Skip to main content
Download PDF

MET fusions are targetable genomic variants in the treatment of advanced malignancies

Cell Communication and Signaling volume 22, Article number: 20 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Targeted therapy for malignancies has developed rapidly in recent years, benefiting patients harboring genetic mutations sensitive to relevant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). With the development of targeted sequencing techniques, an increasing number of detectable genomic alterations in malignancies, including MET fusions, have been revealed. MET fusions, although rare among malignancies, might be functional driver genes that participate in activating downstream signaling pathways and promoting cell proliferation. Therefore, it is believed that MET fusions could be targetable genomic variants of MET, and inhibition of MET is considered an optionable therapeutic choice for patients harboring MET fusions. According to the summary presented in this review, we recommend MET-TKIs as suitable treatment agents for patients harboring primary MET fusions. For patients harboring acquired MET fusions after the development of resistance to TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as sensitive EGFR mutations, treatment with a MET-TKI alone or in combination with TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as EGFR-TKIs, is hypothesized to be a reasonable option for salvage treatment. In summary, MET fusions, despite their low incidence, should be taken into consideration when developing treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Introduction

Currently, the high morbidity and mortality of malignancies result in serious public health problems, especially in China. According to the latest report, the total number of cancer-related deaths in 2014 was 2,205,200 (1,425,700 men and 779,500 women), accounting for 22.40% of all deaths in 2014 in China [1]. Given this critical situation, various therapeutic approaches, especially targeted therapies for patients harboring sensitive genomic alterations, have developed rapidly in the past decade. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the best representatives of targeted therapeutic agents, and they provide more opportunities for therapeutic success and benefit cancer patients. For instance, TKIs targeting sensitive mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as gefitinib, erlotinib and osimertinib, prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with acceptable adverse events during treatment [2]. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement is a well-known genomic mutation that can be effectively treated with targeted therapy. Patients with NSCLC who have this ALK rearrangement display significant responsiveness to specific inhibitors, such as crizotinib and alectinib [3].. Inhibitors targeting gene fusions involving neurotrophin receptor kinase (NTRK) have demonstrated efficacy in several cancer types, including NSCLC [4]. With the development of molecular detection techniques and the increase in the detection depth of targeted sequencing, an increasing number of novel genomic alterations have become detectable and targetable in anticancer treatment.

A series of studies revealed solid tumors with oncogenic addiction to MET alterations and elucidated the efficacy of MET-TKIs in the treatment of patients harboring sensitive MET alterations. The MET gene is located on chromosome 7 and encodes the MET protein. The MET protein was demonstrated to be the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), which participates in the biological regulation of cell proliferation [5]. In addition, MET alterations are suggested to be one of the major uncommon oncogenic alterations in NSCLC [5], and the latest research identified the important role of MET amplification in accelerating the growth of tumors and predicting the poor prognosis of patients with malignancies [6, 7]. MET amplification and other oncogenic mutations, such as MET exon 14 skipping mutations, can activate signal transduction in carcinogenic pathways belonging to MET signaling [8]. According to the results of clinical trials for patients harboring these MET alterations, MET-TKIs are believed to be an efficient and safe choice for these patients. Capmatinib and tepotinib, which benefit patients with metastatic NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutations, were the first two MET-TKIs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [9]. Moreover, the anticancer efficacy of savolitinib, another MET-TKI, for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations was confirmed in a phase 2 study [10]. Crizotinib, which targets ALK, ROS1 and MET, could also constitute a treatment option for patients harboring sensitive MET alterations.

MET fusions were reported in recent studies as novel detectable alterations of MET, although the incidence of MET fusions is low [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. It is likely that patients harboring MET fusions might respond to specific treatments, such as crizotinib, as reported; however, the demographic characteristics and treatment data have not been well reported. In this review, we determine the incidence rates of MET fusions and the demographic characteristics of the affected patients through online databases and published studies. In addition, we summarize the cellular oncogenic functions of MET fusions based on previous studies. We also include reported cancer patients harboring primary or acquired MET fusions to understand the potential treatment options for these patients. Our findings suggest that MET fusions, despite their low incidence, should be considered when developing treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Identification of MET fusions in malignancies: incidence rates, demographic characteristics and cellular oncogenic functions

