- Open Access
FGF-9 accelerates epithelial invagination for ectodermal organogenesis in real time bioengineered organ manipulation
© Tai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 14 July 2012
- Accepted: 24 October 2012
- Published: 23 November 2012
Epithelial invagination is important for initiation of ectodermal organogenesis. Although many factors regulate ectodermal organogenesis, there is not any report about their functions in real-time study. Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS), a non-invasive, real-time surveillance system, had been used to detect changes in organ cell layer thickness through quantitative monitoring of the impedance of a cell-to-microelectrode interface over time. It was shown to be a good method for identifying significant real-time changes of cells. The purpose of this study is to establish a combined bioengineered organ-ECIS model for investigating the real time effects of fibroblast growth factor-9 (FGF-9) on epithelial invagination in bioengineered ectodermal organs. We dissected epithelial and mesenchymal cells from stage E14.5 murine molar tooth germs and identified the real-time effects of FGF-9 on epithelial-mesenchymal interactions using this combined bioengineered organ-ECIS model.
Measurement of bioengineered ectodermal organ thickness showed that Fibroblast growth factor-9 (FGF-9) accelerates epithelial invagination in reaggregated mesenchymal cell layer within 3 days. Gene expression analysis revealed that FGF-9 stimulates and sustains early Ameloblastin and Amelogenin expression during odontogenesis.
This is the first real-time study to show that, FGF-9 plays an important role in epithelial invagination and initiates ectodermal organogenesis. Based on these findings, we suggest FGF-9 can be applied for further study in ectodermal organ regeneration, and we also proposed that the ‘FGF-BMP balancing system’ is important for manipulating the morphogenesis of ectodermal organs. The combined bioengineered organ-ECIS model is a promising method for ectodermal organ engineering and regeneration research.
- Epithelial invagination
- Ectodermal organogenesis
- Combined bioengineered organ-ECIS model
- FGF-BMP balancing system
Ectodermal organogenesis involves the development of many ectodermal organs including hair, feathers, scales, teeth, beaks, nails, horns and several eccrine glands. Despite diverse forms and functions, ectodermal organs exhibit common developmental features. Originating from adjacent layers of epithelial (ectodermal) and mesenchymal (mesodermal or neural crest) tissues, the first visible sign of most ectodermal organs is a local epithelial thickening termed an ectodermal placode. Next, a condensation of mesenchymal cells, or papilla, forms under the placode. The ectodermal placode then buds into or out of the papilla in a process called epithelial invagination. Subsequent morphogenesis drives further development of the epithelial and mesenchymal components and is associated with epithelial folding and branching. This ultimately determines the final shape and size of ectodermal organs; however, it is epithelial invagination that regulates when and how ectodermal organs develop, a fact with important implications for future organ engineering and regeneration [for review see ].
Although many factors regulate ectodermal organogenesis, observing their functions in real-time is difficult. The complex developmental progress at different time points involves sophisticated spatial and temporal regulation of growth factor superfamilies including the Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), Fibroblast growth factor (FGF), Tumour necrosis factor (TNF), Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and Wnt superfamilies [for review see [2–4]]. Hence, future study requires a more accurate model. The multipotency of embryonic stem cells makes creation of a non-invasive, non-inductive environment for the observation of specific growth factor functions within ectodermal organ development challenging. Ectodermal organs are greatly affected by their in vivo environment and its inherent regulating factors.
Bioengineered ectodermal organs can be developed from murine molar tooth germs by dissociating the epithelial and mesenchymal layers into single cells, then reaggregating them into a new organ (regenerated tooth germ). Previous studies have shown that these separated cells, once reaggregated and with the correct compartment relationship, can develop into complete, regenerated organs in vitro and in vivo [for review see [5–9]]. This bioengineered organ germ method  could facilitate regeneration of other ectodermal organs, even new engineered organs, which could be transplanted and function normally within humans . However, because of the number of growth factors involved, methods for manipulation of ectodermal organogenesis in vitro and in vivo remain unelucidated.
