Skip to main content

On the role of bacterial metalloproteases in COVID-19 associated cytokine storm

Abstract

The cytokine release syndrome or cytokine storm, which is the hyper-induction of inflammatory responses has a central role in the mortality rate of COVID-19 and some other viral infections. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a key player in the development of cytokine storms. Shedding of interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6Rα) results in the accumulation of soluble interleukin-6 receptors (sIL-6R). Only relatively few cells express membrane-bound IL-6Rα. However, sIL-6R can act on potentially all cells and organs through the ubiquitously expressed gp130, the coreceptor of IL-6Rα. Through this, so-called trans-signaling, IL-6–sIL-6R is a powerful factor in the development of cytokine storms and multiorgan involvement. Some bacteria (e.g., Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Listeria monocytogenes), commonly considered to cause co-infections during viral pneumonia, can directly induce the shedding of membrane receptors, including IL-6Rα, or enhance endogenous shedding mechanisms causing the increase of sIL-6R level. Here we hypothesise that bacteria promoting shedding and increase the sIL-6R level can be an important contributing factor for the development of cytokine storms. Therefore, inhibition of IL-6Rα shedding by drastically reducing the number of relevant bacteria may be a critical element in reducing the chance of a cytokine storm. Validation of this hypothesis can support the consideration of the prophylactic use of antibiotics more widely and at an earlier stage of infection to decrease the mortality rate of COVID-19.

Video abstract

Background

As of 16 October 2020 the worldwide mortality rate of COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus is approximately 2.5% (49,727,316 confirmed cases, 1,248,373 deaths), but in specific countries, the current mortality rate can be much higher, e.g., Italy 4.5%, UK 4.2% [1]. The possibility that cytokine release syndrome or cytokine storm stands behind the severe cases of COVID-19 has been raised by several research groups [2,3,4,5,6]. Cytokine storm is a hyperreaction of the immune system, driven by a sudden increase in interleukin levels [7] often due to a sudden increase in viral load [8]. The cytokine storm has also been described previously for several infections e.g., H1N1 [9,10,11], H5N1 [12] influenza, MERS-CoV [13] and SARS-CoV [14] and we recently analysed the key cytokines involved in these infections [15].

One of the central protein molecules in the cytokine storm is interleukin-6 (IL-6). Monocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and activated Th2 cells produce IL-6 [16]. Viral infection induces IL-6 production through TNF-α [17,18,19].

IL-6 acts on the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R). IL-6R is a protein expressed primarily in hepatocytes, megakaryocytes, and leukocytes [20, 21]. The IL-6R cell surface receptor complex consists of an 80 kDa IL-6 binding subunit, called gp80 (IL-6Rα), and a 130 kDa signaling subunit, called gp130 [22, 23]. The extracellular part is responsible for IL-6 binding. The resulting IL-6–IL-6Rα complex binds to gp130, causing gp130 to homodimerise (Fig. 1a). The intracellular region of homodimerised gp130 activates signalling [24, 25]. On the cells expressing IL-6Rα, IL-6Rα binds to gp130 membrane receptors, resulting in a cell-dependent response of IL-6 through activation of gp130 [21]. Gp130 is found not only on the surfaces of cells expressing IL-6Rα, but on nearly all cells in almost every organs [16, 26]. Thus, gp130 is also found on the surface of cells that, in the absence of the IL-6Rα receptor, are normally unaffected by IL-6.

Fig. 1
figure1

The mode of action of IL-6. a IL-6 binds to membrane-bound IL-6Rα (gp80). The IL-6–IL-6Rα complex binds to gp130 membrane receptor, which is responsible for signaling. IL-6 acts on cells expressing IL-6Rα. b Metalloproteases are able to cleave the exodomain of membrane-bound IL-6Rα (gp80). Bacterial exogenous metalloproteases are directly capable of IL-6Rα shedding. In addition, bacteria are able to solubilize IL-6Rα by activating endogenous metalloproteases. The resulting soluble sIL-6R binds IL-6 with the same affinity as membrane-bound IL-6Rα. The IL-6–sIL-6R complex is also able to bind to the gp130 membrane receptor on cells that do not express IL-6Rα, thus affecting organs that would not be affected by IL-6 and the cytokine storm. This mechanism may contribute to the development of multiorgan involvement in the cytokine storm

