Skip to main content
Fig. 9 | Cell Communication and Signaling

Fig. 9

From: The activation of PPARγ enhances Treg responses through up-regulating CD36/CPT1-mediated fatty acid oxidation and subsequent N-glycan branching of TβRII/IL-2Rα

Fig. 9

The regulation of PPARγ agonists on CD36/CPT1-mediated FAO and Treg responses exerts a PPARγ-dependent feature. a The naïve CD4+ T cells were prepared and treated with anti-CD3/CD28 in the presence or absence of TGF-β (5 ng/mL), rosiglitazone (10, 30 μM), 15d-PGJ2 (3, 10 μM) as well as morin (10, 30 μM) for 48 h. The binding of PPARγ to the promoter of CD36/CPT1 was detected by ChIP assay. b, c The naïve CD4+ T cells were prepared and treated with anti-CD3/CD28 in the presence or absence of TGF-β (5 ng/mL), actinomycin D (Act-D; 1 μM), rosiglitazone (30 μM), 15d-PGJ2 (10 μM) as well as morin (30 μM) for 48 h. The mRNA expression levels of CD36 and CPT1 were measured by Q-PCR (b), and the protein levels of CD36 and CPT1 were detected by western blotting (c). dj The naïve CD4+ T cells were prepared and treated with anti-CD3/CD28 in the presence or absence of TGF-β (5 ng/mL), GW9662 (1 μM), rosiglitazone (30 μM), 15d-PGJ2 (10 μM) as well as morin (30 μM). After 48 h, the mRNA expression levels of CD36 (d) and CPT1 (e) were measured by Q-PCR. After 72 h, the frequency of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells was examined by flow cytometry (f), and the mRNA expression levels of Foxp3 (g), IL-10 (h), CTLA4 (i) and TIGIT (j) were measured by Q-PCR. kn The naïve CD4+ T cells were transfected with PPARγ KO plasmid and treated with anti-CD3/CD28 in the presence or absence of TGF-β (5 ng/mL), rosiglitazone (30 μM), 15d-PGJ2 (10 μM) as well as morin (30 μM). After 48 h, the mRNA expression levels of CD36 (k) and CPT1 (l) were measured by Q-PCR. After 72 h, the frequency of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells was examined by flow cytometry (m), and the mRNA expression level of Foxp3 (n) was measured by Q-PCR. Data were presented as the means ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments (n = 3). #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus control group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus TGF-β group (model group); $P < 0.05, $$P < 0.01 versus rosiglitazone group; &P < 0.05, &&P < 0.01 versus 15d-PGJ2 group; P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01 versus morin group

Back to article page