Many growth factors are expressed during ectodermal organogenesis [12, 13] and it is logical to study their specific roles during organ regeneration. Studies have shown that FGF-8 and FGF-9 are expressed within the murine molar epithelium: FGF-8 has a specific role in multicuspid odontogenesis [13, 14]; therefore, in this study, we investigated the role of FGF-9, also present within the oral epithelium of the first branchial arch at stage E10. FGF-9 expression is restricted to the dental epithelium until epithelial budding at E11. Although not expressed in the mesenchyme, FGF-9 appears in the cap-stage enamel knot of the E13–E15 mouse embryo, spreading within the inner enamel epithelium until E18 . This suggests that FGF-9 is an important factor during the initiation of tooth germ development. However, tissue slicing and staining cannot provide a real-time model for further investigation and, as FGF-9 is critical to embryonic development, a conventional transgenic approach could cause early defects, or even embryonic demise, interfering with in-depth study.
Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) is a non-invasive, real-time surveillance system used to detect changes in organ cell layer thickness through quantitative monitoring of the impedance of a cell-to-microelectrode interface over time . It is a real-time, label-free, impedance-based method to study the activities of cells including morphological changes, locomotion, and other behaviors of cells directed by the cytoskeletons. When cells were added to the ECIS Arrays and attached to the electrodes, they play the roles as insulators and increased the impedance. As cells grow and cover the electrodes, the current is impeded in related with cell number, cell morphology, and cell attachment. When cells are stimulated, cell function and cell morphology will be changed and the impedance of cell-to-microelectrode will be changed. The data generated is impedance versus time. The high frequency impedance is caused by the increasing of cell numbers, whereas the low frequency impedance indicates the increasing of spaces between the cells. Previous study had reported that ECIS can be used to identify significant, real-time changes in organ layers caused by the invasive activities of cultured metastatic cells . Because epithelial invagination is also related to the invasive activities of epithelial cells into mesenchymal cells, which indicated that ECIS would be a good method for detecting epithelial invagination in ectodermal organogenesis. The purpose of this study is to establish a combined bioengineered organ-ECIS model for investigating the real time effects of fibroblast growth factor-9 (FGF-9) on epithelial invagination in bioengineered ectodermal organs.
FGF-9 promotes tooth germ development
In preliminary experiments, we used FGF-9 cultured with the dissociated mesenchymal cells and the dissected lower arches from the E14.5 ICR embryos. Preliminary results showed that FGF-9 can induce early, significant Ameloblastin, Amelogenin and Osteocalcin expression in mesenchymal cells cultured with FGF-9 (Additional file 1). These findings were concurrent with the gene expression of mesenchymal origin cells, such as odontoblasts, during the early stage of tooth development [19, 20]. In addition, FGF-9 can induce early expression of the homeobox protein Msx genes Msx-1 in mesenchymal cells (Additional file 1), which is consistent with previous research . The experimental group also exhibited earlier epithelial differentiation in molar tooth germs at 1 and 10 days in vitro (x 2 and 3). This indicated that the development of tooth germ was promoted by FGF-9, which inspired us to detect the role of FGF-9 in epithelial invagination.
For optimizing the effects of FGF-9 in promoting cell proliferation, cell proliferation rate with different concentrations of FGF-9 were compared by MTT assay. In this assay, yellow MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, a tetrazole) is reduced to purple formazan in the mitochondria of living cells. The absorbance of this colored solution can be quantified by measuring at a certain wavelength (usually between 500 and 600 nm) by a spectrophotometer. The absorption max is dependent on the solvent employed. This reduction takes place only when mitochondrial reductase enzymes are active, and therefore conversion can be directly related to the number of viable (living) cells. The rate of tetrazolium reduction is proportional to the rate of cell proliferation.
MTT data suggested that FGF-9 facilitates early mesenchymal cell proliferation (Figure 3A). MTT data also suggested that FGF-9 can stimulate epithelial cell proliferation at 183 h (Figure 3B). Therefore, we used the ECIS invasion test  to identify the role of FGF-9.
