Fig. 4From: Simulation of gap junction formation reveals critical role of Cys disulfide redox state in connexin hemichannel dockingFree cysteine residues 54C, 61C and 192C in the S–S open model disorient residues involved in trans-GJ interactions. A Number of trans-GJ H-bonds (left) and specific residue pairs forming these trans-GJ H-bonds (right) during the 100 ns MD in the HC-HC model with closed disulfides. Colour bar shows the number of subunit pairs on which the specific trans-GJ H-bonds is present. B Number of trans-GJ H-bonds (left) and specific residue pairs forming these trans-GJ H-bonds (right) during the 100 ns MD in the HC-HC model with HCs positioned 3 Å away. Colour bar shows the number of subunit pairs on which the specific trans-GJ H-bonds is present. C Number of trans-GJ H-bonds (left) and specific residue pairs forming these trans-GJ H-bonds (right) during the 100 ns MD in the HC-HC model with open disulfides. Colour bar shows the number of subunit pairs on which the specific trans-GJ H-bonds is present. D Number of H-bonds involving Cys residues (left) and specific residue pairs forming these H-bonds (right) during the 100 ns MD in the HC-HC model with open Cys disulfides. Colour bar shows the number of subunit pairs on which the specific Cys-interface H-bond is present. E 3D representation of the HC-HC interface shows disorientation of 58Q from the position required to make trans-GJ H-bonding. Trans-GJ H-bonds between opposing 58Q residues are formed in the HC-HC model with closed disulfides (top). In the open disulfide model (bottom) 58Q oxygen atoms are involved in H-bonds with Cys thiol residues instead of forming trans-GJ interactionsBack to article page