Estrogen-ERα signaling and DNA hypomethylation co-regulate expression of stem cell protein PIWIL1 in ERα-positive endometrial cancer cells

Background We previously identified PIWIL1 as an oncogene involved in endometrial carcinogenesis. However, the mechanism of Piwil1 mediated regulation of tumorigenesis remains poorly understood. Methods The expression levels of target genes in endometrial cancer cells were detected by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) and western blotting. Up- or down-regulation of ERα or PIWIL1 was achieved by transient transfection with expressing plasmids or short hairpin RNA (shRNA). Dual-luciferase reporter assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) were used to demonstrate the ERα bound to the half estrogen response element (half-ERE) located in PIWIL1 promoter. The expression of PIWIL1 and ERα in endometrial carcinoma tissues were investigated using immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR. The proliferation ability of cancer cells were evaluated by MTT. Methylation status of the PIWIL1 promoter was detected by bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP). Results In the present study, we found that PIWIL1 mediated E2-stimulated cancer cell proliferation. In ERα-positive endometrial cancer cells, we demonstrated that estrogen-ERα signaling significantly up-regulated the expression of PIWIL1, which was mediated by binding of the ERα onto the PIWIL1 promoter. Furthermore, we found that a half-ERE in the PIWIL1 promoter was essential for ERα binding. The PIWIL1 promoter was hypomethylated in ERα-positive endometrial cancer cells. Treatment with 5-aza-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) could up-regulate PIWIL1 expression. Conclusions These findings uncover a novel molecular mechanism by which estrogen-ERα signaling and DNA hypomethylation co-regulate PIWIL1 expression. These findings provide novel insights into the hormonal regulation of PIWIL1 in endometrial cancer and the PIWIL1’s role in estrogen-stimulated endometrial carcinogenesis. Video Abstract. (MP4 41319 kb)


Background
Endometrial carcinoma could be broadly categorized into two major types, referred to as type I and type II [1,2]. Clinically, most endometrial cancers are type I endometrial carcinomas which are estrogen-dependent endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Estrogen exerts its biological activities by binding to estrogen receptors, mainly the ERα, which regulate the expression of a variety of genes involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of endometrial carcinoma [3][4][5][6].
PIWIL1 belongs to the PIWI family. PIWI was first identified in Drosophila as an essential factor for the self-renewal of germline stem cells [7]. Evidences showed that PIWIL1 as an oncogene was overexpressed in several tumors including gastric cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, soft-tissue sarcoma, adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and endometrial cancer [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Most of the studies have focused on the role of PIWIs in gonadal development [15][16][17][18][19]. Estrogen has been suggested to play an important role in gonadal development. Several studies found that estrogen could regulate the expression of the PIWI family [20,21]. In our previous study, we found that the expression of PIWIL1 was higher in ERα-positive endometrial cancer cell lines and tissues [9]. These publications give clues about regulation of PIWIL1 by estrogen in endometrial cancer. However, the molecular basis underlying the association between estrogen and PIWIL1 is not fully understood and remains a challenging question.
DNA methylation changes are hallmarks of every cancer type and can be early events in tumorigenesis. DNA methylation alterations may result in gene expression changes, namely gene silencing due to DNA hypermethylation and gene activation due to DNA hypomethylation. The frequent occurrence of cancerlinked DNA hypermethylation and DNA hypomethylation is associated with carcinogenesis [22]. Previous study observed the existence of promoter CpG island hypermethylation-associated silencing of PIWIL1 in primary seminoma and non-seminoma testicular tumors [23]. Some studies also found that promoter DNA hypomethylation of PIWIL1 could contribute to its aberrant expression in lung adenocarcinoma [24,25]. However, the relationship between DNA methylation status of PIWIL1 promoter and PIWIL1 expression in endometrial cancer is unknown.
Herein, we demonstrate a novel molecular mechanism by which estrogen-ERα signaling and DNA hypomethylation co-regulate PIWIL1 expression in endometrial cancer. These findings provide novel insights into the hormonal regulation of PIWIL1 in endometrial cancer and the PIWIL1's role in estrogen-stimulated endometrial carcinogenesis.