The extracellular part of IL-6Rα can be cleaved by metalloproteases in a process called shedding [27, 28]. These metalloproteases can be endogenous metalloproteases such as ADAM10 and ADAM17 [29, 30] and exogenous bacterial metalloproteases [31] that cleave IL-6Rα to generate soluble IL-6Rα (sIL-6R). SIL-6R can bind IL-6 similarly as IL-6Rα, and promotes the IL-6 signal to gp130 (Fig. 1b) [32, 33]. Signaling via sIL-6R is called trans-signaling [34, 35].

Many pathogenic bacteria affect IL-6 signaling through several direct and indirect mechanisms. First, they can induce higher IL-6 expression [36]. Second, they produce exogenous metalloproteases that stimulate the formation of sIL-6R by the shedding. Exogenous metalloproteases from many bacteria, such as Bacillus subtilis, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Listeria monocytogenes are able to cleave IL-6Rα and other cell surface receptors [31, 37]. Bacteria-cleaved sIL-6R exhibits the same biological activity as those that are cleaved by endogenous metalloproteases or the membrane-bound IL-6Rα itself [31, 38]. The same activity includes that these sIL-6Rs are capable to induce IL-6 signaling in other, often distant cells through trans-signaling (Fig. 1b) [31, 33]. Third, bacteria can also be stimulators of endogenous receptor shedding by producing substances and toxins [38,39,40]. Bacterial toxins at very low, even at ng/ml concentrations, can induce a drastic (up to 50%) cleavage of IL-6Rα in a very short time (in 10 min) resulting in measurable physiological effect [38]. For example, the toxins streptolysin O by Group A Streptococcus (GAS) and hemolysin by Escherichia coli can induce the release of IL-6Rα from human monocytes and macrophages [38, 41]. The lipoteichoic acid toxin of S. aureus stimulates, for example, ADAM10, which not only solubilizes IL-6Rα, but also influences EGF receptor activation by playing a role in HB-EGF ectodomain shedding. Through the HB-EGF ectodomain shedding, the toxin of S. aureus activates the production of mucin in the lung, leading to airway obstruction, which is also a problem in COVID-19 infection [42]. S. aureus and P. aeruginosa induce IL-6Rα shedding by stimulating ADAM17 [36]. Because of all the reasons above, it is highly important to acknowledge that in a number of bacterial infections the exogenous or endogenous metalloprotease levels and their activity are elevated [31, 38]. Even if the bacteria do not manifest a disease, it can cause high levels of sIL-6R, and through the formation of IL-6–sIL-6R complexes, it can significantly increase the number of cells and organs responding to IL-6 signaling (Fig. 1b) [43,44,45].

Presentation of the hypothesis

Based on the known direct and indirect effect of certain bacterial species to increase the level of sIL-6R [31, 38], and the previously published role of the IL-6‒sIL-6 complex in forming cytokine storms [46], here we propose that these bacterial species could be key contributors to induce the IL-6 mediated cytokine storms.

Many bacterial species with exogenous metalloproteases that increase the level of sIL-6R are also the most common co-infections in viral pneumonia [47]: S. aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and S. marcescens. We hypothesise that the presence of any of these or similar bacteria at the time of a viral infection can lead to an increased level of sIL-6R and exacerbation of the severe disease processes, including multiorgan involvement and cytokine storms. Thus, the presence of these bacteria should be considered not only as cause of co-infections but as predisposing factors, which may worsen the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 virus infection by enhancing IL-6 mediated signaling.

Our hypothesis fits perfectly with the two-hit model of systemic inflammation caused by lung injury leading to cytokine storm. Recently, the two-hit model was applied to SARS-CoV-2 infection, where following lung injuries, as a first hit cytokine (e.g., IL-6) release is increased, then the released cytokines and other factors induce inflammation in the lungs [48]. Through the stimulation of bone marrow, cytokines induce further lung inflammation. This feedback loop, as a second hit results in a cytokine storm [48]. We point out here that the initial lung injury can be the result of or associated with the preliminary presence in the host of bacterial species capable of inducing metalloproteases.

