Skip to main content
Download PDF

Tumor immune escape: extracellular vesicles roles and therapeutics application

Cell Communication and Signaling volume 22, Article number: 9 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Immune escape, a process by which tumor cells evade immune surveillance, remains a challenge for cancer therapy. Tumor cells produce extracellular vesicles (EVs) that participate in immune escape by transferring bioactive molecules between cells.

The main body of the abstract

EVs refer to heterogeneous vesicles that participate in intercellular communication. EVs from tumor cells usually carry tumor antigens and have been considered a source of tumor antigens to induce anti-tumor immunity. However, evidence also suggests that these EVs can accelerate immune escape by carrying heat shock proteins (HSPs), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), etc. to immune cells, suppressing function and exhausting the immune cells pool. EVs are progressively being evaluated for therapeutic implementation in cancer therapies. EVs-based immunotherapies involve inhibiting EVs generation, using natural EVs, and harnessing engineering EVs. All approaches are associated with advantages and disadvantages. The EVs heterogeneity and diverse physicochemical properties are the main challenges to their clinical applications.

Short conclusion

Although EVs are criminal; they can be useful for overcoming immune escape. This review discusses the latest knowledge on EVs population and sheds light on the function of tumor-derived EVs in immune escape. It also describes EVs-based immunotherapies with a focus on engineered EVs, followed by challenges that hinder the clinical translation of EVs that are essential to be addressed in future investigations.

Video Abstract

Background

The term “Immune escape” or antigen escape refers to a process by which tumor cells evade immune cells' recognition and responses, therefore getting survival and developing into metastatic tumor [1]. The process of Immune escape involves the expression of ligands on tumors cells and the release of immunosuppression factors that block function and exhaust the immune cells pool [1]. The immunosuppressive microenvironment of a tumor has an imperative role in cancer development and even immunotherapy responses [2]. Since immune escape is a main factor for tumor growth, such immune checkpoint-associated proteins as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death-1 (PD-1); and other molecules have become the topic of extreme examination [3, 4]. Cancer is a large group of diseases that influences human society and the healthcare system [5, 6]. Recent progress in tumor cell biology has revealed the key functions of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in regulating immune responses and the immune escape of cancer cells [7]. EVs are double-phospholipid vesicles released by various tumor cells participate in cell communication [8, 9]. They contain multiple ranges of biomolecules on the surface of their lumen, carrying between cells, and exchanging information [8, 9]. The term EVs is wide-ranging and can encompass numerous vesicles like exosomes, ectosomes, and other different types of vesicles that are released by various cells [10]. In this regard, the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) was established in 2011, which sponsored the improvement and application of different EVs. In 2014 and then in 2018, the paper ‘Minimal Information for Studies of EVs’ (MISEV) guidelines was released for the standardization of this field regarding terms, isolation methods, characterization methods, and applications in preclinical and clinical trials [11, 12]. Tumor-derived EVs function as a double-edged sword since they can promote cancer growth and metastasis by lessening cytotoxicity, causing remodeling, and conserving immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment as well as can make up anti-cancer immune responses by delivering tumor antigens and various heat shock proteins (HSPs) like HSP90 and HSP70 [13, 14]. PD-L1 has been reported on tumor derived EVs, which may act like those of cancer cells, inducing immune escape [15]. Although the immunosuppressive impact of EVs-PD-L1 is confirmed; however, EVs-PD-L1 have positive effects. For example, the inhibitory role of PD-L1 could support wound healing and tissue repair [16]. Because acute pro-inflammatory conditions after trauma may worsen tissue harm [17]. There are still several problems that need to be considered in cancer therapy, like the escapes of immune surveillance and immune cell suppression [18, 19]. In recent years, to overcome immune escape, EVs-based therapies have emerged, for example inhibiting EVs generation by tumor cells or using immune cells-derived natural EVs approaches [20, 21]. Along with the advance and success of EVs-based research, engineered EVs are appealing to growing attention, particularly in tumor cell escape, because of their loading and temporal targeting aptitude [22] (Table 1). Each of these methods is associated with advantages and disadvantages (Table 2). For clinical translation, many steps are needed because EVs are heterogeneous in size, function and physicochemical properties [10]. Besides, the process engineering requires optimal methods regarding the type of EVs and loading methods as well as the type of cargo (see reviews [23,24,25]). This review aims to weigh the potential of EVs in inducing immune escape and highlights the significance of EVs experiments for beneficial applications in immune escape. First, we define EVs biology and heterogeneity. Next, the function of tumor derived EVs that cause immune escape will be discussed. Further sections will describe possible application of EVs for immune escape, natural EVs and engineered EVs, highlighting challenges for promising clinical application.

Table 1 Facts of extracellular vesicles and their role in immune escape mechanism and treatment
Full size table
Table 2 Challenge in extracellular vesicles-based studies
Full size table

Extracellular vesicles

Many eukaryotic cells communicate with other cells through the interchange of EVs [26]. EVs, a population of heterogeneous vesicles, contain phospholipid bilayer-membrane encircled different types of biomolecules that can be captured by recipient cells located either adjacent or distant [26]. However, it remains uncertain whether cells release EVs principally to evacuate cellular waste or unnecessary products, for intercellular communication, for cargo delivery, for spreading disease, or a combination of all [27,28,29]. Because EVs pathway shows crosstalk with other cellular signaling pathways [30]. However, EVs are broadly considered the most important factor in regulating physiological and pathological milieu. A growing body of literature has shown that EVs can affect target cells function in several ways including, internalization pathways, cargo delivery into the cytoplasm by direct fusion, and ligand-receptor interactions [31, 32]. The term EVs is general and comprise heterogeneous subpopulations of cell-derived particles with various size and morphologies [10]. The most famous subpopulations of EVs include exosomes and ectosomes [33, 34]. Exosomes can be divided into subpopulations; however, their range size is 30 to 150 nm, originating from endocytosis pathways within multivesicular bodies (MVBs) where several complexes and molecules are participating in forming intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) and loading biological cargo into ILVs. When ILVs within MVBs are released out of cell so-called exosomes, which process needs fusion of MVBs with the plasma membrane [35]. Not all ILVs culminate in to be exosomes, although ILVs are originators of exosomes. Alternatively, MVBs may fuse with lysosomes for degradation ILVs, even with autoghosomes [36]. A hybrid of exosomes and autophagosome form amphisomes, which also can release exosomes [37]. A growing body of evidence suggests that different MVB populations are present within a cell, proposing ILV subpopulations for degradation or elimination, then the regulation of this balance is not clear [8, 38, 39]. Interestingly, when degradation by lysosomes was inhibited, exosome production was increased, representing that these MVBs also have abilities to release ILVs as exosomes [40, 41]. Various ILV generation- and loading mechanisms have been suggested, which result in subpopulations of MVBs/exosomes. Besides, it was suggested that a single MVBs may contain different ILVs subpopulations [42]. It seems that exosome cargo loading is a regulated process and various mechanisms participate. Such markers as LAMP1/2, syntenin, various proteins from the ESCRT complex, CD81, CD9, and CD63 are often reported as specific markers for exosomes [43, 44]. Another EVs family is ectosomes, for example, microvesicles; which originate by blebbing of the plasma membrane, showing the composition of the plasma membrane [45]. Various ectosome subpopulations, produced via diverse biogenesis pathways, have been defined during several physiological cell stages or by many cell types [34] (Fig. 1). Ectosomes contain cell membrane markers and are very heterogeneous in size. Some typical markers such as SLC3A2, ARF6, annexin A1/2, and basigin, as well as CD9 and CD81, have been suggested to be the most specific [43]. Overall, because of the heterogeneous nature of EVs, they play a multipurpose function in physiological and pathological conditions [46,47,48]. EVs contribute to regulating different types of diseases such as cancers. EVs from Immune cells are also heterogeneous in route of biogenesis, size and cargo and are present in the blood, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine [49, 50], participating in different dimensions of tumors.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Heterogeneity in extracellular vesicles (EVs). Cells produce various types of EVs, which are different in route of biogenesis, shape, size, and cargo. In general, EVs may divided into two major groups including ectosomes and exosomes; both contain subgroups. Exosomes are the most common EVs that considerably were investigated in cell culture and animal models. Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) within cells are a place where exosomes are generated and loaded with biological cargo. Rather than a secretory pathway, MVBs may fuse with lysosomes or autophagasomes vesicles to produce amphisomes. Exosomes have subpopulations themselves based on size and cargo. Other EVs such as microvesicles, apoptotic bodies and other small EVs are generated by cells. Similar to exosomes, microvesicles have been studied for their pivotal roles in immune responses and drug delivery systems

Full size image

Role of EVs in immune escape

EVs carrying PD-L1

The roles of different EVs from various cancer cells in inducing immune responses have been reported. Tumour cells escape immune identification by increasing the expression levels of PD-L1 that binds to PD-1 receptors on T cells to provoke the immune checkpoint response [51]. This action induces tumor growth. The PD-1/PD-L1 interaction are far more complex. PD-1 have two ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. PD-L1 is mainly expressed on different cells such as tumor-associated dendritic cells (DCs) [52], macrophages [52], neutrophils [53], monocyte-derived myeloid DCs [54], mast cells [55], fibroblasts [56], and other non-cancerous cells [57]. PD-L2 is expressed in DCs [58] and macrophages [59]. Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 are present in several tumor cells. Recent studies have indicated that EVs-PD-L1 can be more effective than tumor cell-associated PD-L1 in expediting escape from antitumor immunity since EVs can be prevalent in body fluids and may bind to their recipient cells more simply than tumor cells [60]. In glioblastoma cancer, interferon-γ (IFN-γ) stimulated PD-L1 expression on EVs, which inhibited T cell activation. In addition, circulating EVs of glioblastoma patients contain PD-L1 DNA that is correlated with tumor size [61]. EVs from metastatic melanomas have been shown to express PD-L1 on their surface. Several cell culture and animal models showed that exposure to IFN-γ up-regulated the amount of PD-L1 EVs, which inhibited the function of CD8 + T cells and promoted tumor growth. In metastatic melanoma patients, the amount of circulating EVs-PD-L1 is positively associated with that of IFN-γ, and differs following anti-PD-1 therapy [62], Inhibiting the cystine/glutamate transporter cystine-glutamate exchange resulted in higher PD-L1 levels in melanoma and increased EVs-PD-L1 secretion, which in turn induced M2 macrophage polarization and prevented the efficiency of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in melanoma [63]. The presence of PD-L1 in EVs of human and mouse breast cancer has been described in vitro and in vivo [64]. These EVs repressed the T-cell activation proteins for example CD3/CD28-driven ERK phosphorylation and NF-κB signaling, along with IL-2 secretion. The authors concluded that these EVs could bind to PD-1 and destroy T-cell function, thus inhibiting tumor growth in animal models [64]. The result reported by Chatterjee and co-workers found that TGF-β up-regulated PD-L1 on EVs from breast cancer cells that participated in CD8 T-cell dysfunction by weakening phosphorylation of T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling [65]. Furthermore, in the xenograft mouse model of oral squamous cell carcinoma, mitochondrial Lon-induced EVs containing PD-L1 (EVs-PD-L1) could induce the production of IFN and IL-6 from M2 macrophages, which promoted T-cell dysfunction and tumor progression [66]. Chemotherapies have been shown to induce the production of EVs-PD-L1, which contributes to immunosuppression responses in gastric cancer via the miR-940/Cbl-b/STAT5A axis [67]. In addition, radiotherapy can increase EVs-PDL-1 which promotes immune escape and increases tumor growth [68]. In prostate cancer, Poggio et al. declared that the genetic block of EVs-PD-L1 prolonged survival by endorsing anti-tumor immunity. These EVs suppressed T cell activity in the draining lymph node. They reported that the systemically administration of EVs-PD-L1 rescued the progress of tumors unable to produce their own [69]. Stem cell-derived EVs may participate in immune scape. For example, EVs from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of cancerous mice carry PD-L1 that prevented CD8 + T cells proliferation and activation in experimental models, a role tumor immunosuppression [70] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Role of tumor derived EVs in driving immune escape process. Different molecules carried by EVs from tumor cells participate in inducing immune escape

Full size image

The distinct roles of other tumor derived EVs in immune escape have been prepared in Table 3.

Table 3 Role of EVs- PD-L1 in immune escape
Full size table

Other molecules

EVs from metastatic oral cancer loaded with HSP90 could induce tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) polarization to an M2 phenotype that promotes tumor development [81]. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-derived EVs carry CD73, which supports cancer progression and causes immune evasion [82]. These EVs promoted the activity of NF-κB pathway in TAMs, thus preventing immune responses by promoting cytokines production like TNF-α, IL-10, IL-6, and TGF-β1 [82]. EVs derived from melanoma cells can reach draining lymph nodes and macrophages. These EVs contain tumor antigens that lead to apoptosis in antigen-specific CD8 + T cells and tumor immune inhibition [83]. Melanoma cell-derived EVs stimulate the immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs in regulating T cells. For instance, Andreola et al. found that FasL-bearing EVs could stimulate MDSC differentiation through prostaglandin E2 and TGF-β signaling, which lessened MDSC-mediated immunosuppression [84]. They showed that these EVs up-regulated the expression of Cox2, arginase-1, and VEGF in the MDSCs. EVs from two mouse tumor cell lines (the melanoma line MO5 and the thymoma line EG7) expressing the OVA antigen. Participated in prompting tumor antigen-specific immunosuppression, probably by inhibiting DC maturation and modulating the APCs function [85]. EVs from the cerebrospinal fluid of glioblastoma patients carry LGALS9, which could inhibit DCs antigen presentation and T-cell immunity [86]. For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Ye et al. reported that HMGB1 from tumor cells promotes immune avoidance of HCC by stimulating TIM-1 + regulatory B cell growth [87]. Recently, it was demonstrated that circGSE1 cargo of EVs of HCC cells increased the development of HCC by prompting Tregs development via inducing the miR-324-5p/TGFBR1/Smad3 signaling. Authors concluded that these EVs can serve as a hopeful biomarker for HCC immunotherapy [88]. TGF-β1 cargo of EVs from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma contain molecules that hurt NK cell function by lessening expression of CD107a, NKG2D, INF-γ, and TNF-α, also revealed to damage glucose uptake capacity by NK cells [89]. We presented other studies in Table 4.

Table 4 Role of several cargoes of EVs in immune escape
Full size table

EVs-based therapies for overcome immune escape: further directions

As mentioned above, EVs released from tumor cells participate in immune escape and immunosuppression, therefore, inhibiting EVs biogenesis, secretion, and internalization may be a possible mechanism for preventing immune evade (for further study see literature [104]) (Fig. 3). Different agents or pharmacological inhibitors may block EVs kinetics [105, 106]. For example, in our recent study, we found that Gallic acid inhibited exosomes biogenesis from two breast cancer cells. We concluded that Gallic acid may serve as an antitumor agent [107]. Reversely, in another study, we found that metformin, an ant-diabetic drug, increased exosomes secretion from glioblastoma cells, suggesting a resistance against therapy [108]. In a study, it was demonstrated that iron death inducer and GW4869 decreased the production of EVs from tumor cells and declined the immunosuppressive impact of EVs-PD-L1 that encouraged anti-cancer immune response of melanoma cells and induced CD + 8 T cells and immune memory [109]. Thus, the evidence from these studies suggests that inhibiting EVs may be a useful approach to overcome immune evade, however, some limitations may remain to be solved. For instance, many of these studies were conducted in vitro comprising cell lines and a low number of animal studies. Therefore, the side effects and systematic toxicity may be associated with these agents. In addition, these agents must only block EVs from cancer cells not from stem or healthy cells. As well, the pharmaceutics of these agents should be determined because EVs biogenesis is cross-talked with other signaling pathways. An inhibition in EVs biogenesis may be compensated with other pathways, causing cancer resistance and bystander effects.

In the exploration for innovative therapeutics, EVs therapies may stand star for overcoming immune escape. The most famous method is using DCs-derived EVs like exosomes for immunotherapy. This method was intensively reviewed in the literature [110, 111], where authors indicated that antigen-loaded exosomes can induce potent antitumor immunity. DCs-derived EVs can both directly and indirectly activate CD + 8 T cells, CD + 4 T cells, NKs, and even B cells for anticancer immunity. Furthermore, DCs-EVs based cancer immunotherapy has been studied in clinical trials [112, 113]. The idea of engaging DC-EVs as an antitumor vaccine approach is using nature’s antigen delivery system for vaccination. Nevertheless, the low clinical efficiency of these vaccines in the stimulation of adaptive immune responses remains a challenge and needs further studies because it seems that the stage of disease and chemotherapy regime are involved in immunotherapy efficacy (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Extracellular vesicles (EVs)-based therapies for overcoming immune escape. To overcome immune escape several EVs-based therapies such as; EVs-therapy from immune cells, inhibiting EVs biogenesis and uptake, and engineering/modifying EVs from different cells (cancer cells, immune cells, and stem cells) have been reported. MVB: multivesicular body; MVs: microvesicles

Full size image

Engineered EVs to overcome immune escape

The harnessing of EVs in cancer therapy as a drug delivery system is now being recognized. In this context, EVs are either modified or loaded with optional cargo to overcome tumor expansion and even immune escape. Besides reinforcement, the efficacy of anticancer therapies, engineered EVs, as a novel drug delivery tool, might improve the unwanted effects and side effects of therapies including, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. EVs may genetically be modified or exogenously loaded with therapeutic drugs. However, a survey of literature shows a heterogeneity in both EVs source and engineering methods. However, each engineering technique has its benefits and difficulties and the ‘one-size-fits-all’ engineering method has not been approved yet. For example, recently researchers genetically modified macrophages to overexpress hsa_circ_0004658, which was also carried by their exosomes. When these exosomes co-cultured with HCC cells profoundly inhibited cell growth via miR-499b-5p/JAM3 signaling [33]. Recently, Chen et al. engineered an MDA-MB-231 cell line to express a high-affinity mutant human PD-1 protein (havPD-1) and suppress endogenous β-2 microglobulin and PD-L1. These EVs decreased the growth of PD-L1 overexpressed tumor cells and prompted cell death, suggesting a potential for immunotherapy [114]. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, MSCs-derived EVs were used to carry siRNA and drugs to cancer cells. MSCs-derived EVs containing oxaliplatin (OXA) and galectin-9 siRNA could prompt cell death, and inverse the suppressive tumor immune microenvironment, for instance, preventing polarization of M2 macrophage and the enrolment of T cells, therefore enhancing immunotherapy effectiveness in vitro and in vivo [115]. In an HCC study, EVs were isolated from mouse H22 cells co-cultured with PIONs@E6 and then incubated with macrophages. Findings showed that these EVs promoted immunity against HCC via inducing M1 macrophage polarization and ROS production. Furthermore, PIONs-contained EVs could suppress tumor development in HCC animal model [116]. In pancreatic cancer, Panc-1 cells were loaded with miR-125b2 and miRNA-155 and then EVs were isolated. EVs contain both miRNAs, which could alter the macrophage polarization from M2 to M1 phenotype, favorable for cancer therapy [117]. Table 5 presents the immunological-engineered EVs for cancers. These findings suggest that harnessing engineered EVs showed a hopeful outcome in inducing immune responses and overcoming the immune escape of tumor cells. For clinical translation of these results, further studies are essential.

Table 5 Engineered EVs for immunological responses in cancer
Full size table

Conclusion

Immune escape is a hallmark for tumor development and growth, and may also elucidate the failure of immunotherapy. Tumor cells recruit different mechanism to escape from immune cells, for example, they express PD-L1, which bind to PD-1 on immune cells, thus preventing the T cells function. PD-L1 and other molecules can be transferred by EVs of cancer cells through the biological fluids and cause immunosuppression. Several studies including cell culture and tumor models have shown that EVs from tumor cells containing cargoes like PD-L1 or other molecules play an important function in the immune escape of numerous cancers. These EVs can directly or indirectly suppress several immune cells such as macrophages and T cells. Due to a heterogeneity in EVs types and cargoes, it seems that immune escape elicited by EVs is not simple and different pathways may be involved. EVs-based therapies for overcoming immune escape have been suggested, for example, inhibiting EVs biogenesis and actions. In addition, EVs from immune cells such as DCs or lymphocytes may potent immune responses against tumor cells. Natural EVs may not do effectively on immune responses and even suppress immune cells. EVs could serve as a drug delivery platform for cancer therapy. EVs can be modified or loaded with therapeutic molecules on their cargo or/and on the surface to interact with tumor and immune cells, causing profound antitumor immunity. Several molecules are conjugated into different EVs, which induce T cells and macrophage responses and inhibit tumor growth in preclinical experiments. All EVs-based therapies have several advantages and disadvantages regarding either technical or outcomes. EVs-based clinical application is hindered by the heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of optimized engineering methods.

Availability of data and materials

None.

Abbreviations

EVs:

Extracellular vesicles

HSPs:

Heat shock proteins

PD-L1:

Programmed death-ligand 1

PD-1:

Programmed death-1

ISEV:

International Society for Extracellular Vesicles

MISEV:

Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular vesicles

T-EVs:

Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles

MVB:

Multivesicular bodies

ILVs:

Intraluminal vesicles

DCs:

Dendritic cells

IFN-γ:

Interferon-γ

TCR:

T-cell receptor

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

MHC- 1:

Major histocompatibility complex 1

HMGB1:

High mobility group box 1

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

TAM:

Tumor-associated macrophage

MDSCs:

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells

TGF-β:

Transforming Growth Factor β

OVA:

Ovalbumin

VEGF:

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

APCs:

Antigen-presenting cells

LGALS9:

Galectin9

ICD:

Immunogenic cell death

References

  1. Beatty GL, Gladney WL. Immune escape mechanisms as a guide for cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:687–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Y, Cao X. Immunosuppressive cells in tumor immune escape and metastasis. J Mol Med. 2016;94:509–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ri MH, Ma J, Jin X. Development of natural products for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy against cancer. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;281: 114370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ishikawa M, Nakayama K, Nakamura K, Yamashita H, Ishibashi T, Minamoto T, Iida K, Razia S, Ishikawa N, Nakayama S. High PD-1 expression level is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302:209–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Babaei M, Pirnejad H, Rezaie J, Roshandel G, Hoseini R. Association between socioeconomic factors and the risk of gastric cancer incidence: results from an ecological study. Iran J Public Health. 2023;52:1739.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Babaei M, Hasanzadeh S, Pirnejad H, Mohebbi I, Hoseini R, Niazkhani Z. Socioeconomic status and severity of traffic accident injuries: a cross-sectional study. Iran Occupational Health. 2022;19:380–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rezaie J, Etemadi T, Feghhi M. The distinct roles of exosomes in innate immune responses and therapeutic applications in cancer. Eur J Pharmacol. 2022:933:175292.

  8. Van Niel G, d’Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:213–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feghhi M, Rezaie J, Akbari A, Jabbari N, Jafari H, Seidi F, Szafert S. Effect of multi-functional polyhydroxylated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) nanoparticles on the angiogenesis and exosome biogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Mater Des. 2021;197:109227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van de Wakker SI, Meijers FM, Sluijter JPG, Vader P. Extracellular vesicle heterogeneity and its impact for regenerative medicine applications. Pharmacol Rev. 2023;75:1043–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, Antoniou A, Arab T, Archer F, Atkin-Smith GK. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7:1535750.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lötvall J, Hill AF, Hochberg F, Buzás EI, Di Vizio D, Gardiner C, Gho YS, Kurochkin IV, Mathivanan S, Quesenberry P: Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: a position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. vol. 3. Taylor & Francis; 2014:26913.

  13. Taghikhani A, Farzaneh F, Sharifzad F, Mardpour S, Ebrahimi M, Hassan ZM. Engineered tumor-derived extracellular vesicles: potentials in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2020;11:221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma J, Zhang H, Tang K, Huang B. Tumor-derived microparticles in tumor immunology and immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol. 2020;50:1653–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu F, Gu Y, Kang B, Heskia F, Pachot A, Bonneville M, Wei P, Liang J. PD-L1 detection on circulating tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (T-EVs) from patients with lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10:2441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Su D, Tsai H-I, Xu Z, Yan F, Wu Y, Xiao Y, Liu X, Wu Y, Parvanian S, Zhu W. Exosomal PD-L1 functions as an immunosuppressant to promote wound healing. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9:1709262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin P, Leibovich SJ. Inflammatory cells during wound repair: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:599–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Czystowska-Kuzmicz M, Sosnowska A, Nowis D, Ramji K, Szajnik M, Chlebowska-Tuz J, Wolinska E, Gaj P, Grazul M, Pilch Z. Small extracellular vesicles containing arginase-1 suppress T-cell responses and promote tumor growth in ovarian carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3000.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mincheva-Nilsson L, Baranov V: Cancer exosomes and NKG2D receptor–ligand interactions: Impairing NKG2D-mediated cytotoxicity and anti-tumour immune surveillance. In Seminars in Cancer Biology. Elsevier; 2014: 24–30.

  20. Zhang H, Lu J, Liu J, Zhang G, Lu A. Advances in the discovery of exosome inhibitors in cancer. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2020;35:1322–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao Y, Fu C, Zhou L, Mi Q-S, Jiang A. DC-derived exosomes for cancer immunotherapy. Cancers. 2021;13:3667.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu C, Wang Y, Li L, He D, Chi J, Li Q, Wu Y, Zhao Y, Zhang S, Wang L. Engineered extracellular vesicles and their mimetics for cancer immunotherapy. J Control Release. 2022;349:679–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rezaie J, Nejati V, Mahmoodi M, Ahmadi M. Mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles: a promising nanomedicine for drug delivery system. Biochem Pharmacol. 2022:203:115167.

  24. Ahmadi M, Hassanpour M, Rezaie J. Engineered extracellular vesicles: a novel platform for cancer combination therapy and cancer immunotherapy. Life Sci. 2022:308:120935.

  25. Hassanzadeh A, Ashrafihelan J, Salehi R, Rahbarghazi R, Firouzamandi M, Ahmadi M, Khaksar M, Alipour M, Aghazadeh M. Development and biocompatibility of the injectable collagen/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds as in situ forming hydrogel for the hard tissue engineering application. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2021;49:136–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Raposo G, Stahl PD. Extracellular vesicles: a new communication paradigm? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:509–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bewicke-Copley F, Mulcahy LA, Jacobs LA, Samuel P, Akbar N, Pink RC, Carter DRF. Extracellular vesicles released following heat stress induce bystander effect in unstressed populations. J Extracell Vesicles. 2017;6:1340746.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takahashi A, Okada R, Nagao K, Kawamata Y, Hanyu A, Yoshimoto S, Takasugi M, Watanabe S, Kanemaki MT, Obuse C. Exosomes maintain cellular homeostasis by excreting harmful DNA from cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hassanpour M, Rezaie J, Darabi M, Hiradfar A, Rahbarghazi R, Nouri M. Autophagy modulation altered differentiation capacity of CD146+ cells toward endothelial cells, pericytes, and cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Baixauli F, López-Otín C, Mittelbrunn M. Exosomes and autophagy: coordinated mechanisms for the maintenance of cellular fitness. Front Immunol. 2014;5:403.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mulcahy LA, Pink RC, Carter DRF. Routes and mechanisms of extracellular vesicle uptake. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3:24641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. French KC, Antonyak MA, Cerione RA. Extracellular vesicle docking at the cellular port: Extracellular vesicle binding and uptake. In Seminars in cell & developmental biology. Elsevier; 2017:67:48–55.

  33. Zhang L, Zhang J, Li P, Li T, Zhou Z, Wu H. Exosomal hsa_circ_0004658 derived from RBPJ overexpressed-macrophages inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression via miR-499b-5p/JAM3. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Buzas EI. The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23:236–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hessvik NP, Llorente A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:193–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fader C, Colombo M. Autophagy and multivesicular bodies: two closely related partners. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:70–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jeppesen DK, Fenix AM, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Zhang Q, Zimmerman LJ, Liebler DC, Ping J, Liu Q, Evans R. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell. 2019;177(428–445):e418.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Buschow SI, Nolte-‘t Hoen EN, Van Niel G, Pols MS, Ten Broeke T, Lauwen M, Ossendorp F, Melief CJ, Raposo G, Wubbolts R. MHC II in dendritic cells is targeted to lysosomes or T cell-induced exosomes via distinct multivesicular body pathways. Traffic. 2009;10:1528–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Klumperman J, Raposo G. The complex ultrastructure of the endolysosomal system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6:a016857.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Villarroya-Beltri C, Baixauli F, Mittelbrunn M, Fernández-Delgado I, Torralba D, Moreno-Gonzalo O, Baldanta S, Enrich C, Guerra S, Sánchez-Madrid F. ISGylation controls exosome secretion by promoting lysosomal degradation of MVB proteins. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ortega FG, Roefs MT, de Miguel Perez D, Kooijmans SA, de Jong OG, Sluijter JP, Schiffelers RM, Vader P. Interfering with endolysosomal trafficking enhances release of bioactive exosomes. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2019;20:102014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zabeo D, Cvjetkovic A, Lässer C, Schorb M, Lötvall J, Höög JL. Exosomes purified from a single cell type have diverse morphology. J Extracell Vesicles. 2017;6:1329476.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mathieu M, Névo N, Jouve M, Valenzuela JI, Maurin M, Verweij FJ, Palmulli R, Lankar D, Dingli F, Loew D. Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellular tracking of CD63 and CD9. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Andreu Z, Yáñez-Mó M. Tetraspanins in extracellular vesicle formation and function. Front Immunol. 2014;5:442.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tricarico C, Clancy J, D’Souza-Schorey C. Biology and biogenesis of shed microvesicles. Small GTPases. 2017;8:220–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Willms E, Cabañas C, Mäger I, Wood MJ, Vader P. Extracellular vesicle heterogeneity: subpopulations, isolation techniques, and diverse functions in cancer progression. Front Immunol. 2018;9:738.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Whiteside T. Exosomes carrying immunoinhibitory proteins and their role in cancer. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017;189:259–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Inamdar S, Nitiyanandan R, Rege K. Emerging applications of exosomes in cancer therapeutics and diagnostics. Bioeng Transl Med. 2017;2:70–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yáñez-Mó M, Siljander PR-M, Andreu Z, Bedina Zavec A, Borràs FE, Buzas EI, Buzas K, Casal E, Cappello F, Carvalho J. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4:27066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hassani A, Avci ÇB, Kerdar SN, Amini H, Amini M, Ahmadi M, Sakai S, Bagca BG, Ozates NP, Rahbarghazi R. Interaction of alginate with nano-hydroxyapatite-collagen using strontium provides suitable osteogenic platform. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20:310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Litak J, Mazurek M, Grochowski C, Kamieniak P, Roliński J. PD-L1/PD-1 axis in glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:5347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Peng Q, Qiu X, Zhang Z, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Liang Y, Guo J, Peng H, Chen M, Fu Y-X. PD-L1 on dendritic cells attenuates T cell activation and regulates response to immune checkpoint blockade. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cheng Y, Li H, Deng Y, Tai Y, Zeng K, Zhang Y, Liu W, Zhang Q, Yang Y. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce PDL1+ neutrophils through the IL6-STAT3 pathway that foster immune suppression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:422.

  54. Curiel TJ, Wei S, Dong H, Alvarez X, Cheng P, Mottram P, Krzysiek R, Knutson KL, Daniel B, Zimmermann MC. Blockade of B7–H1 improves myeloid dendritic cell-mediated antitumor immunity. Nat Med. 2003;9:562–7.

  55. Hirano T, Honda T, Kanameishi S, Honda Y, Egawa G, Kitoh A, Nakajima S, Otsuka A, Nomura T, Dainichi T. PD-L1 on mast cells suppresses effector CD8(+) T-cell activation in the skin in murine contact hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148:563–73.

  56. Teramoto K, Igarashi T, Kataoka Y, Ishida M, Hanaoka J, Sumimoto H, Daigo Y. Clinical significance of PD-L1-positive cancer-associated fibroblasts in pN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2019;137:56–63.

  57. Sun C, Mezzadra R, Schumacher TN. Regulation and function of the PD-L1 checkpoint. Immunity. 2018;48:434–52.

  58. Garo LP, Ajay AK, Fujiwara M, Beynon V, Kuhn C, Gabriely G, Sadhukan S, Raheja R, Rubino S, Weiner HL, Murugaiyan G. Smad7 controls immunoregulatory PDL2/1-PD1 signaling in intestinal inflammation and autoimmunity. Cell Rep. 2019;28:3353–66.

  59. Loke P, Allison JP: PD-L1 and PD-L2 are differentially regulated by Th1 and Th2 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:5336–41.

  60. Kim DH, Kim H, Choi YJ, Kim SY, Lee J-E, Sung KJ, Sung YH, Pack C-G, Jung M-K, Han B, et al. Exosomal PD-L1 promotes tumor growth through immune escape in non-small cell lung cancer. Exper Mol Med. 2019;51:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ricklefs FL, Alayo Q, Krenzlin H, Mahmoud AB, Speranza MC, Nakashima H, Hayes JL, Lee K, Balaj L, Passaro C. Immune evasion mediated by PD-L1 on glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaar2766.

  62. Chen G, Huang AC, Zhang W, Zhang G, Wu M, Xu W, Yu Z, Yang J, Wang B, Sun H, et al. Exosomal PD-L1 contributes to immunosuppression and is associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature. 2018;560:382–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu N, Zhang J, Yin M, Liu H, Zhang X, Li J, Yan B, Guo Y, Zhou J, Tao J. Inhibition of xCT suppresses the efficacy of anti-PD-1/L1 melanoma treatment through exosomal PD-L1-induced macrophage M2 polarization. Mol Ther. 2021;29:2321–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Yang Y, Li CW, Chan LC, Wei Y, Hsu JM, Xia W, Cha JH, Hou J, Hsu JL, Sun L, Hung MC. Exosomal PD-L1 harbors active defense function to suppress T cell killing of breast cancer cells and promote tumor growth. Cell Res. 2018;28:862–4.

  65. Chatterjee S, Chatterjee A, Jana S, Dey S, Roy H, Das MK, Alam J, Adhikary A, Chowdhury A, Biswas A. Transforming growth factor beta orchestrates PD-L1 enrichment in tumor-derived exosomes and mediates CD8 T-cell dysfunction regulating early phosphorylation of TCR signalome in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2021;42:38–47.

  66. Cheng AN, Cheng LC, Kuo CL, Lo YK, Chou HY, Chen CH, Wang YH, Chuang TH, Cheng SJ, Lee AY. Mitochondrial Lon-induced mtDNA leakage contributes to PD-L1-mediated immunoescape via STING-IFN signaling and extracellular vesicles. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e001372.

  67. Zhang M, Fan Y, Che X, Hou K, Zhang C, Li C, Wen T, Wang S, Cheng Y, Liu Y, Qu X. 5-FU-induced upregulation of exosomal PD-L1 causes immunosuppression in advanced gastric cancer patients. Front Oncol. 2020;10:492.

  68. Timaner M, Kotsofruk R, Raviv Z, Magidey K, Shechter D, Kan T, Nevelsky A, Daniel S, Vries EGE, Zhang T. Microparticles from tumors exposed to radiation promote immune evasion in part by PD-L1. Oncogene. 2020;39:187–203.

  69. Poggio M, Hu T, Pai CC, Chu B, Belair CD, Chang A, Montabana E, Lang UE, Fu Q, Fong L, Blelloch R. Suppression of exosomal PD-L1 Induces systemic anti-tumor immunity and memory. Cell. 2019;177:414–27.

  70. Sun Y, Guo J, Yu L, Guo T, Wang J, Wang X, Chen Y. PD-L1(+) exosomes from bone marrow-derived cells of tumor-bearing mice inhibit antitumor immunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;18:2402–9.

  71. Gabrusiewicz K, Li X, Wei J, Hashimoto Y, Marisetty AL, Ott M, Wang F, Hawke D, Yu J, Healy LM. Glioblastoma stem cell-derived exosomes induce M2 macrophages and PD-L1 expression on human monocytes. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1412909.

  72. Li C, Qiu S, Jin K, Zheng X, Zhou X, Jin D, Xu B, Jin X. Tumor-derived microparticles promote the progression of triple-negative breast cancer via PD-L1-associated immune suppression. Cancer Lett. 2021;523:43–56.

  73. Fan Y, Che X, Qu J, Hou K, Wen T, Li Z, Li C, Wang S, Xu L, Liu Y, Qu X. Exosomal PD-L1 retains immunosuppressive activity and is associated with gastric cancer prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:3745–55.

  74. Shi Y, Zhang J, Mao Z, Jiang H, Liu W, Shi H, Ji R, Xu W, Qian H, Zhang X. Extracellular vesicles from gastric cancer cells induce PD-L1 expression on neutrophils to suppress T-Cell immunity. Front Oncol. 2020;10:629.

  75. Chen J, Lin Z, Liu L, Zhang R, Geng Y, Fan M, Zhu W, Lu M, Lu L, Jia H, et al. GOLM1 exacerbates CD8+ T cell suppression in hepatocellular carcinoma by promoting exosomal PD-L1 transport into tumor-associated macrophages. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Theodoraki MN, Yerneni SS, Hoffmann TK, Gooding WE, Whiteside TL. Clinical significance of PD-L1(+) exosomes in plasma of head and neck cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:896–905.

  77. Liu D, Wang S, Bindeman W. Clinical applications of PD-L1 bioassays for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:1–6.

  78. Morrissey SM, Zhang F, Ding C, Montoya-Durango DE, Hu X, Yang C, Wang Z, Yuan F, Fox M, Zhang HG. Tumor-derived exosomes drive immunosuppressive macrophages in a pre-metastatic niche through glycolytic dominant metabolic reprogramming. Cell Metab. 2021;33:2040–58.

  79. Liu J, Fan L, Yu H, Zhang J, He Y, Feng D, Wang F, Li X, Liu Q, Li Y. Endoplasmic reticulum stress causes liver cancer cells to release exosomal miR-23a-3p and up-regulate programmed death ligand 1 expression in macrophages. Hepatology. 2019;70:241–58.

  80. Haderk F, Schulz R, Iskar M, Cid LL, Worst T, Willmund KV, Schulz A, Warnken U, Seiler J, Benner A. Tumor-derived exosomes modulate PD-L1 expression in monocytes. Sci Immunol. 2017;2:eaah5509.

  81. Ono K, Sogawa C, Kawai H, Tran MT, Taha EA, Lu Y, Oo MW, Okusha Y, Okamura H, Ibaragi S, et al. Triple knockdown of CDC37, HSP90-alpha and HSP90-beta diminishes extracellular vesicles-driven malignancy events and macrophage M2 polarization in oral cancer. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9:1769373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Lu T, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Pan X, Zhu X, Wang X, Li Z, Ruan M, Li H, Chen W, Yan M. CD73 in small extracellular vesicles derived from HNSCC defines tumour-associated immunosuppression mediated by macrophages in the microenvironment. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11:e12218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Leary N, Walser S, He Y, Cousin N, Pereira P, Gallo A, Collado-Diaz V, Halin C, Garcia-Silva S, Peinado H, Dieterich LC. Melanoma-derived extracellular vesicles mediate lymphatic remodelling and impair tumour immunity in draining lymph nodes. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11:e12197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Andreola G, Rivoltini L, Castelli C, Huber V, Perego P, Deho P, Squarcina P, Accornero P, Lozupone F, Lugini L, et al. Induction of lymphocyte apoptosis by tumor cell secretion of FasL-bearing microvesicles. J Exp Med. 2002;195:1303–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Yang C, Kim S-H, Bianco NR, Robbins PD. Tumor-derived exosomes confer antigen-specific immunosuppression in a murine delayed-type hypersensitivity model. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e22517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Wang M, Cai Y, Peng Y, Xu B, Hui W, Jiang Y. Exosomal LGALS9 in the cerebrospinal fluid of glioblastoma patients suppressed dendritic cell antigen presentation and cytotoxic T-cell immunity. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:896.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ye L, Zhang Q, Cheng Y, Chen X, Wang G, Shi M, Zhang T, Cao Y, Pan H, Zhang L. Tumor-derived exosomal HMGB1 fosters hepatocellular carcinoma immune evasion by promoting TIM-1+ regulatory B cell expansion. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Huang M, Huang X, Huang N. Exosomal circGSE1 promotes immune escape of hepatocellular carcinoma by inducing the expansion of regulatory T cells. Cancer Sci. 2022;113:1968–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Zhao J, Schlößer HA, Wang Z, Qin J, Li J, Popp F, Popp MC, Alakus H, Chon S-H, Hansen HP. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit natural killer cell function in pancreatic cancer. Cancers. 2019;11:874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Klibi J, Niki T, Riedel A, Pioche-Durieu C, Souquere S, Rubinstein E, Le Moulec S, Guigay J, Hirashima M, Guemira F. Blood diffusion and Th1-suppressive effects of galectin-9–containing exosomes released by Epstein-Barr virus–infected nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 2009;113:1957–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Czystowska M, Han J, Szczepanski MJ, Szajnik M, Quadrini K, Brandwein H, Hadden JW, Signorelli K, Whiteside TL. IRX-2, a novel immunotherapeutic, protects human T cells from tumor-induced cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:708–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Ham S, Lima LG, Chai EPZ, Muller A, Lobb RJ, Krumeich S, Wen SW, Wiegmans AP, Möller A. Breast cancer-derived exosomes alter macrophage polarization via gp130/STAT3 signaling. Front Immunol. 2018;9:871.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Piao YJ, Kim HS, Hwang EH, Woo J, Zhang M, Moon WK. Breast cancer cell-derived exosomes and macrophage polarization are associated with lymph node metastasis. Oncotarget. 2018;9:7398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Liu Z-M, Wang Y-B, Yuan X-H. Exosomes from murine-derived GL26 cells promote glioblastoma tumor growth by reducing number and function of CD8+ T cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Clayton A, Mitchell JP, Court J, Mason MD, Tabi Z. Human tumor-derived exosomes selectively impair lymphocyte responses to Interleukin-2. Can Res. 2007;67:7458–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Ashiru O, Boutet P, Fernández-Messina L, Agüera-González S, Skepper JN, Valés-Gómez M, Reyburn HT. Natural killer cell cytotoxicity is suppressed by exposure to the human NKG2D ligand MICA*008 that is shed by tumor cells in exosomes. Can Res. 2010;70:481–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Szajnik M, Czystowska M, Szczepanski MJ, Mandapathil M, Whiteside TL. Tumor-derived microvesicles induce, expand and up-regulate biological activities of human regulatory T cells (treg). PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11469.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Yin C, Han Q, Xu D, Zheng B, Zhao X, Zhang J. SALL4-mediated upregulation of exosomal miR-146a-5p drives T-cell exhaustion by M2 tumor-associated macrophages in HCC. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:e1601479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Wang X, Shen H, Zhangyuan G, Huang R, Zhang W, He Q, Jin K, Zhuo H, Zhang Z, Wang J, et al. 14-3-3ζ delivered by hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomes impaired anti-tumor function of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Abusamra AJ, Zhong Z, Zheng X, Li M, Ichim TE, Chin JL, Min W-P. Tumor exosomes expressing Fas ligand mediate CD8+ T-cell apoptosis. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2005;35:169–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Lundholm M, Schröder M, Nagaeva O, Baranov V, Widmark A, Mincheva-Nilsson L, Wikström P. Prostate tumor-derived exosomes down-regulate NKG2D expression on natural killer cells and CD8+ T cells: mechanism of immune evasion. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108925.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Ren W, Zhang X, Li W, Feng Q, Feng H, Tong Y, Rong H, Wang W, Zhang D, Zhang Z. Exosomal miRNA-107 induces myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion in gastric cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019:11:4023–40.

  103. Huber V, Fais S, Iero M, Lugini L, Canese P, Squarcina P, Zaccheddu A, Colone M, Arancia G, Gentile M. Human colorectal cancer cells induce T-cell death through release of proapoptotic microvesicles: role in immune escape. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1796–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Catalano M, O’Driscoll L. Inhibiting extracellular vesicles formation and release: a review of EV inhibitors. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9:1703244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Atanassoff AP, Wolfmeier H, Schoenauer R, Hostettler A, Ring A, Draeger A, Babiychuk EB. Microvesicle shedding and lysosomal repair fulfill divergent cellular needs during the repair of streptolysin O-induced plasmalemmal damage. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89743.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Zhou X, Zhang W, Yao Q, Zhang H, Dong G, Zhang M, Liu Y, Chen J-K, Dong Z. Exosome production and its regulation of EGFR during wound healing in renal tubular cells. Am J Physiol-Renal Physiol. 2017;312:F963–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Jabbari N, Feghhi M, Esnaashari O, Soraya H, Rezaie J. Inhibitory effects of gallic acid on the activity of exosomal secretory pathway in breast cancer cell lines: A possible anticancer impact. BioImpacts BI. 2022;12:549.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Soraya H, Sani NA, Jabbari N, Rezaie J. Metformin increases exosome biogenesis and secretion in U87 MG human glioblastoma cells: a possible mechanism of therapeutic resistance. Arch Med Res. 2021;52:151–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Wang G, Xie L, Li B, Sang W, Yan J, Li J, Tian H, Li W, Zhang Z, Tian Y. A nanounit strategy reverses immune suppression of exosomal PD-L1 and is associated with enhanced ferroptosis. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Ghorbaninezhad F, Alemohammad H, Najafzadeh B, Masoumi J, Shadbad MA, Shahpouri M, Saeedi H, Rahbarfarzam O, Baradaran B. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes: a new horizon in personalized cancer immunotherapy? Cancer Lett. 2023;562:216168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Viaud S, Théry C, Ploix S, Tursz T, Lapierre V, Lantz O, Zitvogel L, Chaput N. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes for cancer immunotherapy: what’s next? Can Res. 2010;70:1281–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Morse MA, Garst J, Osada T, Khan S, Hobeika A, Clay TM, Valente N, Shreeniwas R, Sutton MA, Delcayre A. A phase I study of dexosome immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Transl Med. 2005;3:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Besse B, Charrier M, Lapierre V, Dansin E, Lantz O, Planchard D, Le Chevalier T, Livartoski A, Barlesi F, Laplanche A. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes as maintenance immunotherapy after first line chemotherapy in NSCLC. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1071008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Chen Y, Wang L, Zheng M, Zhu C, Wang G, Xia Y, Blumenthal EJ, Mao W, Wan Y. Engineered extracellular vesicles for concurrent anti-PDL1 immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Bioactive materials. 2022;9:251–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Zhou W, Zhou Y, Chen X, Ning T, Chen H, Guo Q, Zhang Y, Liu P, Zhang Y, Li C. Pancreatic cancer-targeting exosomes for enhancing immunotherapy and reprogramming tumor microenvironment. Biomaterials. 2021;268:120546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Chen H, Jiang S, Zhang P, Ren Z, Wen J. Exosomes synergized with PIONs@E6 enhance their immunity against hepatocellular carcinoma via promoting M1 macrophages polarization. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;99:107960.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Su M-J, Aldawsari H, Amiji M. Pancreatic cancer cell exosome-mediated macrophage reprogramming and the role of MicroRNAs 155 and 125b2 transfection using nanoparticle delivery systems. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Tian T, Liang R, Erel-Akbaba G, Saad L, Obeid PJ, Gao J, Chiocca EA, Weissleder R, Tannous BA. Immune checkpoint inhibition in GBM primed with radiation by engineered extracellular vesicles. ACS Nano. 2022;16:1940–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Ma X, Yao M, Gao Y, Yue Y, Li Y, Zhang T, Nie G, Zhao X, Liang X. Functional immune cell-derived exosomes engineered for the trilogy of radiotherapy sensitization. Advanced Science. 2022;9:2106031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Gunassekaran GR, Poongkavithai Vadevoo SM, Baek M-C, Lee B. M1 macrophage exosomes engineered to foster M1 polarization and target the IL-4 receptor inhibit tumor growth by reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages into M1-like macrophages. Biomaterials. 2021;278: 121137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Manfredi F, Di Bonito P, Ridolfi B, Anticoli S, Arenaccio C, Chiozzini C, Baz Morelli A, Federico M. The CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity induced by HPV-E6 uploaded in engineered exosomes is improved by ISCOMATRIXTM adjuvant. Vaccines. 2016;4:42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Anticoli S, Aricò E, Arenaccio C, Manfredi F, Chiozzini C, Olivetta E, Ferrantelli F, Lattanzi L, D’Urso MT, Proietti E, Federico M. Engineered exosomes emerging from muscle cells break immune tolerance to HER2 in transgenic mice and induce antigen-specific CTLs upon challenge by human dendritic cells. J Mol Med. 2018;96:211–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Cheng Q, Dai Z, Smbatyan G, Epstein AL, Lenz H-J, Zhang Y. Eliciting anti-cancer immunity by genetically engineered multifunctional exosomes. Mol Ther. 2022;30:3066–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Fu W, Lei C, Liu S, Cui Y, Wang C, Qian K, Li T, Shen Y, Fan X, Lin F, et al. CAR exosomes derived from effector CAR-T cells have potent antitumour effects and low toxicity. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4355.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Xie Y, Bai O, Zhang H, Yuan J, Zong S, Chibbar R, Slattery K, Qureshi M, Wei Y, Deng Y, Xiang J. Membrane-bound HSP70-engineered myeloma cell-derived exosomes stimulate more efficient CD8+ CTL- and NK-mediated antitumour immunity than exosomes released from heat-shocked tumour cells expressing cytoplasmic HSP70. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:2655–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Jang Y, Kim H, Yoon S, Lee H, Hwang J, Jung J, Chang JH, Choi J, Kim H. Exosome-based photoacoustic imaging guided photodynamic and immunotherapy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. J Control Release. 2021;330:293–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Xie Y, Bai O, Zhang H, Li W, Xiang J. Tumor necrosis factor gene-engineered J558 tumor cell–released exosomes stimulate tumor antigen P1A-specific CD8+ CTL responses and antitumor immunity. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2010;25:21–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Di Bonito P, Chiozzini C, Arenaccio C, Anticoli S, Manfredi F, Olivetta E, Ferrantelli F, Falcone E, Ruggieri A, Federico M. Antitumor HPV E7-specific CTL activity elicited by in vivo engineered exosomes produced through DNA inoculation. Int J Nanomed. 2017:12:4579–4591.

  129. Hu S, Ma J, Su C, Chen Y, Shu Y, Qi Z, Zhang B, Shi G, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Engineered exosome-like nanovesicles suppress tumor growth by reprogramming tumor microenvironment and promoting tumor ferroptosis. Acta Biomater. 2021;135:567–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Huang L, Rong Y, Tang X, Yi K, Qi P, Hou J, Liu W, He Y, Gao X, Yuan C, Wang F. Engineered exosomes as an in situ DC-primed vaccine to boost antitumor immunity in breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Fan M, Liu H, Yan H, Che R, Jin Y, Yang X, Zhou X, Yang H, Ge K, Liang X-J, et al. A CAR T-inspiring platform based on antibody-engineered exosomes from antigen-feeding dendritic cells for precise solid tumor therapy. Biomaterials. 2022;282:121424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Zuo B, Zhang Y, Zhao K, Wu L, Qi H, Yang R, Gao X, Geng M, Wu Y, Jing R, et al. Universal immunotherapeutic strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma with exosome vaccines that engage adaptive and innate immune responses. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Shi X, Cheng Q, Hou T, Han M, Smbatyan G, Lang JE, Epstein AL, Lenz H-J, Zhang Y. Genetically engineered cell-derived nanoparticles for targeted breast cancer immunotherapy. Mol Ther. 2020;28:536–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Kamerkar S, Leng C, Burenkova O, Jang SC, McCoy C, Zhang K, Dooley K, Kasera S, Zi T, Sisó S, et al. Exosome-mediated genetic reprogramming of tumor-associated macrophages by exoASO-STAT6 leads to potent monotherapy antitumor activity. Science Advances. 2022;8:eabj7002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Wang J, Wang L, Lin Z, Tao L, Chen M. More efficient induction of antitumor T cell immunity by exosomes from CD40L gene-modified lung tumor cells. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9:125–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Figures 2 and 3 have been designed using BioRender Co. online site (https://biorender.com/).

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Mahdi Ahmadi

  2. Department of Biology, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

    Reza Abbasi

  3. Solid Tumor Research Center, Cellular and Molecular Medicine Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

    Jafar Rezaie

Authors
  1. Mahdi Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reza Abbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jafar Rezaie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JR and MA made conceptualization, writing - review and editing. JR made supervision, validation. RA contributed to data collection and Tables editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jafar Rezaie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

None.

Consent for publication

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi, M., Abbasi, R. & Rezaie, J. Tumor immune escape: extracellular vesicles roles and therapeutics application. Cell Commun Signal 22, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01370-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01370-3

Keywords

Cell Communication and Signaling

ISSN: 1478-811X