Even though genetic changes in the MET gene are quite prevalent in certain types of tumors, particularly in melanoma and NSCLC, where more than 5% of patients have MET gene alterations [18], the incidence of MET fusions is still low in all cancer types. According to the latest studies, less than 1.1% of patients harbor MET fusions [18,19,20]. The incidence of MET fusions was the highest in brain cancer, in which it was detected in approximately 1.10% of patients, followed by bile duct cancer (0.52% of patients), lung cancer (0.07–0.30% of patients), gastric cancer (0.25% of patients) and intestinal cancer (0.14% of patients). Fewer than 0.10% of patients with other cancer types harbor MET fusions, according to published studies.

To further explore the incidence rates of MET fusions in a larger sample of patients, we used the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics database [21, 22] and analyzed the results. In total, 75,661 patients with different cancer types in 10 pancancer studies were included in our analysis, and the incidence of MET fusions increased with increasing sample size in each type of cancer. The results showed that 6.50% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients, 0–2.00% of renal cell carcinoma patients, 1.39% of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients, 0.64–1.06% of NSCLC patients, 1.01% of hepatocellular carcinoma patients, 0.23% of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, 0.23% of hepatobiliary cancer patients, 0.22% of esophagogastric cancer patients, 0.21% of ovarian cancer patients, 0.19% of endometrial cancer patients, 0.15% of soft tissue sarcoma patients, 0.15% of glioma patients and 0.15% of thyroid cancer patients harbored detectable MET fusions as shown in Fig. 1A. The prevalence of MET fusions may be relatively low, but considering the large number of cancer patients, there is still a substantial population at risk. Hence, it is still meaningful to outline the traits of patients with MET fusions and to offer treatment choices for these individuals. Additionally, it is noteworthy that gene fusion detection is technically challenging. The use of various genomic examination methods in different datasets might cause inaccurate analysis based on current open-access data.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The prevalence and molecular characteristics of MET fusions in malignant tumors. A) Incidences of MET fusions in malignancies; only structural variant data were involved during the searching process, and only fusions were found in the MET structural variant data; B) the incidences of MET fusions in different studies; C) the comutated genes detected with MET fusions in malignancies; cytoband: cytogenetic bands; co-occurrence pattern: upper row refers to samples colored according to group, and lower row refers to samples with an alteration in the listed gene; D) the tumor mutation burden between patients with MET fusions or wild type of MET gene

Full size image

According to the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics database, less than 1% (92/75661) of patients harbor detectable MET fusions. However, whether there are differences between races is unclear. As shown in Fig. 1B, Asian patients (China Pan-Cancer, OrigiMed, Nature 2022) had the highest incidence of MET fusions, at approximately 1.05%, which was much higher than the second highest incidence (MSK MetTropism, MSK, Cell 2021, incidence of MET fusions: 0.22%). To the best of our knowledge, only two Chinese studies [18, 19] have reported the demographic characteristics of lung cancer patients harboring MET fusions. These studies demonstrated that the age of patients was not a specific factor that influenced the fusion of genes and that patients between 27 and 83 years old harbored detectable MET fusions. The two studies noted that most of the lung cancer patients (89.3–92.3%) harboring MET fusions were diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the smoking history of patients was not clearly related to MET fusions, according to the two studies. In this review, we summarize the reported demographic characteristics of cancer patients harboring MET fusions. The selection criteria for this review is as follows: 1. Patient population: patients with malignant tumors identified as carrying MET fusion in reviews, case reports, or studies; 2. Intervention measures: inclusion of patients without restriction on the type of treatment, but with a focus on collecting data on those who have undergone MET-TKI treatment; 3. Search terms: MET, MET fusion, MET fusions, MET mutations, and MET alterations in PubMed; Period of search: August 2023 to September 2023. As concluded from the studies [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32] listed in Table 1, the average age of patients diagnosed with malignancies harboring MET fusions was 56.6 years, with a range of 27 to 74 years. Among these patients, 60% patients were female, and the MET fusion incidence showed no significant sex difference.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics and clinical information of patients harboring MET fusions
Full size table

As described in the introduction section, wild-type MET protein serves as the receptor for HGF and can be activated (phosphorylated) by stimulation with HGF. Multiple research studies have concentrated their efforts on investigating the impact of the MET fusion protein, a variant protein, on the cellular function of MET [19, 33,34,35,36,37]. The results suggested that MET fusions, such as PTPRZ1–MET in glioma and glioblastoma cells or KIF5B-MET and EPHB4-MET in lung cancer cells, can upregulate the expression and enhance the phosphorylation of the MET protein, even without HGF stimulation. In certain instances, particularly with PTPRZ1-MET fusions, the point where the MET gene is disrupted occurs before the start codon, as happens in the partner gene. As a result, the resulting protein from these fusions would likely be the complete MET protein, but now regulated by a potentially more active promoter [38]. The abnormally constitutively phosphorylated MET protein can then activate downstream signaling pathways, including the MAPK pathway, Akt pathway and STAT3 pathway, events characterized by the upregulated phosphorylation of ERK1/2, Akt and STAT3, respectively. The latter three pathways were all believed to be associated with tumor proliferation and apoptosis escape, and these hypotheses were verified in the listed studies [34, 35] through in vitro and in vivo experiments. Thus, these aberrant fusions of the MET gene act as a “driver” for the activation of the MET protein and downstream signaling pathways, endowing tumor cells with HGF-independent self-activation ability. Fortunately, current preclinical evidence in the listed studies suggested that tumor cells harboring MET fusions showed sensitivity to treatment with MET-TKIs, such as crizotinib, tepotinib, SGX523 and foretinib, indicating the basis for treatment methods for patients harboring MET fusions. Most importantly, MET fusions enable tumor cells to abolish their dependency on the ligand HGF and participate in the autophosphorylation of components in oncogenic cellular pathways. The oncogenic function of MET fusions makes them therapeutic targets for cancers.

The molecular landscape of human genomes harboring MET fusions: detection methods, fusion partners, and comutated genes

As shown in Table 1, the next-generation sequencing (NGS) method was used for MET fusion detection in all reported patients, but the detection panels varied among patients. Both DNA-based and RNA-based NGS are considered optionable methods. RNA-based NGS sequencing is believed to be more sensitive and could widen the map of druggable targets, although it requires high sample quality [38]. The conventional samples used for NGS examination were all suitable for MET fusion detection. Most samples used for NGS were formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples (41/74, 55.4%). In addition, other types of samples, such as plasma (9/74, 12.2%), fresh tissues (3/74, 4.1%) and pleural effusions (3/74 4.1%), could all be used for MET fusion detection according to the cases in Table 1.

Regarding the types of MET gene fusion, in this review, we determined the incidence of each type of MET fusion and found that KIF5B-MET (8/74, 10.8%), HLA-DRB1-MET (8/74, 10.8%), CAPZA2-MET (6/74, 8.1%) and CD47-MET (6/74, 8.1%) were the four most common mutation types, followed by EPHB4-MET (4/74, 5.4%), ST7-MET (3/74, 4.1%), CAV1-MET (2/74, 2.7%), CD74-MET (2/74, 2.7%) and MET-DST (2/74, 2.7%). Other types of MET fusion, such as MET-ADAP1, ARL1-MET, MET-ATXN7L1, CCDC6-MET, CFTR-MET, COG5-MET, CTNNA3-MET, MET-CTTNBP2, CUX1-MET, MET-DOCK4, MET-DSTN, ECT2-MET, EHBP1-MET, EML4-MET, MET-EPHA1, ETV6-MET, MET-FOXP2, MET-GJC2, MET-HLA-DRB5, KCND2-MET, MET-LINC01392, LRIG3-MET, PRKAR1A-MET, STARD3NL-MET, MET-STEAP4, TFEC-MET, PRKAR2B-MET, TRIM4-MET, THAP5-MET, TNPO3-MET, MET-UBE2H, WEE2-AS1-MET, WNT2-MET and LINC01392-MET, are found in sporadic cases, and each type was detected in only one patient (1/74, 1.4%). Compared with the concomitant MET exon 14 skipping mutation (2/60, 3.3%) among the included patients, concomitant MET amplification (16/69, 23.2%) seemed to be more strongly related to MET fusions, consistent with the results of in vitro experiments in previous research [19]. The genes encoding MET fusion partners are distributed on various chromosomes, but most of them are located on the same chromosome as the MET gene [18].

We then explored the comutation patterns of patients harboring MET fusions in the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics database as shown in Fig. 1C; a total of 16 genes, namely, EGFR, MDM2, RBM10, CDK4, GLI1, PIK3C2G, EPHA7, DOT1L, CAPZA2, LRP1B, CDK6, MYCL, PNRC1, EPHA2, NRG3 and COMETT, were found to have statistically significant (P < 0.05) comutation rates with MET fusions. In a particular research work [19], scientists also documented the mutation features found in patients with MET fusions. The proposal included the co-mutation of CDK6 and RBM10 with MET fusions, a finding that was also affirmed in the recent review. However, the underlying connections between the mutations and the functional changes in the proteins encoded by these genes remain to be further elucidated.

Treatment for patients harboring MET fusions: therapeutic options and efficacy of MET-TKIs

According to previous studies and reported cases, as shown in Table 1, we found that multiple MET-TKIs were proven to be effective in patients harboring MET fusions. Seven kinds of MET-TKIs, including crizotinib, cabozantinib, tepotinib, capmatinib, savolitinib, PLB-1001 (bozitinib) and ensartinib, were reported in the treatment of patients harboring MET fusions. The best therapeutic response status was also considered in this review.

Crizotinib was reported in the treatment of 22 patients with MET fusions: as first-line treatment in 8 patients and as postfirst-line treatment in 14 patients. Crizotinib demonstrated dramatic efficacy in patients harboring MET fusions, as listed in Table 1. Four patients who received cabozantinib were reported. However, only 1 patient received first-line cabozantinib treatment, and PFS was not reached (NR) as reported. Four patients had received tepotinib treatment, with one of them experiencing a complete response (CR), two showing a partial response (PR), and one having progressive disease (PD) as the best response. The remaining 3 patients received post first-line cabozantinib treatment; one of them showed a PR to the treatment. Another 3 patients who received capmatinib were reported, and all three patients achieved PR. Fewer than three patients each received treatment with tepotinib, savolitinib, PLB-1001 (bozitinib) and ensartinib.

As summarized earlier in this review, aberrant fusions of MET can enhance the expression and lead to abnormal activation of the MET protein, indicating that MET-TKIs have the potential ability to inhibit activated MET proteins and the downstream signaling pathways induced by these MET fusions. The evidence for crizotinib in the treatment of patients harboring MET fusions is currently extensive; the efficacy of crizotinib is satisfactory, and the safety is tolerable. Patients harboring a series of MET fusion types, including CAV1-MET, EHBP1-MET, ARL1-MET, CUX1-MET, MET-DSTN, CD47-MET, HLA-DRB1-MET, STARD3NL-MET, MET-ATXN7L1, MET-UBE2H, EPHB4-MET and CCDC6-MET, responded well to crizotinib treatment. Patients harboring these types of MET fusions achieved PRs and even CRs. Patients harboring CD74-MET and KIF5B-MET demonstrated different responses to crizotinib treatment, as listed in Table 1. One patient harboring TNPO3-MET did not benefit from crizotinib treatment, even as the first-line treatment. For patients harboring CD47-MET and HLA-DRB1- MET, the efficacy of MET-TKIs seems to be certain, and all patients showed a response to MET-TKI treatment. However, the efficacy of different MET-TKIs in patients harboring MET fusions must be further verified, given that the incidence of MET fusions is too low to draw any robust conclusions. However, we still recommend crizotinib as a potentially suitable choice for patients harboring MET fusions, regardless of the treatment line. It is worth noting that the clinical results of MET fusion-positive patients treated with MET-TKIs were aggregated from case reports and retrospective research. In addition, the mechanisms behind the response to MET-TKIs in patients with MET fusions are still not well understood. If the kinase domain of MET was not included in the fusion protein, these patients harboring related fusion genes naturally had no response to MET-TKI treatment. The functions of MET fusions with distinctive fusion partners or fusion sites and their sensitivity to targeted drugs require further research.

Characteristics and clinical importance of primary and acquired MET fusions in malignancies

According to published studies in related fields, it is believed that abnormal expression or activation of the MET protein is tightly associated with the development of TKI resistance. The promotion of MET expression serves as the major bypass mechanism involved in resistance to EGFR-TKIs [39]. Abnormal MET protein expression could not only activate the classical downstream MAPK pathway, Akt pathway and STAT3 pathway, all of which participate in the inhibition of apoptosis induced by TKIs as concluded above, but also activate the MET/MYC/AXL axis and enhance resistance [40,41,42]. Given the critical role of acquired abnormal MET function in inducing resistance to TKIs, a previous study also shed new light on strategies for combination therapy, including therapies combining relevant TKIs and MET inhibitors (MET-TKIs), in improving the prognosis of patients [32, 43]. As we summarized above, aberrant fusion of the MET gene could act as a trigger for the upregulation and activation of MET. Thus, mechanistically, MET inhibition could be an underlying method for salvage therapy for patients harboring MET fusions.

In this review, a total of 39 patients with primary MET fusions detected and 9 patients (4 of whom had detailed treatment information) with acquired MET fusions detected were included as shown in Table 1. According to the summary of the 4 patients harboring acquired MET fusions, we found that treatment with a MET-TKI alone or in combination with TKIs relevant to the primary targets, such as the EGFR-sensitive mutations in these patients, achieved promising efficacy in these patients after the development of resistance to TKIs relevant to the primary targets. Seventy-five percent of these 4 patients (3/4) achieved a PR after treatment, and 1 patient achieved a CR. The median PFS time of patients treated with the combination of MET-TKIs plus EGFR-TKIs was NR by the time of publication of these reports. Importantly, 2 of the patients harboring acquired MET fusions were administered crizotinib plus EGFR-TKIs (icotinib or gefitinib) as fourth-line treatment but still exhibited dramatic responses to the treatment and achieved a PR and even a CR. Therefore, combination therapy is supposed to be an efficient salvage treatment for patients who develop resistance to TKIs relevant to the primary targets. The latest study [18] compared the genes encoding MET partners for primary and acquired MET fusions, and the findings suggested a significant difference in the functional enrichment of the genes between the two groups. Interestingly, MET fusions correlated with a lower tumor mutation burden as illustrated in Fig. 1D.

Conclusion

MET fusions could be targetable genomic variants of MET, and inhibition of MET is considered the baseline therapeutic choice for patients harboring MET fusions. According to the summary presented in this review, we recommend MET-TKIs, especially crizotinib, as suitable agents for the treatment of patients harboring primary MET fusions. For patients harboring acquired MET fusions after the development of resistance to TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as sensitive EGFR mutations, treatment with a MET-TKI alone or in combination with TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as EGFR-TKIs, is hypothesized to be a reasonable option for salvage treatment. In summary, MET fusions, despite their low incidence, should be taken into consideration when developing treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Availability of data and materials

All data and material from this study are available.

Abbreviations

TKIs:

tyrosine kinase inhibitors

EGFR:

epidermal growth factor receptor

PFS:

progression-free survival

OS:

overall survival

NSCLC:

non-small cell lung cancer

ALK:

anaplastic lymphoma kinase

NTRK:

neurotrophin receptor kinase

HGF:

hepatocyte growth factor

LUAD:

lung adenocarcinoma

NGS:

next-generation sequencing

FFPE:

formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded

PR:

partial response

CR:

complete response

NR:

not reached

PD:

progressive disease

References

  1. Hou H, Sun D, Zhang X. The role of MDM2 amplification and overexpression in therapeutic resistance of malignant tumors. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, Zhang L, You C. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:735–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koivunen JP, Mermel C, Zejnullahu K, Murphy C, Lifshits E, Holmes AJ, Choi HG, Kim J, Chiang D, Thomas R, Lee J, Richards WG, Sugarbaker DJ, Ducko C, Lindeman N, Marcoux JP, Engelman JA, Gray NS, Lee C, Meyerson M, Jänne PA. EML4-ALK fusion gene and efficacy of an ALK kinase inhibitor in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4275–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang T, Wang G, Liu Y, Feng L, Wang M, Liu J, Chen Y, Ouyang L. Development of small-molecule tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors for NTRK fusion cancers. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(2):355–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tong JH, Yeung SF, Chan AW, Chung LY, Chau SL, Lung RW, Tong CY, Chow C, Tin EK, Yu YH, Li H, Pan Y, Chak WP, Ng CS, Mok TS, To KF. MET amplification and exon 14 splice site mutation define unique molecular subgroups of non-small cell lung carcinoma with poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(12):3048–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lutterbach B, Zeng Q, Davis LJ, Hatch H, Hang G, Kohl NE, Gibbs JB, Pan BS. Lung cancer cell lines harboring MET gene amplification are dependent on met for growth and survival. Cancer Res. 2007;67(5):2081–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman N, Hong L, Zhang J, Heymach J, Hong D, Le X. Beyond epidermal growth factor receptor: MET amplification as a general resistance driver to targeted therapy in oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer. ESMO Open. 2021;6(6):100319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E, Vande Woude GF. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4(12):915–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathieu LN, Larkins E, Akinboro O, Roy P, Amatya AK, Fiero MH, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Helms WS, Myers CE, Skinner AM, Aungst S, Jin R, Zhao H, Xia H, Zirkelbach JF, Bi Y, Li Y, Liu J, Grimstein M, Zhang X, Woods S, Reece K, Abukhdeir AM, Ghosh S, Philip R, Tang S, Goldberg KB, Pazdur R, Beaver JA, Singh H. FDA approval summary: capmatinib and tepotinib for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations or alterations. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(2):249–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu S, Fang J, Li X, Cao L, Zhou J, Guo Q, Liang Z, Cheng Y, Jiang L, Yang N, Han Z, Shi J, Chen Y, Xu H, Zhang H, Chen G, Ma R, Sun S, Fan Y, Li J, Luo X, Wang L, Ren Y, Su W. Once-daily savolitinib in Chinese patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas and other non-small-cell lung cancers harbouring MET exon 14 skipping alterations: a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(10):1154–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho JH, Ku BM, Sun JM, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Park K, Ahn MJ. KIF5B-MET gene rearrangement with robust antitumor activity in response to crizotinib in lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(3):e29–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu J, Li X, Peng J. A novel CAV1-MET fusion in SCLC transformation responds to crizotinib and osimertinib treatment. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14(6):e126–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ou L, Tang Y, Deng Y, Guo L, He Q, He T, Feng W. Case report: durable partial response to icotinib plus crizotinib in a lung adenocarcinoma patient with double uncommon EGFR G719D/L861Q mutations and an acquired novel CUX1-MET fusion. Front Oncol. 2022;12:911362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma Q, Kong L, Zhong D. Case report: dramatic response to crizotinib in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer positive for a novel ARL1-MET fusion. Front Oncol. 2022;12:804330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu LF, Deng JY, Lizaso A, Lin J, Sun S. Effective response to crizotinib of concurrent KIF5B-MET and MET-CDR2-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: a case report. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(8):2529–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Blanc-Durand F, Alameddine R, Iafrate AJ, Tran-Thanh D, Lo YC, Blais N, Routy B, Tehfé M, Leduc C, Romeo P, Stephenson P, Florescu M. Tepotinib efficacy in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis harboring an HLA-DRB1-MET gene fusion. Oncologist. 2020;25(11):916–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Wang K, Tian P, Li W. Acquired MET-DSTN fusion mediated resistance to EGFR-TKIs in lung adenocarcinoma and responded to crizotinib plus gefitinib: a case report. Clin Lung Cancer. 2022;23(1):e83–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun D, Wu W, Wang L, Qu J, Han Q, Wang H, Song S, Liu N, Wang Y, Hou H. Identification of MET fusions as novel therapeutic targets sensitive to MET inhibitors in lung cancer. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang J, Deng QM, Feng W, Chen ZH, Su JW, Chen HJ, Wang WX, Zhang S, Wang Q, Chen Z, Zhong WZ, Xu CW, Yang JJ. Response and acquired resistance to MET inhibitors in de novo MET fusion-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2023;178:66–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang W, Zhao X, Zheng A, Liu Z, Ma J, Zhang X, Li W, Wang D, Zhu J, Tao H, Zhang Y, Ma T, Liu Q. Identification of MET fusions in solid tumors: a multicenter, large scale study in China. Int J Cancer. 2023;152(6):1259–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, Sun Y, Jacobsen A, Sinha R, Larsson E, Cerami E, Sander C, Schultz N. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6(269):pl1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, Jacobsen A, Byrne CJ, Heuer ML, Larsson E, Antipin Y, Reva B, Goldberg AP, Sander C, Schultz N. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(5):401–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu J, Shen L, Qian Y, Liu Y, Su M, Yi L. Durable response to crizotinib in an advanced lung adenocarcinoma patient harboring rare CD47-MET fusion: a case report. Transl Cancer Res. 2022;11(8):2931–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang Y, Zhang Y, Zhao D, Li X, Ma T. A novel PRKAR1A::MET fusion dramatic response to crizotinib in a patient with unresectable lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2023;24(1):e50–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin CY, Wei SH, Chen YL, Lee CT, Wu SY, Ho CL, Pavlick DC, Su PL, Lin CC. Case report: salvage capmatinib therapy in KIF5B-MET fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma with resistance to telisotuzumab vedotin. Front Oncol. 2022;12:919123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Turpin A, Descarpentries C, Grégoire V, Farchi O, Cortot AB, Jamme P. Response to capmatinib in a MET fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma. Oncologist. 2023;28(1):80–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu Y, Liu Q, Li W, Qu Y, Zhang Y, Liu T. Identification of a novel EHBP1-MET fusion in an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma responding to crizotinib. Oncologist. 2020;25(12):1005–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu ZW, Sha Y, Chen Q, Hou J, Sun Y, Lu WK, Chen J, Yu LJ. Novel intergenic KIF5B-MET fusion variant in a patient with gastric cancer: a case report. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(14):3350–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rooper LM, Karantanos T, Ning Y, Bishop JA, Gordon SW, Kang H. Salivary secretory carcinoma with a novel ETV6-MET fusion: expanding the molecular spectrum of a recently described entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(8):1121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Riedel R, Fassunke J, Scheel AH, Scheffler M, Heydt C, Nogova L, Michels S, Fischer RN, Eisert A, Scharpenseel H, John F, Ruge L, Schaufler D, Siemanowski J, Ihle MA, Wagener-Ryczek S, Pappesch R, Rehker J, Bunck A, Kobe C, Keil F, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Büttner R, Wolf J. MET fusions in NSCLC: Clinicopathologic features and response to MET inhibition. J Thorac Oncol. 2023;S1556-0864(23):00666–4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Davies KD, Ng TL, Estrada-Bernal A, Le AT, Ennever PR, Camidge DR, Doebele RC, Aisner DL. Dramatic response to crizotinib in a patient with lung cancer positive for an HLA-DRB1-MET gene fusion. JCO precis. Oncol. 2017;1:PO.17.00117.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xia H, Zhang J, Chen T, Wang M, Chen D, Si T, Liu Y. Molecular characterization of MET fusions from a large real-world Chinese population: a multicenter study. Cancer Med. 2023;12(13):14015–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bao ZS, Chen HM, Yang MY, Zhang CB, Yu K, Ye WL, Hu BQ, Yan W, Zhang W, Akers J, Ramakrishnan V, Li J, Carter B, Liu YW, Hu HM, Wang Z, Li MY, Yao K, Qiu XG, Kang CS, You YP, Fan XL, Song WS, Li RQ, Su XD, Chen CC, Jiang T. RNA-seq of 272 gliomas revealed a novel, recurrent PTPRZ1-MET fusion transcript in secondary glioblastomas. Genome Res. 2014;24(11):1765–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. International Cancer Genome Consortium PedBrain Tumor Project. Recurrent MET fusion genes represent a drug target in pediatric glioblastoma. Nat Med. 2016;22(11):1314–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gow CH, Liu YN, Li HY, Hsieh MS, Chang SH, Luo SC, Tsai TH, Chen PL, Tsai MF, Shih JY. Oncogenic function of a KIF5B-MET fusion variant in non-small cell lung cancer. Neoplasia. 2018;20(8):838–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen HM, Yu K, Tang XY, Bao ZS, Jiang T, Fan XL, Chen XW, Su XD. Enhanced expression and phosphorylation of the MET oncoprotein by glioma-specific PTPRZ1-MET fusions. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(13):1437–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Plenker D, Bertrand M, de Langen AJ, Riedel R, Lorenz C, Scheel AH, Müller J, Brägelmann J, Daßler-Plenker J, Kobe C, Persigehl T, Kluge A, Wurdinger T, Schellen P, Hartmann G, Zacherle T, Menon R, Thunnissen E, Büttner R, Griesinger F, Wolf J, Heukamp L, Sos ML, Heuckmann JM. Structural alterations of MET trigger response to MET kinase inhibition in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(6):1337–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hu H, Mu Q, Bao Z, Chen Y, Liu Y, Chen J, Wang K, Wang Z, Nam Y, Jiang B, Sa JK, Cho HJ, Her NG, Zhang C, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Zeng F, Wu F, Kang X, Liu Y, Qian Z, Wang Z, Huang R, Wang Q, Zhang W, Qiu X, Li W, Nam DH, Fan X, Wang J, Jiang T. Mutational landscape of secondary glioblastoma guides MET-targeted trial in brain tumor. Cell. 2018;175(6):1665–78. e18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pal AS, Agredo A, Lanman NA, Son J, Sohal IS, Bains M, Li C, Clingerman J, Gates K, Kasinski AL. Loss of KMT5C promotes EGFR inhibitor resistance in NSCLC via LINC01510-mediated upregulation of MET. Cancer Res. 2022;82(8):1534–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lei T, Xu T, Zhang N, Zou X, Kong Z, Wei C, Wang Z. Anlotinib combined with osimertinib reverses acquired osimertinib resistance in NSCLC by targeting the c-MET/MYC/AXL axis. Pharmacol Res. 2023;188:106668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Peters TL, Patil T, Le AT, Davies KD, Brzeskiewicz PM, Nijmeh H, Bao L, Camidge DR, Aisner DL, Doebele RC. Evolution of MET and NRAS gene amplification as acquired resistance mechanisms in EGFR mutant NSCLC. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2021;5(1):91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Li Y, Wang B, Wang C, Zhao D, Liu Z, Niu Y, Wang X, Li W, Zhu J, Tao H, Ma T, Li T. Genomic and transcriptional profiling of Chinese melanoma patients enhanced potentially druggable targets: a multicenter study. Cancers (Basel). 2022;15(1):283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hartmaier RJ, Markovets AA, Ahn MJ, Sequist LV, Han JY, Cho BC, Yu HA, Kim SW, Yang JC, Lee JS, Su WC, Kowalski DM, Orlov S, Ren S, Frewer P, Ou X, Cross DAE, Kurian N, Cantarini M, Jänne PA. Osimertinib + savolitinib to overcome acquired MET-mediated resistance in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated, MET-amplified non-small cell lung cancer: TATTON. Cancer Discov. 2023;13(1):98–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Special Funding for Qilu Sanitation and Health Leading Talents Cultivation Project (to Helei Hou).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China

    Dantong Sun

  2. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China

    Dantong Sun

  3. Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China

    Xiaoming Xing

  4. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliation Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China

    Yongjie Wang

  5. Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 7 Jiaxing Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China

    Helei Hou

Authors
  1. Dantong Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoming Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yongjie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Helei Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception/Design: Helei Hou. Data collection and/or assembly: Dantong Sun. Data analysis and interpretation. Dantong Sun, Xiaoming Xing, Yongjie Wang and Helei Hou. Manuscript writing: Dantong Sun and Helei Hou. Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helei Hou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, D., Xing, X., Wang, Y. et al. MET fusions are targetable genomic variants in the treatment of advanced malignancies. Cell Commun Signal 22, 20 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01454-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01454-0

Keywords

Cell Communication and Signaling

ISSN: 1478-811X