ECIS impedance change reveals FGF-9 stimulates accelerated epithelial invagination
After 72 h (red arrow, Figure 4B), the FGF-9 group exhibited great variation in impedance data (pink line, Figure 4B), suggestive of significantly thinner bioengineered organ layers than that of the control group. According to the MTT data, FGF-9 does not jeopardize tooth germ cell activity (Figure 3). Therefore, accelerated epithelial invagination occurred before this time point. This may explain significant FGF-9 expression in the epithelium  and earlier differentiation of tooth germ we observed in our preliminary in vitro organ culture experiments (Additional file 2 and 3).
Although changing half the medium could have affected impedance data for a short time, each group tended to persist in its own manner (2–4, Figure 4B). After a 163-h observation period, there was no great change in the control group impedance data, which remained stable (black line, Figure 4B). We inferred that the well of the 8W10E kit did not provide enough space for further cell proliferation, making it pointless to continue the ECIS study beyond this time point (5, Figure 4B). The impedance data showed that the bioengineered organ increased in thickness approximately fourfold within 7 days. During this period, electrical resistance increased from <400 Ω to >1400 Ω (Figure 4B). Although well size was limited during organ development, we attempted to improve the culture environment by changing the medium in the last 80 h. No further changes in impedance occurred in either the control or FGF-9 groups after this (Figure 4B), indicating that only epithelial thickening occurred.
FGF-9 accelerates and sustains Ameloblastin and Amelogenin expressions
ECIS data revealed significant electric impedance changes during the 60–84-h period (2–3, Figure 4B). We performed mRNA detection at different time points to determine the factors underlying ectodermal organogenesis. Using the same culture protocol as for previous ECIS surveillance, we examined expression of two genes critical to normal tooth germ development, Ameloblastin and Amelogenin[21, 22]. β-actin served as an internal control for real-time 7900HT PCR.
Trace Amelogenin expression was evident in the FGF-9 group after 1 h (Figure 5B), explaining the early lower impedance of the FGF-9 group. Consequently, early morphological characteristics of ameloblasts occurred, concurring with in vitro organ culture results (Additional file 2). Although Amelogenin expression was very weak, it was higher in the FGF-9 group than in the control group, peaking at 72 h (Figure 5B) following peak Ameloblastin expression at 60 h (Figure 5A) [21, 22]. FGF-9 sustained greater Amelogenin expression than that exhibited by the control group, even after 144 h (Figure 5B). These results provide solid evidence that FGF-9 accelerates epithelial invagination and early phenotypic and morphological characteristics of ameloblast existed within the epithelium.
Because of the multipotency of embryonic stem cells, it is difficult to create a non-invasive and non-inductive environment for observing how a specific growth factor works within ectodermal organ development. Ectodermal organs are always affected by the surrounding in vivo environment and many types of regulating factors, that might be upregulated or downregulated, or work as feedback balancing systems.
We employed a combined bioengineered organ-ECIS model using tooth germ cells (Figure 2), observing their real-time development within a non-invasive, ECIS surveillance system. The method also facilitated assessment of the effect of FGF-9 on epithelial invagination over time (Figure 4B) without tissue slicing or staining .
FGF-9 accelerates epithelial invagination; however, FGF-9 is only expressed in the epithelium, not in the mesenchyme. FGF-9 is known to function in several reciprocal epithelial–mesenchymal interactions: stimulating proliferation of mesenchymal cells (Figure 3A); inducing early mesenchymal expression of the crucial odontogenic genes Msx-1, Ameloblastin and Amelogenin (Additional file 1) ; and accelerating and sustaining early Ameloblastin and Amelogenin secretion within the tooth germ (Figure 5). Thus, FGF-9 may drive early differentiation of the epithelial cell layer to express phenotypic and morphological characteristics of ameloblasts (Additional file 2 and 3), cause proliferation of the epithelium for invagination (Figure 3B) and promote ectodermal organogenesis. This could explain why FGF-9 is restricted to the epithelium and persists there : to initiate epithelial budding. Our findings also suggest that FGF-9 could play an important role in ectodermal organ regeneration and tissue engineering.
MTT data suggested that FGF-9 facilitates early mesenchymal cell proliferation (Figure 3A), possibly also increasing endogenous FGF-10 in mesenchymal cells during proliferation. FGF-10 is known to stimulate proliferation in epithelial cells , potentially creating larger tooth germs. MTT data also suggested that FGF-9 can stimulate epithelial cell proliferation at 183 h (Figure 3B). Resent research indicates that a TGFβ-FGF9-PITX2 signaling cascade regulates cranial neural crest cell proliferation in palatal mesenchyme during palate formation . It seems FGF-9 can regulate the proliferation and integration within mesenchymal cells in a more specific route, which also control the interaction between ectodermal epithelium and mesenchyme. Previous research [5, 25] demonstrated using a bioengineered organ culture system similar to ours that epithelial invagination occurred after 1 week of in vitro culture: if dissociated epithelial cells recombined with intact dissected mesenchymal layers directly, new tooth germs formed faster than that with reaggregated mesenchymal cell layers [5, 25]. Our FGF-9 group exhibited faster mesenchymal cell integration in the first 3–4 days than previous studies (Figure 4B) [5, 6, 25]. These results suggest that FGF-9 functions in assisting mesenchymal cells to closely re-integrated, similar to a tissue layer. This might also explain how FGF-9 accelerates epithelial invagination in murine odontogenesis: by facilitating cross-talk and reunion between mesenchymal cells and stimulating epithelial cell layer differentiation, creating an ameloblast layer. Thus, FGF-9 may play a significant role in future stem cell organ regeneration.
The bioengineered organ-ECIS model provides a novel understanding of FGF-9 function in ectodermal organogenesis and insights into methods of manipulating the speed of ectodermal organ regeneration. These results directly support the role of FGF-9 in epithelial invagination. Ours is the first study to show that FGF-9 is, in addition to BMP-Shh signalling [26–31, 33], a major regulator of epithelial invagination during the initiation of ectodermal organogenesis, with future applications in ectodermal organ regeneration and tissue engineering.
Stage E14.5 pregnant female ICR mice were purchased from BioLASCO Taiwan Co., Ltd. (Taipei, Taiwan). Mouse care and handling procedures, and experimental protocols were approved by the National Taiwan University of Science Animal Care and Use Committee, and conducted in accordance with Directive 86/609/EEC for animal experiments.
First molar tooth germ dissection and dissociation into single cells through the non-serum protocol
Under a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ7.5; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), we microsurgically dissected first molar tooth germs from the mandibular arch of stage E14.5 (equal to cap stage of tooth germ in development) embryos. After soaking the dissected tooth germs in dispase (1.2–1.5 U/ml; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 8–10 min at 4°C, we separated the epithelial and mesenchymal layers using a tungsten needle. The separated layers were stored immediately in 400 μl Spinner modified Ca2+-free minimal essential medium (SMEM; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) at 4°C in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany).
We prepared 5 ml non-serum dissociation medium (Ling et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2009) by adding 0.01 g protease XIV (Sigma) and 0.02 g DNase (Bioshop Canada Inc., Burlington, CA, USA) to 5 ml SMEM and filtering the solution with a 0.22 μm filter (Millex Syringe Filter Unit; EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). We introduced 400 μl filtered non-serum dissociation medium into the stored cell layers. Dissociation proceeded for 12–14 h at 4°C. After gentle pipetting, we centrifuged the mixture twice at 1250 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 5 min (Kubota 2420 Centrifuge; Kubota Corp., Osaka, Japan). Discarding the supernatant, we added 1 ml Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen), mixed and counted cell numbers (Figure 1).
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay
We mixed 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) crystals (Sigma) with 30–40 ml phosphate-buffered saline, creating a 5 mg/ml solution. We filtered this with a 0.22 mm filter (Millipore), covered it with aluminium foil and stored it at 4°C. Next we added 2×104 cells/well epithelial and mesenchymal cells to a 96-well plate. We added 200 μl/well of a range of FGF-9 (PeproTech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) concentrations—10, 25, 40 and 50 ng/ml—to mesenchymal cell cultures. After 1, 4, 7 and 14 days’ incubation (n = 3–4), we removed the medium, added 30 μl/well MTT solution in darkness, then incubated for 3 h at 37°C. We removed the MTT solution, added 50 μl/well dimethyl sulphoxide and agitated for 10–15 min until the purple crystals dissolved. We performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at 570 nm optical density.
After acquisition of mesenchymal cell MTT data, we added 200 μl/well of a range of FGF-9 concentrations—25, 40 and 80 ng/ml-for epithelial cell culture, analysing at 1, 4, 7 and 14 days.
Bioengineered organ culture via electric cell-substrate impedance sensing
Owing to the limited quantity of the primary epithelial and mesenchymal cells, we chose the ECIS Z8 (Applied Biophysics) as an appropriate system to investigate the real time invagination effect of the primary epithelial cells as soon as possible. We added 2×105 mesenchymal cells to each well of the 8W10E ECIS kit (Applied Biophysics). We set the frequency to 15000 Hz, collecting impedance data every 90 seconds. We stopped ECIS after 25 h to allow the mesenchymal cells to settle. We then added 2×105 epithelial cells in 400 μl/well medium to each well, maintaining the FGF-9 concentration of the experimental group at 40 ng/ml. We maintained the control group in 400 μl/well fresh DMEM. We restarted ECIS impedance recording, changing half the medium at 36, 96 and 120 h (Figure 2).
7900HT real-time polymerase chain reaction gene expression assay and statistical analysis
For 7900HT real-time PCR gene expression analysis, we followed the ECIS assay protocol as described previously. We measured Ameloblastin expression at 12, 60, 72, 84 and 150 h and Amelogenin expression at 1, 24, 72 and 144 h. To replicate the ECIS 8W10E kit environment, we used 48-well plates for Ameloblastin and Amelogenin analysis. It was necessary to accommodate this mass and pool data from different time points using the real-time PCR software SDS 2.4 and RQ Manager 1.2.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
We purified RNA collected at different time points using an Rneasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and PureLink® RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen). We converted mRNA to cDNA using a High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Invitrogen) and a T1 Plus Thermocycler (Montreal Biotech Inc., Dorval, PQ, Canada). We used the TaqMan® Gene Expression Assay for Ameloblastin (Mm00711644_g1; Invitrogen), Amelogenin (Mm00477486_m1; Invitrogen) and the internal control β-actin (Mm01205647_g1; Invitrogen) in the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Invitrogen). After TaqMan® Gene Expression Master Mix (Invitrogen), we added the cDNA to the reaction plate and centrifuged the mixture (3500 rpm, 4°C, 5 seconds) to spin down the contents of each well. Then, we performed 7900HT PCR to determine relative gene expressions over time.
We marked at least four samples for each time point from the control and FGF-9 groups. We divided the cDNA from each sample into three wells to determine the expression of each gene in triplicate assay in a 96-well reaction plate. After 7900HT PCR, we pooled the data from SDS 2.4 into RQ Manager 1.2.1 to determine the average relative quantity of each sample, then used a base-10 logarithm to determine gene expressions. Next, we calculated the standard deviation of both groups at each time point and used the paired t- test for statistical analysis. We entered this data into SigmaPlot 10.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) to construct gene expression plots for Ameloblastin and Amelogenin over time.
The authors want to express their thanks to the Graduate Institute of Anatomy, College of Medicine, NTU, for their assistance with microsurgical experiments; Staff of the 2nd, 3rd and 8th Core Lab. of NTUH, Dr. Chia-Cherng Yu, Dr. Pu Ou-Yang, and Dr. Jien-Ting Jen, for ECIS and Real-Time PCR support; the Animal Center of Medical College, NTU; the staff of Qiagen Co., and technical support of Mr. Sen-Wu Wang from ABI, Life Co., Taiwan. We also thank the funding from National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC 97-2314-B-002-102-MY3 NSC 101-2314-B-002-097-MY3) and support from NTUH.
- Pispa J, Thesleff I: Mechanisms of ectodermal organogenesis. Dev Biol. 2003, 262: 195-205. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00325-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Millar SE: Molecular mechanisms regulating hair follicle development. J Invest Dermatol. 2002, 118: 216-225. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01670.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thesleff I, Mikkola ML: The role of growth factors in tooth development. Int Rev Cytol. 2002, 217: 93-135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veltmaat JM, Mailleux AA, Thiery JP, Bellusci S: Mouse embryonic mammogenesis as a model for the molecular regulation of pattern formation. Differentiation. 2003, 71: 1-17. 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.700601.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu B, Nadiri A, Kūchler-Bopp S, Perrin-Schmitt F, Lesot H: Dental epithelial histomorphogenesis in vitro. J Dent Res. 2005, 84: 521-525. 10.1177/154405910508400607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu B, Nadiri A, Kūchler-Bopp S, Perrin-Schmitt F, Peters H, Lesot H: Tissue engineering of tooth crown, root, and periodontium. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12: 2069-2075. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Honda MJ, Tsuchiya S, Sumita Y, Sagara H, Ueda M: The sequential seeding of epithelial and mesenchymal cells for tissue-engineered tooth regeneration. Biomaterials. 2007, 28: 680-689. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakao K, Morita R, Saji Y, Ishida K, Tomita Y, Ogawa M, Saitoh M, Tomooka Y, Tsuji T: The development of a bioengineered organ germ method. Nat Methods. 2007, 4: 227-230. 10.1038/nmeth1012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda E, Morita R, Nakao K, Ishida K, Nakamura T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Ogawa M, Mizuno M, Kasugai S, Tsuji T: Fully functional bioengineered tooth replacement as an organ replacement therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 13475-13480. 10.1073/pnas.0902944106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oshima O, Ogawa M, Yasukawa M, Tsuji T: Generation of a Bioengineered Tooth by Using a Three-Dimensional Cell Manipulation Method (Organ Germ Method). Odontogenesis: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. Volume 887. Edited by: Kioussi C. 2012, New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 149-165.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toyoshima K-e, Asakawa K, Ishibashi N, Toki H, Ogawa M, Hasegawa T, Irié T, Tachikawa T, Sato A, Takeda A, Tsuji T: Fully functional hair follicle regeneration through the rearrangement of stem cells and their niches. Nat Commun. 2012, 17: 1784-1795.Google Scholar
- Thesleff I, Jernvall , Thesleff I: Tooth shape formation and tooth renewal: evolving with the same signals. Development. 2012, 139: 3487-3497. 10.1242/dev.085084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tucker AS, Sharpe PT: The cutting-edge of mammalian development; How the embryo makes teeth. Nat Rev Gen. 2004, 5: 499-508.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kettunen P, Thesleff I: Expression and function of FGFs-4, -8, and −9 suggest functional redundancy and repetitive use as epithelial signals during tooth morphogenesis. Dev Dyn. 1998, 211: 256-268. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199803)211:3<256::AID-AJA7>3.0.CO;2-G.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giaever I, Keese CR: A morphological biosensor for mammalian cells. Nature. 1993, 366 (6455): 591-592. 10.1038/366591a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keese CR, Bhawe K, Wegener J, Giaever I: Real-time impedance assay to follow the invasive activities of metastatic cells in culture. Biotechniques. 2002, 33: 842-844. 846, 848–850PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ling TY, Kuo MD, Li CL, Yu AL, Huang YH, Wu TJ, Lin YC, Chen SH, Yu J: Identification of pulmonary Oct-4+ stem/progenitor cells and demonstration of their susceptibility to SARS-CoV infection in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 9530-9535. 10.1073/pnas.0510232103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang YH, Chin CC, Ho HN, Chou CK, Shen CN, Kuo HC, Wu TJ, Wu YC, Hung YC, Chang CC, Ling TY: Pluripotency of mouse spermatogonial stem cells maintained by IGF-1-dependent pathway. FASEB J. 2009, 23: 2076-2087. 10.1096/fj.08-121939.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spahr A, Lyngstadaas SP, Slaby I, Haller B, Boeckh C, Tsoulfidou F, Hammarström L: Expression of amelin and trauma-induced dentin formation. Clin Oral Invest. 2002, 6: 51-57.Google Scholar