Patients and samples
The study was approved by the Human Investigation Ethics Committee of the authors' affiliated institution. The samples of endometrial carcinoma and normal endometrial tissues were obtained after written informed consent at our institution from 2017 to 2018. Thirty formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues (15 ERαpositive endometrial carcinoma and 15 ERα-negative endometrial carcinoma) were used for immunohistochemistry, and 30 fresh frozen samples were used for RT-qPCR analysis. The stages and histological grades of these tumors were established according to the criteria of the Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) surgical staging system (2009) [26]. None of the patients underwent hormone therapy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy prior to surgery.
Immunohistochemistry, RNA extraction, RT-qPCR and western blotting Immunohistochemistry, RNA extraction, RT-qPCR and western blotting were performed as described previously [9,27]. Primers sequences for RT-qPCR were shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. Evaluation of PIWIL1 and ERα staining was performed according to semi quantitative immunoreactivity scores [9].

Cell preparation and culture conditions
The human endometrial carcinoma cell lines, Ishikawa, RL95-2 (ERα-positive) and HEC-1B (ERα-negative) [28] were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Committee Type Culture Collection (Shanghai, China) and maintained in DMEM/F12 (Gibco, Auckland, NZ) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA). Prior to treatment with different concentrations of E 2 or 10 − 7 mol/L ICI 182,780, cells were cultured at the same density in serum-free medium for 72 h to minimize the influence of FBS. For demethylation studies, cells were treated with 5 μM 5-aza-dC for 72 h.

Cell proliferation assay
Cells were plated in 96-well plates with 2000 cells/well and was divided into the different groups: control (EV /shNC, control vector), only in the presence of E 2 (10 −8 mol/L), exPiwil1, shPiwil1, E 2 plus exPiwil1 and E 2 plus shPiwil1. Then, 20 μL MTT was added to each well before incubation at 37°C for 4 h. Absorbance values were then measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Red).

Promoter-luciferase reporter assay
A luciferase reporter assay was performed as described previously [29,30]. PIWIL1 promoter reporter-containing plasmid (WT: wild type, MUT: mutation of the half-ERE, DEL: deletion of the half-ERE, Fig. 3a) and ERαexpressing plasmid were purchased from ELK Biotechnology CO., LTD (Shanghai). Ishikawa, RL95-2 and HEC-1B cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 1 × 10 5 per well on the day prior to transfection. The following day, PIWIL1 promoter reporter-containing plasmid (WT, MUT and DEL) together with internal control plasmid expressing Renilla-luciferase were co-transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies; USA). Reporter activity was measured at 48 h post-transfection using a Dual-Luciferase Assay System (Promega; Madison, WI, USA). Besides, cells which were stimulated with or without 17β-E 2 (10 −8 mol/L) were also co-transfected with PIWIL1 promoter reporter-containing plasmid (WT, MUT and DEL), ERα-expressing plasmid and internal control plasmid expressing Renilla-luciferase to examine the role of ERα in PIWIL1 expression.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
ChIP assays were performed using a ChIP assay kit (Millipore) as previously described in the Ishikawa cell line [27,29,31]. Samples were sonicated to shear DNA to an average fragment size of 200-1000 bp. Precipitated DNA was analyzed by qPCR with PIWIL1 promoterspecific primers Primer pair1, Primer pair2 and Primer pair3 ( Fig. 4a and Additional file 2: Table S2) [29]. Enrichment was calculated using the 2 -△△Ct formula. IgG was used as negative control.

Bisulfite sequencing PCR
According to the manufacture's instruction, genomic DNA was isolated using the DNA Extraction Mini Kit (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China) and bisulfite modification was performed with the EZ DNA Methylation Gold Kit (ZYMO Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Primer sequences for bisulfite sequencing of the PIWIL1 fragment were 5′-GGTGTTTTGGGGGGTTAGG-3′ (forward) and 5′-ACCTCCCAAAACCTCCTTC-3′ (reverse), which were used to amplify a 376 bp product. This area contains 40 CpG sites. The PCR conditions were: denaturation at 95°C for 4 min, 35 cycles at 95°C for 30s, 56°C for 30s, and 72°C for 30s. PCR products were purified directly using the TIAN gel Midi Purification Kit (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China) and ligated into the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Purified plasmid DNA containing the PIWIL1 sequence was sequenced.

Statistical analysis
All data analyses were performed using the software package SPSS v. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were presented as mean ± SD and Student's t-test was used for comparison between two groups. Correlation analysis was performed with the Spearman's test. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All experiments were performed at least three times.

PIWIL1 expression induced by E 2 in endometrial cancer cells
We first utilized different concentrations of E 2 (10 − 101 0 − 8 mol/L) to stimulate three endometrial cancer lines and analyzed the expression of PIWIL1 at different times (24 h, 48 h, 72 h). We found that the expression of PIWIL1 was up-regulated by E 2 treatment in a time-and dose-dependent manner in Ishikawa and RL95-2 cells ( Fig. 1a and b). For HEC-1B cells, we found that estrogen regulated the expression of PIWIL1 in another timeand dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1c).
To further understand the regulatory relationship between PIWIL1 and estrogen-ERα signaling, Ishikawa and RL95-2 cells were transfected with ERα shRNA (shERα) and HEC-1B cells was transfected with ERα-expressing vector (exERα). These results showed that silencing ERα decreased the expression of PIWIL1 and overexpression of ERα increased the expression of PIWIL1 (Fig. 2c). These results suggested that estrogen-ERα signaling can up-regulate the expression of PIWIL1 in ERα-positive endometrial cancer cells.

Effect of the half-ERE in the PIWIL1 promoter for ERα binding
Analysis of the PIWIL1 promoter reveals a half-ERE (5′-GGTCA-3′) [32] at~1112 bp upstream to its translation start site, which is surrounded by GC-rich regions. To test whether this half-ERE is involved in ERα binding onto the PIWIL1 promoter, we constructed a PIWIL1 promoterluciferase reporter plasmid (wild type, WT) (Fig. 3a) and evaluated the effect of estrogen-ERα signaling on the activity of the PIWIL1 promoter in Ishikawa, RL95-2 and HEC-1B cells. In Ishikawa and RL95-2 cells, E 2 treatment significantly increased PIWIL1 promoter activities as determined by luciferase assays (Fig. 3b). Without ERα expression, E 2 did not induce any promoter activities in HEC-1B cells (Fig. 3c), indicating the necessity of ERα in the estrogen-induced PIWIL1 promoter activity. Reexpression of ERα increased PIWIL1 promoter activities and a combination of ERα expression vector and E 2 treatment dramatically increased the activity (Fig. 3c). We next Fig. 1 Effects of estrogen on PIWIL1 expression in endometrial cancer cells. a,b,c Ishikawa, RL95-2 and HEC-1B cells were treated for treated for different times(24 h, 48 h, 72 h) with different concentrations of E 2 (10 − 10~1 0 − 8 mol/L). PIWIL1 mRNA and protein levels were measured by RT-qPCR and western blot. Data were represented as means ± SD for three independent experiments (RT-qPCR). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 and ns, not significant versus control group. GAPDH was used as an internal control (western blot) constructed two additional PIWIL1 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmids (Mutation of the half-ERE, MUT [30]; Deletion of the half-ERE, DEL; Fig. 3a). We transfected MUT or DEL into Ishikawa and RL95-2 cells. E 2 treatment didn't increase the activities (Fig. 3d and e). After co-transfection with the ERα-expression vector and MUT or DEL into HEC-1B cells, mutation or deletion of the ERE sequence of PIWIL1 abolished the promotion effect of estrogen-ERα signaling ( Fig. 3f and g). These results further support the PIWIL1 expression is up-regulated by estrogen-ERα signaling and suggest that the half-ERE in the PIWIL1 promoter is essential for ERα binding.  The ERα antagonist ICI 182,780 (10 − 7 mol/L) was used to examine ERα in E 2 -induced PIWIL1 induction in Ishikawa and RL95-2 cells. c Ishikawa and RL95-2 cells were transfected with ERα shRNA (shERα) and HEC-1B was transfected with ERα expressing vector (exERα). The mRNA and protein levels of PIWIL1 and ERα were then assayed using RT-qPCR and western blot. Data were represented as means ± SD for three independent experiments (RT-qPCR). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 and ns, not significant versus control group. GAPDH was used as an internal control (western blot) PIWIL1 promoter. We designed three pairs of PCR primers used to amplify the PIWIL1 promoter DNA: Primer pair 1, Primer pair 2 and Primer pair 3 [29]. The half-ERE was in the fragment amplified by Primer pair1 (Fig. 4a). Ishikawa cells grown in regular media were lysed to prepare the chromatin DNA and then subjected to ChIP with anti-ERα antibody. Our study showed that the DNA amplified by Primer pair 1 was the most abundant followed by Primer pair 2. These results suggest that estrogen up-regulates the transcription of PIWIL1 by inducing the binding of the ERα onto the PIWIL1 promoter at the half-ERE (Fig. 4b).  ERα cycles onto and off promoters of its target genes in response to E 2 and its promoter occupancy peaks at 45 and 135 min post-E 2 treatment [29]. We supposed that whether the binding of the ERα onto the PIWIL1 promoter fits this model. To test this possibility, we examined the binding of the ERα at different time points after E 2 treatment in Ishikawa and RL95-2 cells using ChIP-qPCR. ERα occupancy on the PIWIL1 promoter was hardly detectable without E 2 treatment but was increased by E 2 treatment for both 45 and 135 min (Fig. 4c).

Involvement of the PIWIL1 in E 2 -induced cell growth
To establish the role of PIWIL1 in mediating the proliferative effect of estrogen and to investigate the possible involvement of PIWIL1 in endometrial carcinogenesis, we used the MTT assay. Ishikawa cells were transfected with the PIWIL1 expression plasmid (exPiwil1), shRNA against PIWIL1 (shPiwil1) and their control vector (EV or shNC). The transfection efficiency was demonstrated in our previous study [9]. Cell growth was monitored in these cells that received no treatment or treatment with estrogen. In the cells that transfected with EV or shNC, E 2 stimulated cell growth (Fig. 4d). In the cells that transfected with exPiwil1, cell growth was observed even with no E 2 treatment. Treatment with estrogen further enhanced the cell growth (Fig. 4d). In the cells that transfected with shPiwil1, cell growth stimulation by estrogen was greatly attenuated (Fig. 4d). Collectively, these experiments strongly indicate that PIWIL1 is a key effector of the estrogen-induced cell growth in endometrial cancer.

Detection of ERα and PIWIL1 in endometrial cancer tissues
To further investigate whether PIWIL1 was regulated by estrogen-ERα signaling in endometrial cancer, we analyzed the expression of ERα and PIWIL1 in the 30 endometrial cancer samples (15 ERα-positive endometrial cancer samples and 15 ERα-negative endometrial cancer samples) used immunohistochemistry. In our study, PIWIL1 immunoreactivity was mainly observed in ERαpositive endometrial cancer tissues (Fig. 5a). The mean scores for PIWIL1 staining were 10.32 for ERα-positive endometrial cancer samples and 1.82 for ERα-negative endometrial cancer samples (Fig. 5b). Then the mRNA expression levels of ERα and PIWIL1 were measured by RT-qPCR in 30 endometrial cancer samples. The ERα had a positive correlation with PIWIL1 in endometrial cancer tissue (r = 0.8, ****p < 0.0001; Fig. 5c). Taken together, these results further suggest there is a relationship between PIWIL1 and estrogen-ERα signaling in endometrial cancer. We examined the RNA-seq data from the TCGA and found that there was also a positive correlation between PIWIL1 and ERα expression in cervical cancer, kidney cancer, prostate adenocarcinoma, testicular germ cell tumors and cutaneous melanoma (data not shown).

PIWIL1 promoter hypomethylation
To understand why PIWIL1 is activated in endometrial cancer, we examined the methylation status of PIWIL1 promoter in Ishikawa, RL95-2 and HCE-1B cells. We performed direct sequencing analysis of a 376-bp fragment including 40 CpG dinucleotides in the PIWIL1 promoter at~225 bp upstream to its transcription start site and at~511 bp downstream to the half-ERE binding site. Differential methylation was observed in 40 CpG dinucleotides of the promoter in the three endometrial cancer cells (Fig. 6a). We found that the percentage of methylated CpG dinucleotides in Ishikawa, RL95-2 and HEC-1B was 45.83, 40.00 and 86.67%, respectively (Fig. 6b), suggesting that the reactivation of PIWIL1 expression in endometrial cancer is associated with hypomethylation of the PIWIL1 promoter. Moreover, we assessed the expression of PIWIL1 mRNA and protein after treatment with 5-aza-dC in HEC-1B cells. After treatment with 5-aza-dC, we found that HEC-1B cells showed reactivation of both PIWIL1 mRNA and protein expression (Fig. 6c).

Discussion
PIWIL1 is a member of the PIWI proteins, which are involved in stem cell self-renewal, division, spermatogenesis, RNA silencing, and translational regulation [33]. Cancer cells share several characteristics with stem cells, such as rapid proliferation and virtually infinite selfrenewal. Therefore, it is not surprising that germline (See figure on previous page.) Fig. 4 E 2 -induced binding of the ERα onto the PIWIL1 promoter by estrogen. a A Schematic representation of the half-ERE in the PIWIL1 promoter and the three pairs of primers used for ChIP-qPCR was shown. TSS: transcription start sites. b the PIWIL1 promoter region was precipitated by the antibody against ERα in Ishikawa cells cultured in normal media. IgG served as the negative control. RT-qPCR was performed on ChIP samples. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ns, not significant versus control group. c Ishikawa cells treated with 10 − 8 mol/L E 2 for 0, 45, and 135 min were subjected to ChIP and the precipitated DNA was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Experimental conditions are identical to those in panel b, except that cells were cultured in hormone-free media for 72 h before E 2 treatment. All experiments were performed at three times. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 versus control group (cells without E 2 treatment). d the effects of PIWIL on E 2 -induced cell growth were determined by MTT assay. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus control group factors would also be involved in carcinogenesis [34]. Our previous study revealed PIWIL1 as an oncogene in endometrial cancer [9,35]. In the present study, for the first time, we wanted to elicit the potentially molecular mechanism involved in regulating the expression of PIWIL1 in endometrial cancer.
Several studies found that estrogen could regulate the expression of the PIWI family [20,21]. In our previous study, we found that the expression of PIWIL1 was higher in ERα-positive cell lines (Ishikawa and RL95-2). Our continued examination in this study indicates that estrogen could up-regulate the expression of PIWIL1 in ERα-positive endometrial cancer cells (Fig. 1). However, our results also found that estrogen showed the function of down-regulation of PIWIL1 expression in ERα-negative endometrial cancer cell line. This finding raises the possibility that there may be another mechanism in ERαnegative cell lines which warrants further investigation.
Estrogen exerts its biological activities by binding ERs, ERα and ERβ, which mediate cellular responses to hormone exposure. The adult uterus is found, in general, to have very low expression of ERβ compared with ERα  [36]. Moreover, it is well accepted that estrogenic effect occurs predominantly through ERα in endometrial cancer. In this study, we further confirmed that estrogen could up-regulate the expression of PIWIL1 through ERα, which was based on multiple lines of evidence, including up-regulation of PIWIL1 by overexpression of ERα expression and down-regulation of PIWIL1 by the knockdown of ERα expression or using an ERα antagonist (Fig. 2). Therefore, it is assumed that estrogen could up-regulate the expression of PIWIL1 through ERα.
Estrogen-mediated signaling pathways can be divided into genomic signaling pathways and non-genomic signaling pathways [37]. ERα regulates genes through directly binding to DNA at estrogen response elements (EREs) or through protein-protein interactions with The percentage of methylated CpG dinucleotides in Ishikawa, RL95-2 and HEC-1B cells. ***p < 0.001 and ns, not significant. c RT-qPCR and western blot showed changes in PIWIL1 mRNA and protein expression in HEC-1B cells after treatment with 5-aza-dC. Data were represented as means ± SD for three independent experiments (RT-qPCR). ****p < 0.0001 versus control group. GAPDH was used as an internal control (western blot) other direct DNA binding transcription factors, such as Sp1 and Ap1 [38][39][40]. Genome-wide analysis of ERα binding has uncovered thousands of loci bound by ERα after E 2 induction and the most common motif identified at these loci is the full palindromic ERE (5′-GGTC AnnnTGACC-3′) [32]. However, the majority of bound sites of ERα do not have full palindromic sequence and usually harbor only half EREs [41,42]. Direct promoter binding usually involves an ERE with a typical consensus sequence or a half-ERE positioned next to GC-rich regions in their promoters [29]. Stender et al. performed an unbiased search for DNA motifs enriched in the identified ER binding sites and found five most enriched DNA motifs in the WT ER binding sites including the half-ERE (GGTCA) [43]. The PIWIL1 promoter does not have classical palindromic ERE. Instead, it contains a Fig. 7 Proposed model of the cooperation between E 2 -ERα signaling and DNA hypomethylation for the regulation of stem cell protein PIWIL1. upper: In normal cells, hypermethylation of PIWIL1 promoter prevents the binding of E 2 -ERα complex to PIWIL1 promoter. Lower: In endometrial cancer cells, increased PIWIL1 expression regulated by E 2 -ERα signaling is due to the cancer-linked hypomethylation of the PIWIL1 promoter half-ERE (GGTCA) which is surrounded by GC-rich regions in the PIWIL1 promoter, located~1112 bp upstream to the translation start site. In our study, we found that this half-ERE was essential for the binding of the ERα onto the PIWIL1 promoter, as revealed by Luciferase assay and ChIP-qPCR (Figs. 3 and 4a-c). However, we can't entirely exclude the possibility that activation of the PIWIL1 by estrogen requires binding of some yet unidentified ERα-associated proteins to ERα at the PIWIL1 promoter. Therefore, further studies are required to identify the detailed mechanism involved in regulation of ERα on PIWIL1.
Endometrioid carcinoma (Type I carcinomas) is the most common type of endometrial carcinoma. This process is commonly associated with unopposed estrogen stimulation [1]. Our observation indicated that PIWIL1 had a role in E 2 -stimulated cancer cells proliferation (Fig. 4d). In our study, IHC analysis showed that the level of PIWIL1 expression was significantly correlated with that of ERα expression. Furthermore, RT-qPCR analysis and bioinformatics analysis were performed to confirm our result (Fig. 5). This correlation further suggests that PIWIL1 may be a downstream target of ERα and may be involved in E 2 -stimulated endometrial carcinogenesis.
Aberrant DNA methylation have been shown to be an early event in carcinogenesis in many cancers, including endometrial cancer [44,45]. Promoters with a high density of CpGs are defined as CG-rich areas and are predominantly subject to DNA methylation. The PIWIL1 has 5′ end CpG islands surrounding the corresponding transcription start sites. Gain of 5′ end promoter CpG island methylation for the PIWIL1 is in association with their transcriptional silencing [23]. Promoter DNA hypomethylation of PIWIL1 could also contribute to its aberrant expression [24,25]. In our previous study, we found that PIWIL1 was silenced in normal endometrium and reactivated in endometrial cancer [9]. In this study, we further confirm that the expression of PIWIL1 in different endometrial cancer cell lines is associated with methylation status of the PIWIL1 promoter (Fig. 6), indicating that the reactivation of PIWIL1 in endometrial cancer may be associated with cancer-linked hypomethylation of the PIWIL1 promoter. Previous studies suggest that ERα-targeted gene expression is epigenetically regulated by ERα cooperating with co-activators in a classical and epigenetic manner [46]. Therefore, further studies are required to identify the detailed epigenetic mechanism involved in regulation of ERα on PIWIL1.

Conclusions
In summary, the study presented here demonstrates a novel molecular mechanism by which estrogen-ERα signaling and DNA hypomethylation co-regulate PIWIL1 expression in endometrial cancer (Fig. 7). These findings provide novel insights into the hormonal regulation in endometrial cancer and may offer novel therapeutic and preventative strategies for endometrial cancer and other hormonally-driven cancers in the future.
Additional file 1: Table S1. List of primers used for RT-qPCR.