B, Sancho J, Wileman T, Terhorst C: Requirements for cell surface expression of the human TCR/CD3 complex in non-T cells. Int Immunol. 1991, 3: 359-368. 10.1093/intimm/3.4.359.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Carson GR, Kuestner RE, Ahmed A, Pettey CL, Concino MF: Six chains of the human T cell antigen receptor. CD3 complex are necessary and sufficient for processing the receptor heterodimer to the cell surface. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266: 7883-7887.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Koelsch U, Arndt B, Reinhold D, Lindquist JA, Juling N, Kliche S, Pfeffer K, Bruyns E, Schraven B, Simeoni L: Normal T-cell development and immune functions in TRIM-deficient mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 26: 3639-3648. 10.1128/MCB.26.9.3639-3648.2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Koelsch U, Schraven B, Simeoni L: SIT and TRIM determine T cell fate in the thymus. J Immunol. 2008, 181: 5930-5939.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zapata DA, Schamel WW, Torres PS, Alarcon B, Rossi NE, Navarro MN, Toribio ML, Regueiro J: Biochemical differences in the alphabeta T cell receptor. CD3 surface complex between CD8+ and CD4+ human mature T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 24485-24492. 10.1074/jbc.M311455200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schamel WW, Arechaga I, Risueno RM, van Santen HM, Cabezas P, Risco C, Valpuesta JM, Alarcon B: Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J Exp Med. 2005, 202: 493-503. 10.1084/jem.20042155.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Swamy M, Minguet S, Siegers GM, Alarcon B, Schamel WW: A native antibody-based mobility-shift technique (NAMOS-assay) to determine the stoichiometry of multiprotein complexes. J Immunol Methods. 2007, 324: 74-83. 10.1016/j.jim.2007.05.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Swamy M, Dopfer EP, Molnar E, Alarcon B, Schamel WW: The 450 kDa TCR Complex has a Stoichiometry of alphabetagammaepsilondeltaepsilonzetazeta. Scand J Immunol. 2008, 67: 418-420. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2008.02082.x. author reply 421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Siegers GM, Swamy M, Fernandez-Malave E, Minguet S, Rathmann S, Guardo AC, Perez-Flores V, Regueiro JR, Alarcon B, Fisch P, Schamel WW: Different composition of the human and the mouse gammadelta T cell receptor explains different phenotypes of CD3gamma- and CD3delta-immunodeficiencies. J Exp Med. 2007, 204: 2537-2544. 10.1084/jem.20070782.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Reth M, Imanishi-Kari T, Rajewsky K: Analysis of the repertoire of anti-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP) antibodies in C 57 BL/6 mice by cell fusion. II. Characterization of idiotopes by monoclonal anti-idiotope antibodies. Eur J Immunol. 1979, 12: 1004-1013. 10.1002/eji.1830091216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Huynh T, Wurch A, Bruyns E, Korinek V, Schraven B, Eichmann K: Developmentally regulated expression of the transmembrane adaptor protein trim in fetal and adult T cells. Scand J Immunol. 2001, 54: 146-154. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2001.00953.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Alcover A, Alarcon B: Internalization and intracellular fate of TCR-CD3 complexes. Crit Rev Immunol. 2000, 20: 325-346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Niedergang F, San Jose E, Rubin B, Alarcon B, Dautry-Varsat A, Alcover A: Differential cytosolic tail dependence and intracellular fate of T-cell receptors internalized upon activation with superantigen or phorbol ester. Res Immunol. 1997, 148: 231-245. 10.1016/S0923-2494(97)80865-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Valitutti S, Muller S, Salio M, Lanzavecchia A: Degradation of T cell receptor (TCR)-CD3-zeta complexes after antigenic stimulation. J Exp Med. 1997, 185: 1859-1864. 10.1084/jem.185.10.1859.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ouchida R, Yamasaki S, Hikida M, Masuda K, Kawamura K, Wada A, Mochizuki S, Tagawa M, Sakamoto A, Hatano M, Tokuhisa T, Koseki H, Saito T, Kurosaki T, Wang JY: A lysosomal protein negatively regulates surface T cell antigen receptor expression by promoting CD3zeta-chain degradation. Immunity. 