- Fong CD, Cemy R, Hammarstrom L, Salby I: Sequential expression of an amelin gene in mesenchymal and epithelial cells during odontogenesis in rats. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998, 106: 324-330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukumoto S, Yamada A, Nonaka K, Yamada Y: Essential roles of ameloblastin in maintaining ameloblast differentiation and enamel formation. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005, 181: 189-195. 10.1159/000091380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He P, Zhang Y, Kim SO, Radlanski RJ, Butcher K, Schneider RA, DenBesten PK: Ameloblast differentiation in the human developing tooth: Effects of extracellular matrices. Matrix Biol. 2010, 29: 411-419. 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.03.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kettunen P, Laurikkala J, Itaranta P, Vainio S, Itoh N, Thesleff I: Associations of FGF-3 and FGF-10 with signaling networks regulating tooth morphogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2000, 219: 322-332. 10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999<::AID-DVDY1062>3.0.CO;2-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iwata J, Tung L, Urata M, Hacia JG, Pelikan R, Suzuki A, Ramenzoni L, Chaudhry O, Parada C, Sanchez-Lara PA, Chai Y: Fibroblast growth factor 9 (FGF9)-pituitary homeobox 2 (PITX2) pathway mediates transforming growth factor β (TGF β) signaling to regulate cell proliferation in palatal mesenchyme during mouse palatogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287: 2353-2363. 10.1074/jbc.M111.280974.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu B, Nadiri A, Kūchler-Bopp S, Perrin-Schmitt F, Wang S, Lesot H: Dental epithelial histo-morphogenesis in the mouse: positional information versus cell history. Arch Oral Biol. 2005, 50: 131-136. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.09.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarkar L, Cobourne M, Naylor S, Smalley M, Dale T, Sharpe PT: Wnt/Shh interactions regulate ectodermal boundary formation during mammalian tooth development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 4520-4524. 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4520.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu M, Wu P, Widelitz RB, Chuong CM: The morphogenesis of feathers. Nature. 2002, 420: 308-312. 10.1038/nature01196.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris MP, Fallon JF, Prum RO: Shh-Bmp2 signaling module and the evolutionary origin and diversification of feathers. J Exp Zool. 2002, 294: 160-176. 10.1002/jez.10157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munne PM, Tummers M, Järvinen E, Thesleff I, Jernvall J: Tinkering with the inductive mesenchyme: Sostdc1 uncovers the role of dental mesenchyme in limiting tooth induction. Development. 2009, 136: 393-402. 10.1242/dev.025064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bei M, Maas R: FGFs and BMP4 induce both Msx1-independent and Msx1-dependent signaling pathways in early tooth development. Development. 1998, 125: 4325-4333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitsiadis TA, Graf D, Luder H, Gridley T, Bluteau G: BMPs and FGFs target Notch signaling via jagged 2 to regulate tooth morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation. Development. 2010, 137: 3025-3035. 10.1242/dev.049528.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neubüser A, Peters H, Balling R, Martin GR: Antagonistic interactions between FGF and BMP signaling pathways: a mechanism for positioning the sites of tooth formation. Cell. 1997, 90: 247-255. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80333-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kassai Y, Munne P, Hotta Y, Penttila E, Kavanagh K, Ohbayashi N, Takada S, Thesleff I, Jernvall J, Itoh N: Regulation of mammalian tooth cusp patterning by Ectodin. Science. 2005, 309: 2067-2069. 10.1126/science.1116848.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.