Testing the hypothesis

The proposed hypothesis is complex to test but it is possible. One approach should aim to demonstrate the role of a bacterial predisposition, in particular the role of metalloproteases in increasing the cytokine storm effect upon SARS-CoV-2 infection through increased IL-6/sIL-6R levels. Ideally, this experiment should be in vivo to demonstrate the physiological relevance of the proposed model. Another approach should validate the relevance of these findings in infected human lung models, which recapitulate COVID-19.

To demonstrate the physiological relevance of our hypothesis, rodent models would be adequate, such as hACE2 transgenic mice or hamsters, as they generate similar immune responses to humans upon SARS-CoV-2 infection [49]. In this in vivo experiment, animals would be pre-treated with one of the bacterial species listed above (e.g., S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, S. marcescens), followed by SARS-CoV-2 infection. The experiment would contain the following conditions: (1) normal control (no treatment), (2) only bacterial pre-treatment, (3) only SARS-CoV-2 infection, (4) both bacterial pre-treatment and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, we propose to generate a bacterial strain that lacks its known and key metalloprotease (e.g., S. marcescens metalloproteinase) and use it in additional conditions to demonstrate the metalloprotease dependency of the observed changes. We suggest measuring the serum level of sIl-6r and cytokine storm markers (Il-8, Il-18, Ang-2 and von Willebrand factor) [50] in five time points over 3 weeks to capture the dynamics of the cytokine storm. In addition, while it is not essential to directly prove the hypothesis, after sacrificing the animals, key organs such as lung, kidney, brain or the intestine can be used to gain deeper understanding of local tissue damage in the various conditions. The measurements from each condition can be compared to establish: (a) the effect of bacterial pre-treatment on the dynamics of cytokine storm development (using condition 3 vs 4, and condition 2 as a control); (b) the role of a bacterial metalloprotease in the cytokine storm dynamics (comparing measures upon pre-treatment with wild-type and metalloprotease lacking bacterial strains in condition 2 and condition 4 separately. We assume to prove our hypothesis, comparison of condition 3 versus 4 will result in decreased time and potentially increased level for cytokine storm markers, and these levels would correlate with the serum level of sIl-6r.

To validate the relevance of the hypothesis for human COVID-19 and to confirm the specific role of the metalloproteases in this process, we propose to use human lung organ chip systems, such as the one created recently by Zhang et al. [51]. Here using similar conditions as proposed above, the production of Ang-2 and von Willebrand factor from the endothelial cells can be measured and compared between the same conditions. Furthermore, this experimental model will enable us to add only specific metalloproteases or bacterial toxins to the system, like SMP (Serratia marescens metalloproteinase), hemolysin (E. coli) or Streptolysin O (Group A Streptococcus) and not living bacteria. With this approach we can eliminate the co-infection related complex effect proposed in the previous experiment, and address the role of these specific metalloproteases (one in each experiment with three conditions based on previous publications [38]. Finally, to validate the proposed mechanism itself, this experimental system also allows to model the effect of increased IL-6 even without SARS-CoV-2 infection. By adding IL-6 to the microfluidic system with and without the presence of bacterial pre-treatment, one can measure sIL-6R levels and key IL-6 target gene expression changes with qPCR.

Implications of the hypothesis

Validation of our hypothesis will support efforts to reduce the risk of developing life-threatening conditions, for example by initiating appropriate antibiotic therapy prophylactically in the early stages of infection. For those at risk and/or those with underlying health conditions it would be worthwhile to reconsider the treatment recommendations to minimize sIL-6R shedding much earlier, in the initial stage of the disease. We recommend considering the administration of antibiotics to reduce the likelihood of developing a cytokine storm.

Several studies suggest that treatment of COVID-19 patients with antibiotics may be important for the prevention and treatment of bacterial co-infections [52,53,54]. However, treatment protocols/recommendations recommend antibiotic treatment in case of bacterial co-infections [47, 55, 56], often in patients with developing severe conditions or in the case of multiorgan failure.

Medical recommendations are usually very cautious about the use of antibiotics due to the risk of developing antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. In addition, caution is advised as some antibiotics act by stimulating the immune response (increasing the amount of IL-6, IL-1, TNF-α), which can potentially induce a cytokine storm, thus helping to develop a life-threatening condition [57].

Based on the physiological processes mentioned above, it is probable that an earlier introduced antibiotic treatment to a wider population may contribute to a better prognosis. This may be particularly important in virus infected closed communities (e.g., nursing homes, non-COVID-19 hospital wards).

In case of clinical approval of the efficacy of our suggestion, it would be important to test similar antibiotic treatment for other viral diseases threatening to develop a cytokine storm (such as H1N1, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV), and after confirmation include the antibiotics in the respective treatment protocol.

Limitations and further considerations

Further analysis on the effectiveness of the empirical antibiotic treatment is recommended in clinical studies. Considering the huge variety of chronic diseases and the various use of antibiotic regiments, it is going to be difficult to randomise the required data in an extensive clinical study. Therefore, we suggest data examination through the means of meta-analysis and/or systematic review. Planning of such study would require sufficient general data of the patients, their chronic diseases and the antibiotics used prior to and during their treatment. There are multiple integrated global resources already available for researcher, like the commercial IBM MarketScan® [58], Clinical Practice Research Datalink [59] and Premier® Healthcare Database (PHD) [60]. They contain data of patients currently under antibiotics for a different reason and their hospitalization rates, CRP levels, ventilation and need of ICU. In the near future, analysing these databases could indicate the possible role of bacterial infection in the severity of COVID-19. While these meta-analysis studies would provide indirect evidence, they could be complemented with those direct validatory experiments we propose above. Data extraction and randomisation from retrospective and case studies would not require any additional clinical testing.

The higher level of sIL-6R proved to be correlated with diseases e.g., asthma [61] and dermatitis [62]. It is possible to measure the sIL-6R level from serum or sputum [63] of patients at a very early stage of infection or those at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. These data may provide information to define possible predictive sIL-6R risk levels. Defining key sIL-6R levels that can predict the potential outcome of the infection would help to plan the most effective, personal treatment for each patient. However, it is important to note that the sIL-6R level can be influenced by many circumstances (advanced stage of COVID-19 infection, other diseases, genetic differences, alternative splicing etc.). Therefore, the measurement of sIL-6R level can be a useful and effective predictive tool but not specific to measure the influence of bacterial induced metalloproteases.

In several countries a higher rate of mortality associated to COVID-19 is observed in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities [64, 65]. There is no explanation for the difference yet. Among the possible reasons, a relevant difference in the bacterial flora cannot be ruled out. However, the polymorphism of the IL-6 and IL-6R genes in different ethnic groups is more likely to be behind the observed difference [66, 67]. These polymorphisms can be associated with differences in the incidence of certain diseases (e.g., atrial fibrillation, cancer) between ethnic groups [67,68,69]. Our hypothesis study does not cover the study of such differences, only the description of the hypothesised mechanism and the prevention or alleviation of diseases associated with cytokine storms, respectively. However, the problem of different mortality of ethnic groups is important from a clinical point of view, so it would be worthwhile to examine this in more detailed, subsequent studies.

As it was shown for COVID-19 infection that levels of IL-6, along with IL-8 and TNF-α, were powerful predictors of severity and survival at the time of hospitalization [70], using IL-6 inhibitors could be a promising therapy against sever COVID-19. At present however it is too early to declare whether IL-6 inhibitors, such as Tocilizumab (TCZ) will prove to be efficient. In a number of single centre studies TCZ seems to be effective [71,72,73] but other studies do not seem to report positive results [74, 75]. The systematic reviews and meta-analysis data still have a high grade of bias due to the high variation of therapeutic schemes [76]. If any gp130 antagonist or any IL-6 inhibitor/antibody treatment would prove to be efficient in the future, it would support our theory.

Patients may face serious conditions and complications that are typically associated with COVID-19 infection at a later stage (e.g., COVID-19 Associated Lung Injury, Diffuse Alveolar Damage, edema, respiratory failure etc.) [48]. These diseases can lead to serious, life-threatening conditions and can induce a cytokine storm as a consequence of lung damages and inflammation. In this paper, we wanted to draw attention to the risk factors in the very early stages of COVID-19 infection and potential options for their elimination. While there are multiple reasons that can lead to the development of a cytokine storm especially in the later stages of COVID-19 infection, bacterial induced elevation of sIL-6Rs as a result of early and preceding bacterial infections could be one of the causes that can be well controlled. Removing these bacterial infections will not eliminate all the causes, especially those caused by subsequent severe conditions, but it can have an important preventive effect in a hopefully significant part of the cases or groups at risk.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ADAM10:

A Disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 10

ADAM17:

A Disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17

Ang-2:

Angiopoietin-2

BAME:

Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease

EGF:

Epidermal growth factor

GAS:

Group A Streptococcus

gp80:

(=IL-6Rα) IL-6 binding subunit of interleukin-6 receptor

gp130:

Signaling subunit of interleukin-6 receptor

H1N1:

Hemagglutinin Type 1 and Neuraminidase Type 1 influenza strain

H5N1:

Hemagglutinin Type 5 and Neuraminidase Type 1 influenza strain

hACE2:

Human Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

HB-EGH:

Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor

IL-1:

Interleukin-1

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

IL-6R:

Interleukin-6 receptor

IL-6Rα:

IL-6 binding subunit of interleukin-6 receptor

Il-8:

Interleukin-8 (mouse)

Il-18:

Interleukin-18 (mouse)

MERS-CoV:

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

qPCR:

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

sIL-6R:

Soluble interleukin-6 receptor

SMP:

Serratia marescens Metalloproteinase

TCZ:

Tocilizumab

Th2:

T helper cell 2

TNF-α:

Tumour Necrosis Factor α

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update. Wkly. Epidemiol. Updat.—10 Novemb. 2020. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 16]. p. 1;4. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20201012-weekly-epi-update-9.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2020.

  2. 2.

    Cao X. COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:269–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0308-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tetro JA. Is COVID-19 receiving ADE from other coronaviruses? Microbes Infect. 2020;22:72–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.02.006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pedersen SF, Ho YC. SARS-CoV-2: a storm is raging. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:2202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen C, Zhang XR, Ju ZY, He WF. Advances in the research of mechanism and related immunotherapy on the cytokine storm induced by coronavirus disease 2019. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020;36:471–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Behrens EM, Koretzky GA. Review: cytokine storm syndrome: looking toward the precision medicine era. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:1135–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Oldstone MBA, Rosen H. Cytokine storm plays a direct role in the morbidity and mortality from influenza virus infection and is chemically treatable with a single sphingosine-1-phosphate agonist molecule. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;378:129–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Woo PCY, Tung ETK, Chan KH, Lau CCY, Lau SKP, Yuen KY. Cytokine profiles induced by the novel swine-origin influenza A/H1N1 virus: implications for treatment strategies. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:346–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lee N, Wong CK, Chan PKS, Chan MCW, Wong RYK, Lun SWM, et al. Cytokine response patterns in severe pandemic 2009 h1n1 and seasonal influenza among hospitalized adults. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26050.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cheng XW, Lu J, Wu CL, Yi LN, Xie X, Shi XD, et al. Three fatal cases of pandemic 2009 influenza A virus infection in Shenzhen are associated with cytokine storm. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011;175:185–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cheung CY, Poon LLM, Lau AS, Luk W, Lau YL, Shortridge KF, et al. Induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human macrophages by influenza A (H5N1) viruses: a mechanism for the unusual severity of human disease? Lancet. 2002;360:1831–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Channappanavar R, Perlman S. Pathogenic human coronavirus infections: causes and consequences of cytokine storm and immunopathology. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39:529–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Huang K-J, Su I-J, Theron M, Wu Y-C, Lai S-K, Liu C-C, et al. An interferon-γ-related cytokine storm in SARS patients. J Med Virol. 2005;75:185–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Olbei ML, Hautefort I, Modos D, Treveil A, Poletti M, Gul L, et al. SARS-CoV-2 causes a different cytokine response compared to other cytokine storm-causing respiratory viruses in severely ill patients. medRxiv 2020;2:2020.11.14.20231878 http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/16/2020.11.14.20231878.abstract.

  16. 16.

    Hunter CA, Jones SA. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:448–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3153.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Elias JA, Lentz V. IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor synergistically stimulate fibroblast IL-6 production and stabilize IL-6 messenger RNA. J Immunol. 1990;145:161–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kurokouchi K, Kambe F, Yasukawa K, Izumi R, Ishiguro N, Iwata H, et al. TNF-α increases expression of IL-6 and ICAM-1 genes through activation of NF-kB in Osteoblast-like ROS17/2.8 cells. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:1290–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tseng WP, Su CM, Tang CH. FAK activation is required for TNF-α-induced IL-6 production in myoblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2010;223:389–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ishimi Y, Miyaura C, Jin CH, Akatsu T, Abe E, Nakamura Y, et al. IL-6 is produced by osteoblasts and induces bone resorption. J Immunol. 1990;145:3297–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang C, Wu Z, Li JW, Zhao H, Wang GQ. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19: interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab may be the key to reduce mortality. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55:105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105954.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Taga T, Hibi M, Hirata Y, Yamasaki K, Yasukawa K, Matsuda T, et al. Interleukin-6 triggers the association of its receptor with a possible signal transducer, gp130. Cell. 1989;58:573–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zohlnhöfer D, Graeve L, Rose-John S, Schooltink H, Dittrich E, Heinrich PC. The hepatic interleukin-6 receptor Down-regulation of the interleukin-6 binding subunit (gp80) by its ligand. FEBS Lett. 1992;306:219–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hibi M, Nakajima K, Hirano T. IL-6 cytokine family and signal transduction: a model of the cytokine system. J Mol Med. 1996;74:1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Heinrich PC, Behrmann I, Müller-Newen G, Schaper F, Graeve L. Interleukin-6-type cytokine signalling through the gp130/Jak/STAT pathway. Biochem J. 1998;334:297–314.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Johnson DE, O’Keefe RA, Grandis JR. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:234–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Novick D, Engelmann H, Wallach D, Rubinstein M. Soluble cytokine receptors are present in normal human urine. J Exp Med. 1989;170:1409–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jones SA, Horiuchi S, Topley N, Yamamoto N, Fuller GM. The soluble interleukin 6 receptor: mechanisms of production and implications in disease. FASEB J. 2001;15:43–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Garbers C, Jänner N, Chalaris A, Moss ML, Floss DM, Meyer D, et al. Species specificity of ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteins in interleukin-6 (IL-6) trans-signaling and novel role of ADAM10 in inducible IL-6 receptor shedding. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:14804–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Düsterhöft S, Lokau J, Garbers C. The metalloprotease ADAM17 in inflammation and cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215:152410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2019.04.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Vollmer P, Walev I, Rose-John S, Bhakdi S. Novel pathogenic mechanism of microbial metalloproteinases: liberation of membrane-anchored molecules in biologically active form exemplified by studies with the human interleukin-6 receptor. Infect Immun. 1996;64:3646–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mackiewicz A, Schooltink H, Heinrich PC, Rose-John S. Complex of soluble human IL-6-receptor / IL-6 up-regulates expression of acute-phase proteins. J Immunol. 1992;149:2021–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Baran P, Hansen S, Waetzig GH, Akbarzadeh M, Lamertz L, Huber HJ, et al. The balance of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-6soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), and IL-6sIL-6Rsgp130 complexes allows simultaneous classic and trans-signaling. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:6762–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Campbell IL, Erta M, Lim SL, Frausto R, May U, Rose-John S, et al. Trans-signaling is a dominant mechanism for the pathogenic actions of interleukin-6 in the brain. J Neurosci. 2014;34:2503–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Briso EM, Dienz O, Rincon M. Cutting edge: soluble IL-6R is produced by IL-6R ectodomain shedding in activated CD4 T cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:7102–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gómez MI, Sokol SH, Muir AB, Soong G, Bastien J, Prince AS. Bacterial induction of TNF-α converting enzyme expression and IL-6 receptor α shedding regulates airway inflammatory signaling. J Immunol. 2005;175:1930–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen Y, Hayashida A, Bennett AE, Hollingshead SK, Pyong WP. Streptococcus pneumoniae sheds syndecan-1 ectodomains through ZmpC, a metalloproteinase virulence factor. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:159–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Walev I, Vollmer P, Palmer M, Bhakdi S, Rose-John S. Pore-forming toxins trigger shedding of receptors for interleukin 6 and lipopolysaccharide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:7882–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Park PW, Foster TJ, Nishi E, Duncan SJ, Klagsbrun M, Chen Y. Activation of Syndecan-1 ectodomain shedding by Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin and β-toxin. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:251–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Park PW, Pier GB, Preston MJ, Goldberger O, Fitzgerald ML, Bernfield M. Syndecan-1 shedding is enhanced by LasA, a secreted virulence factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:3057–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wilson M, Seymour R, Henderson B. Bacterial perturbation of cytokine networks. Infect Immun. 1998;66:2401–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lemjabbar H, Basbaum C. Platelet-activating factor receptor and ADAM10 mediate responses to Staphylococcus aureus in epithelial cells. Nat Med. 2002;8:41–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Marz P, Herget T, Lang E, Otter U, Rose-john S. Activation of gp 130 by IL-6/soluble IL-6 receptor induces neuronal differentiation. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10:2765–73.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Modur V, Li Y, Zimmerman GA, Prescott SM, McIntyre TM. Retrograde inflammatory signaling from neutrophils to endothelial cells by soluble interleukin-6 receptor alpha. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:2752–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Uciechowski P, Dempke WCM. Interleukin-6: a masterplayer in the cytokine network. Oncology. 2020;98:131–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Mahmud-Al-Rafat A, Majumder A, Taufiqur Rahman KM, Mahedi Hasan AM, Didarul Islam KM, Taylor-Robinson AW, et al. Decoding the enigma of antiviral crisis: does one target molecule regulate all? Cytokine. 2019;115:13–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, Loeb M, Gong MN, Fan E, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Polidoro RB, Hagan RS, de Santis SR, Schmidt NW. Overview: systemic inflammatory response derived from lung injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection explains severe outcomes in COVID-19. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1626.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Muñoz-Fontela C, Dowling WE, Funnell SGP, Gsell PS, Riveros-Balta AX, Albrecht RA, et al. Animal models for COVID-19. Nature. 2020;586:509–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hay KA, Hanafi LA, Li D, Gust J, Liles WC, Wurfel MM, et al. Kinetics and biomarkers of severe cytokine release syndrome after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor–modified T-cell therapy. Blood. 2017;130:2295–306.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zhang M, Wang P, Luo R, Wang Y, Li Z, Guo Y, et al. A human disease model of SARS-CoV-2-induced lung injury and immune responses with a microengineered organ chip. bioRxiv Prepr. 2020.

  52. 52.

    Ali I, Alharbi OML. COVID-19: disease, management, treatment, and social impact. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728:138861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138861.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Jin YH, Cai L, Cheng ZS, Cheng H, Deng T, Fan YP, et al. A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version). Med J Chin People’s Lib Army. 2020;45:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Harapan H, Itoh N, Yufika A, Winardi W, Keam S, Te H, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a literature review. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13:667–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.03.019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Uyeki TM, Bernstein HH, Bradley JS, Englund JA, File TM, Fry AM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america: 2018 update on diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management of seasonal influenza. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68:895–902.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sanidad. M de. Gobierno de España. Documento técnico Manejo clínico de pacientes con enfermedad por el nuevo coronavirus. 2020. https://www.sedar.es/images/site/NOTICIAS/coronavirus/Protocolo-manejo-clinico-COVID-19.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2020.

  57. 57.

    Hantoushzadeh S, Norooznezhad AH. Possible cause of inflammatory storm and septic shock in patients diagnosed with (COVID-19). Arch Med Res. 2020;51:347–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.03.015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    IBM Watson Health. IBM MarketScan Research Databases for life sciences researchers. 2019;1–16. https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/OWZWJ0QO. Accessed 19 Dec 2020.

  59. 59.

    Clinical Practice Research Datalink. https://cprd.com/home. Accessed 19 Dec 2020.

  60. 60.

    Premier Inc. Premier® Healthcare Database (PHD). https://products.premierinc.com/applied-sciences/solutions/applied-research-and-analytics. Accessed 19 Dec 2020.

  61. 61.

    Ferreira MAR, Matheson MC, Duffy DL, Marks GB, Hui J, Le Souëf P, et al. Identification of IL6R and chromosome 11q13.5 as risk loci for asthma. Lancet. 2011;378:1006–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    McGowan LM, Smith GD, Gaunt TR, Richardson TG. Integrating Mendelian randomization and multiple-trait colocalization to uncover cell-specific inflammatory drivers of autoimmune and atopic disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(19):3293–300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ullah MA, Revez JA, Loh Z, Simpson J, Zhang V, Bain L, et al. Allergen-induced IL-6 trans-signaling activates γδ T cells to promote type 2 and type 17 airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136:1065–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.02.032.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Carethers JM. Insights into disparities observed with COVID-19. J Intern Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Holmes L, Enwere M, Williams J, Ogundele B, Chavan P, Piccoli T, et al. Black–white risk differentials in covid-19 (Sars-cov2) transmission, mortality and case fatality in the united states: translational epidemiologic perspective and challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Van Dyke AL, Cote ML, Wenzlaff AS, Land S, Schwartz AG. Cytokine SNPs: comparison of allele frequencies by race and implications for future studies. Cytokine. 2009;46:236–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2009.02.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Schnabel RB, Kerr KF, Lubitz SA, Alkylbekova EL, Marcus GM, Sinner MF, et al. Large-scale candidate gene analysis in whites and African Americans identifies IL6R polymorphism in relation to atrial fibrillation the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Candidate Gene Association Resource (CARe) project. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011;4:557–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Berger FG. The interleukin-6 gene: a susceptibility factor that may contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88:281–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Zabaleta J, Schneider BG, Ryckman K, Hooper PF, Camargo MC, Piazuelo MB, et al. Ethnic differences in cytokine gene polymorphisms: potential implications for cancer development. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008;57:107–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang HH, Beckmann ND, Nirenberg S, Wang B, et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat Med. 2020;26:1636–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1051-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Biran N, Ip A, Ahn J, Go RC, Wang S, Mathura S, et al. Tocilizumab among patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: a multicentre observational study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2:e603–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30277-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Klopfenstein T, Zayet S, Lohse A, Balblanc JC, Badie J, Royer PY, et al. Tocilizumab therapy reduced intensive care unit admissions and/or mortality in COVID-19 patients. Med Mal Infect. 2020;50:397–400.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Xu X, Han M, Li T, Sun W, Wang D, Fu B, et al. Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:10970–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Campochiaro C, Della-Torre E, Cavalli G, De Luca G, Ripa M, Boffini N, et al. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 patients: a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Eur J Intern Med. 2020;76:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2020.05.021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Morena V, Milazzo L, Oreni L, Bestetti G, Fossali T, Bassoli C, et al. Off-label use of tocilizumab for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Milan. Italy Eur J Intern Med. 2020;76:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2020.05.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Lan SH, Lai CC, Huang HT, Chang SP, Lu LC, Hsueh PR. Tocilizumab for severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56:106103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their specific suggestions and opinion that helped to shape the presentation of the hypothesis.

Funding

This work was supported by a fellowship to TK in computational biology at the Earlham Institute (Norwich, UK) in partnership with the Quadram Institute (Norwich, UK), and strategically supported by the Biotechnological and Biosciences Research Council, UK Grants (BB/J004529/1, BB/P016774/1). TK was also supported by a BBSRC Core Strategic Programme Grant (BB/CSP17270/1) and a BBSRC ISP grant for Gut Microbes and Health BB/R012490/1 and its constituent Projects: BBS/E/F/000PR10353 and BBS/E/F/000PR10355.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KL, FNL provided the basic idea and prepared the first draft. TS provided the medical background. All authors participated in the design of the hypothesis, carried out literature searches and in the writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katalin Lenti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Földvári-Nagy, L., Schnabel, T., Dörnyei, G. et al. On the role of bacterial metalloproteases in COVID-19 associated cytokine storm. Cell Commun Signal 19, 7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-020-00699-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • IL-6
  • Cytokine storm
  • Metalloprotease
  • Bacteria
  • COVID-19