2008, 29: 33-43. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.04.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mellman I: Endocytosis and molecular sorting. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996, 12: 575-625. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang HY, Altman Y, Fang D, Elly C, Dai Y, Shao Y, Liu YC: Cbl promotes ubiquitination of the T cell receptor zeta through an adaptor function of Zap-70. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 26004-26011. 10.1074/jbc.M010738200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Naramura M, Jang IK, Kole H, Huang F, Haines D, Gu H: c-Cbl and Cbl-b regulate T cell responsiveness by promoting ligand-induced TCR down-modulation. Nat Immunol. 2002, 3: 1192-1199. 10.1038/ni855.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Myers MD, Dragone LL, Weiss A: Src-like adaptor protein down-regulates T cell receptor (TCR)-CD3 expression by targeting TCRzeta for degradation. J Cell Biol. 2005, 170: 285-294. 10.1083/jcb.200501164.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Myers MD, Sosinowski T, Dragone LL, White C, Band H, Gu H, Weiss A: Src-like adaptor protein regulates TCR expression on thymocytes by linking the ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl to the TCR complex. Nat Immunol. 2006, 7: 57-66. 10.1038/ni1291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Dietrich J, Backstrom T, Lauritsen JP, Kastrup J, Christensen MD, von Bulow F, Palmer E, Geisler C: The phosphorylation state of CD3gamma influences T cell responsiveness and controls T cell receptor cycling. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 24232-24238. 10.1074/jbc.273.37.24232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. San Jose E, Borroto A, Niedergang F, Alcover A, Alarcon B: Triggering the TCR complex causes the downregulation of nonengaged receptors by a signal transduction-dependent mechanism. Immunity. 2000, 12: 161-170. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80169-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Borroto A, Lama J, Niedergang F, Dautry-Varsat A, Alarcon B, Alcover A: The CD3 epsilon subunit of the TCR contains endocytosis signals. J Immunol. 1999, 163: 25-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schraven B, Roux M, Hutmacher B, Meuer SC: Triggering of the alternative pathway of human T cell activation involves members of the T 200 family of glycoproteins. Eur J Immunol. 1989, 19: 397-403. 10.1002/eji.1830190226.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fernandez-Malave E, Wang N, Pulgar M, Schamel WW, Alarcon B, Terhorst C: Overlapping functions of human CD3{delta} and mouse CD3{gamma} in {alpha}beta T-cell development revealed in a humanized CD3{gamma}-deficient mouse. Blood. 2006, 108: 3420-3427. 10.1182/blood-2006-03-010850.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. San Jose E, Sahuquillo AG, Bragado R, Alarcon B: Assembly of the TCR/CD3 complex: CD3 epsilon/delta and CD3 epsilon/gamma dimers associate indistinctly with both TCR alpha and TCR beta chains. Evidence for a double TCR heterodimer model. Eur J Immunol. 1998, 28: 12-21. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199801)28:01<12::AID-IMMU12>3.0.CO;2-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schägger H, von Jagow G: Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal Biochem. 1991, 199: 223-231. 10.1016/0003-2697(91)90094-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schamel WW, Reth M: Monomeric and oligomeric complexes of the B cell antigen receptor. Immunity. 2000, 13: 5-14. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00003-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Swamy M, Siegers GM, Minguet S, Wollscheid B, Schamel WW: Blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) for the identification and analysis of multiprotein complexes. Sci STKE. 2006, 2006: l4-10.1126/stke.3452006pl4.Google Scholar
  49. Schamel WW: Two-dimensional blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2008, Chapter 6 (Unit 6): 10.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Swamy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement